Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7270.T Subaru CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Subaru Corporation7270.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Motor Vehicles

Maker of cars known for all-wheel-drive systems, popular in the US and Japan.

≈ Itself, a niche AWD-focused automaker with a devoted US followingMomentum leader 80
Mkt cap
$12.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
71%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$55.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.3 pp
WACC 7.5%
Hurdle
-8 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥2,718
1D-5.7%
1W+3.8%
1M+7.3%
3M+3.8%
6M+15.7%
YTD-18.1%
1Y-15.9%
ATR %2.7%
52w lowhigh23.6% off high

What Subaru does

Maker of cars known for all-wheel-drive systems, popular in the US and Japan.

Sells most cars in the US, where its all-wheel-drive models earn loyal repeat buyers, so the US market and the dollar-yen rate weigh heavily on results. Toyota is its largest shareholder and a technology partner. The company grew out of Fuji Heavy Industries, and its aerospace unit builds parts for Boeing aircraft.

In one line: Itself, a niche AWD-focused automaker with a devoted US following.

Products and services

  • Passenger cars/SUVs (Subaru brand)
  • Aerospace (small defense/aircraft parts business)

Customers

  • Consumers, especially in the US (its largest marke

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Automotive
  • Vehicle manufacturing
  • AWD passenger cars/SUVs

What could go right

  • Strong US brand demand/pricing power

What could go wrong

  • Heavy US-market/dollar dependence
  • Small scale versus major automakers slows EV transition

Moat: narrow (brand, IP / patents). Strong brand loyalty and engineering reputation around symmetrical all-wheel-drive technology.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1953 · Employees: 37,542

Named competitors

Subaru at a glance

Size Subaru (7270.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Motor Vehicles) with a market value of $12.3B, the 114th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,718 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 15.7%, against -15.4% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.0%); the operating margin is 2.8% (peer median 5.9%).

Valuation It trades at 12.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.7× (9th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -8 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.3 points below its cost of capital (7.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20267270.T 115Peer median 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Subaru against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Subaru financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥4.82T¥4.78T¥4.69T¥4.70T¥3.77T
Revenue growth—+2%0%+25%—
Gross profit¥684B¥679B¥941B¥957B¥703B
EBITDA¥421B¥448B¥650B¥700B¥520B
Net income¥85.2B¥90.8B¥338B¥385B¥200B
Free cash flow¥42.3B¥124B¥321B¥580B¥369B
Capital expenditure¥296B¥310B¥265B¥300B¥195B
Total debt¥364B¥550B¥530B¥523B¥427B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Subaru competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%0%+10%2015HEROMOTOCO7309TMPV992760163360006672729868000625RNO7202TMCVPAH3STLAP9973600104HYUNDAIOSK8TRA7270.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Subaru is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×25×50×75×HEROMOTOCO7309TMPV99276016336000667272000625RNOPAH3STLAP9973600104HYUNDAI8TRA7270.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Subaru is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%HEROMOTOCO73096016336000667272RNOPAH3600104HYUNDAIOSK7270.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Subaru is the large dot.

Subaru competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (7270.T vs 7203.T vs 7261.T vs 7267.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Subaru 7270.T$12.3B+16%0%3%12.0×2.7%
Toyota Motor 7203.T$251B+10%+7%7%10.6×n/a
Mazda Motor 7261.T$4.52B+12%+4%3%6.9×-14.8%
Honda Motor 7267.T$45.2B+45%+4%-1%11.7×18.2%
Volkswagen VOW.DE$39.1B-24%-3%7%5.5×n/a

How Subaru compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Subaru against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7270.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+7.3%+3.0%7th highest of 21
6-month return+15.7%-15.4%4th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-23.6%-27.8%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.3%+5.0%7th lowest of 20
Operating margin2.8%5.9%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E12.0×11.7×9th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)2.7%4.7%4th least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.1%+9.0%5th highest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-8.3 pp-3.3 pp4th least demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.3 pp-1.2 pp7th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA3.3×8.4×cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-1.4×1.7×2nd least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Subaru 7270.TJapan$12.3B+16%0%3%12.0×2.7%+11.1%
Li Auto-w 2015.HKHong Kong$12.4B-32%-24%-7%n/an/an/a
Hero Motocorp HEROMOTOCO.NSIndia$11.7B+3%+27%12%19.1×14.1%+9.2%
Shimano 7309.TJapan$11.5B+29%+5%12%35.8×6.0%+4.3%
Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles TMPV.NSIndia$11.4B-19%-22%0%10.7×n/an/a
Seres 9927.HKHong Kong$11.4B-54%-2%-4%90.9×n/an/a
Great Wall Motor 601633.SSChina$15.0B-29%+8%2%15.1×-7.1%+16.4%
Yutong Bus 600066.SSChina$10.1B-12%+3%14%11.5×-10.0%+13.8%
Yamaha Motor 7272.TJapan$10.1B+54%+10%6%9.3×4.2%+11.5%
XPeng 9868.HKHong Kong$9.51B-37%+29%-7%n/an/an/a
Chongqing Changan Automobile 000625.SZChina$9.51B-25%-7%0%28.5×n/an/a
Renault RNO.PAFrance$9.39B+2%+6%6%4.9×3.4%+5.9%
Isuzu Motors 7202.TJapan$9.26B-1%+5%6%8.8×n/an/a
Tata Motors TMCV.NSIndia$16.6B-2%n/a9%20.7×17.8%n/a
Porsche Automobil Holding SE Pref PAH3.DEGermany$8.98B-19%+13%108%33.4×9.4%+2.4%
Stellantis STLAP.PAFrance$17.0B-40%-2%-14%8.2×n/an/a
Chery Automobile 9973.HKHong Kong$17.8B-22%+11%5%5.8×n/an/a
SAIC Motor 600104.SSChina$17.8B-24%-3%2%11.9×-14.7%-2.4%
Hyundai Motor India HYUNDAI.NSIndia$18.3B+16%+8%7%33.0×26.6%+11.8%
Oshkosh OSKUnited States$8.19B-3%+4%7%11.2×4.7%+8.7%
Traton 8TRA.DEGermany$18.9B+2%+1%6%6.1×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Subaru's main competitors?
Named competitors: Toyota Motor (7203.T), Mazda Motor (7261.T), Honda Motor (7267.T), Volkswagen Group (VOW.DE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Li Auto-w (2015.HK), Hero Motocorp (HEROMOTOCO.NS), Shimano (7309.T), Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles (TMPV.NS), Seres (9927.HK), Great Wall Motor (601633.SS).
Is Subaru expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.0× against a peer median of 11.7×, 9th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -8 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Subaru stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +15.7% against -15.4% for the median peer; over one year -15.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.