Loading…

Oshkosh CorpOSKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Motor Vehicles

Maker of specialty trucks and access equipment, including fire apparatus, refuse trucks, military vehicles and aerial work platforms (JLG).

Momentum neutral 44
Mkt cap
$8.19B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$106M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.9 pp
WACC 10.5%
Hurdle
-4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB / BBB+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
88 days
2 Feb 2027
Close · USD$134.36
1D-1.8%
1W-4.0%
1M+5.5%
3M-13.5%
6M-2.6%
YTD+7.0%
1Y+7.5%
ATR %4.3%
Beta1.28
52w lowhigh25.6% off high

What Oshkosh does

Maker of specialty trucks and access equipment, including fire apparatus, refuse trucks, military vehicles and aerial work platforms (JLG).

Access equipment, sold mainly to rental fleets, is the largest and most cyclical line. Fire trucks and refuse trucks are bought by municipalities, and military vehicles under government contracts, both with order backlogs that smooth deliveries.

Products and services

  • Access Equipment (JLG aerial lifts/telehandlers)
  • Vocational (fire apparatus, refuse trucks, concrete mixers)
  • Defense (military trucks)

Customers

  • Fire departments/municipalities
  • Construction/rental equipment companies
  • US military

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Specialty vehicle manufacturing
  • Fire/emergency, refuse, defense and…

What could go right

  • Construction/rental equipment replacement cycle
  • Defense vehicle contract wins

What could go wrong

  • Construction equipment cycle sensitivity
  • Municipal budget constraints for fire apparatus

Moat: narrow (brand, customer qualification, scale). Leading brands (JLG, Pierce fire apparatus) with long municipal/military procurement relationships and qualification hurdles.

Headquarters: Oshkosh, Wisconsin, USA · Founded: 1917 · Employees: 18,400

Named competitors

Oshkosh at a glance

Size Oshkosh (OSK) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Motor Vehicles) with a market value of $8.19B, the 870th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $134.36 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.6%, against -18.7% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 3.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.1%); the operating margin is 6.8% (peer median 3.8%).

Valuation It trades at 11.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.1× (6th cheapest of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.9 points above its cost of capital (10.5% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $11.8B at 30 Sep 2026, down 5% on a year earlier — 1.1 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Oshkosh has 2 bonds outstanding ($600M), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BBB+ at a weighted spread of 70 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 4.1% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026OSK 100Peer median 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Oshkosh against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Oshkosh financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$10.8B$10.4B$10.7B$9.65B$8.28B
Revenue growth—-3%+11%+16%—
Gross profit$1.60B$1.94B$2.08B$1.77B$1.16B
EBITDA$1.04B$1.20B$1.27B$989M$478M
Net income$498M$647M$681M$598M$174M
Free cash flow$942M$572M$262M$274M$322M
Capital expenditure$191M$212M$288M$325M$280M
Total debt$1.10B$1.38B$1.23B$1.08B$853M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Oshkosh competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-10%0%+10%+20%9866VFSATHERENERGPAH3C077202603129RNO0006259868FSS72726000669863223860112772017309HEROMOTOCOOSK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Oshkosh is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%0×50×100×150×PAH3C077202603129RNO000625FSS60006698636011277201TMPVHEROMOTOCOOSKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Oshkosh is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%0%50%100%150%PAH3C07603129FSS6000669863OSKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Oshkosh is the large dot.

Oshkosh competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (OSK vs TEX vs MTU.PA vs DOV)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Oshkosh OSK$8.19B-3%+4%7%11.2×4.7%
Terex TEX$6.18B-14%+40%7%9.9×12.1%
Manitou BF MTU.PA$882M-6%+8%6%8.6×-3.6%
Dover DOV$27.1B-7%+8%18%17.6×12.2%

How Oshkosh compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Oshkosh against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureOSKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+5.5%+2.5%9th highest of 21
6-month return-2.6%-18.7%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-25.6%-32.4%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.9%+8.1%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin6.8%3.8%8th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.2×19.1×6th cheapest of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.7%3.8%5th most demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.7%+10.3%4th lowest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.1 pp-4.9 pp6th least demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.9 pp-1.7 pp7th highest of 19
EV / EBITDA8.4×8.2×6th cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA0.5×1.7×4th least indebted of 12
Bond spread70 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Oshkosh OSKUnited States$8.19B-3%+4%7%11.2×4.7%+8.7%
NIO 9866.HKHong Kong$7.60B-46%+70%-4%n/an/an/a
VinFast Auto VFSUnited States$7.60B-25%+74%-86%n/an/an/a
Ather Energy ATHERENERG.NSIndia$7.57B+101%+63%-7%n/an/an/a
Porsche Automobil Holding SE Pref PAH3.DEGermany$8.98B-19%+13%108%33.4×9.4%+2.4%
Jardine Cycle & Carriage C07.SISingapore$7.36B-28%-11%10%8.2×-7.8%+8.9%
Isuzu Motors 7202.TJapan$9.26B-1%+5%6%8.8×n/an/a
Zhejiang CFMoto Power 603129.SSChina$7.23B+16%+40%11%19.9×-3.9%+34.5%
Renault RNO.PAFrance$9.39B+2%+6%6%4.9×3.4%+5.9%
Chongqing Changan Automobile 000625.SZChina$9.51B-25%-7%0%28.5×n/an/a
XPeng 9868.HKHong Kong$9.51B-37%+29%-7%n/an/an/a
Federal Signal FSSUnited States$6.92B-4%+24%17%20.1×11.8%+14.0%
Yamaha Motor 7272.TJapan$10.1B+54%+10%6%9.3×4.2%+11.5%
Yutong Bus 600066.SSChina$10.1B-12%+3%14%11.5×-10.0%+13.8%
Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology 9863.HKHong Kong$6.34B-25%+71%-1%16.1×-14.5%+150.7%
Guangzhou Automobile 2238.HKHong Kong$6.28B-27%0%-17%n/an/an/a
Seres 601127.SSChina$11.0B-51%-6%-4%139.8×n/an/a
Nissan Motor 7201.TJapan$5.98B-24%-1%2%23.1×n/an/a
Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles TMPV.NSIndia$11.4B-19%-22%0%10.7×n/an/a
Shimano 7309.TJapan$11.5B+29%+5%12%35.8×6.0%+4.3%
Hero Motocorp HEROMOTOCO.NSIndia$11.7B+3%+27%12%19.1×14.1%+9.2%

Oshkosh bonds and credit

Oshkosh has 2 bonds outstanding with $600M face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BBB+. Weighted yield 5.17%, a spread of 70 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Oshkosh backlog

Oshkosh reported $11.8B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, down 5% from a year earlier and down 4% from the previous quarter. That is 1.1 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 0.82.

Questions

Who are Oshkosh's main competitors?
Named competitors: Terex Corporation (TEX), REV Group (private or unlisted), Manitou Group (MTU.PA), Dover (DOV). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes NIO (9866.HK), VinFast Auto (VFS), Ather Energy (ATHERENERG.NS), Porsche Automobil Holding SE Pref (PAH3.DE), Jardine Cycle & Carriage (C07.SI), Isuzu Motors (7202.T).
Is Oshkosh expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.2× against a peer median of 19.1×, 6th cheapest of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Oshkosh stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.6% against -18.7% for the median peer; over one year +7.5%.
What is Oshkosh's backlog?
Oshkosh's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $11.8B at 30 Sep 2026, -5% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.