Loading…

Lpp S.a.LPP.WACompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Poland · PLN·Consumer Discretionary›Apparel/Footwear Retail

Polish clothing retailer operating multiple apparel brands (Reserved, Cropp, House, Mohito, Sinsay) across physical stores and e-commerce in Europe.

≈ A Polish Inditex-lite, multi-brand fast fashion retailerMomentum leader 94
Mkt cap
$13.0B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
69%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$29.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.2 pp
WACC 13.7%
Hurdle
-7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
27 days
3 Dec 2026
Close · PLNPLN 27,480
1D-2.1%
1W+2.8%
1M+12.6%
3M+22.5%
6M+35.8%
YTD+32.0%
1Y+56.0%
ATR %2.6%
52w lowhigh2.1% off high

What Lpp does

Polish clothing retailer operating multiple apparel brands (Reserved, Cropp, House, Mohito, Sinsay) across physical stores and e-commerce in Europe.

In one line: A Polish Inditex-lite, multi-brand fast fashion retailer.

Products and services

  • Reserved
  • Sinsay
  • Cropp
  • House / Mohito

Customers

  • Value and fast-fashion shoppers across Central/Eas

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Apparel retail
  • Fast fashion brand portfolio
  • Design, sourcing, store & online retail

What could go right

  • Sinsay brand expansion beyond Poland
  • CEE consumer spending growth

What could go wrong

  • Russia/Belarus exposure history
  • Fast-fashion competitive pricing pressure

Moat: narrow (brand, scale, distribution). Multi-brand portfolio gives shelf coverage across price points in CEE markets Inditex/H&M serve less densely.

Headquarters: Gdansk, Poland · Founded: 1991 · Employees: 37,445

Named competitors

Lpp at a glance

Size Lpp (LPP.WA) is a Poland Consumer Discretionary company (Apparel/Footwear Retail) with a market value of $13.0B, the 10th largest of 83 Poland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at PLN 27,480 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 35.8%, against +10.6% for the median peer and +14.3% for the Poland market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 17 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 15.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.6%); the operating margin is 12.9% (peer median 9.6%).

Valuation It trades at 17.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.8× (8th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +24%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.2 points above its cost of capital (13.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026LPP.WA 133Peer median 111
Six months, rebased to 100: Lpp against the median of its 16 peers (local-currency closes).

Lpp financials

Reported figures in PLN; fiscal year ends 2026-01-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenuePLN 24.6BPLN 23.1BPLN 20.2BPLN 17.4BPLN 15.9B
Revenue growth—+14%+16%+9%—
Gross profitPLN 11.9BPLN 10.8BPLN 9.03BPLN 7.59BPLN 6.88B
EBITDAPLN 5.49BPLN 4.68BPLN 4.15BPLN 3.66BPLN 2.34B
Net incomePLN 1.94BPLN 1.50BPLN 1.75BPLN 1.61BPLN 833M
Free cash flowPLN 2.92BPLN 1.13BPLN 1.98BPLN 3.03B-PLN 711M
Capital expenditurePLN 2.99BPLN 3.17BPLN 1.82BPLN 1.09BPLN 1.16B
Total debtPLN 7.76BPLN 10.3BPLN 9.11BPLN 6.86BPLN 6.81B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Lpp competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+20%ATZMEESHOBURLALETRENTVSXYGAPURBNTPRANFJDHM-B8227VMMBOOTLPP.WA6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Lpp is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×60×80×ATZBURLALETRENTVSXYGAPURBNTPRANFJDHM-BVMMBOOTAEOLPP.WARevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Lpp is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%ATZBURLALETRENTVSXYGAPURBNTPRANFJD8227VMMBOOTLPP.WAGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Lpp is the large dot.

Lpp competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LPP.WA vs ITX.MC vs HM-B.ST vs ZAL.DE)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Lpp LPP.WA$13.0B+36%+15%13%17.4×17.5%
Industria de Diseno Textil ITX.MC$206B+20%+6%20%27.3×15.3%
H&M Hennes & Mauritz HM-B.ST$29.1B+12%-4%9%22.3×4.5%
Zalando ZAL.DE$7.64B+42%+18%4%19.6×7.6%

How Lpp compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Lpp against its 16 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLPP.WAPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+12.6%+7.1%6th highest of 17
6-month return+35.8%+10.6%5th highest of 17
Distance from 52-week high-2.1%-11.3%2nd highest of 17
Revenue growth (TTM)+15.2%+10.6%6th highest of 17
Operating margin12.9%9.6%6th highest of 17
Forward P/E17.4×15.8×8th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)17.5%9.0%7th most demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+24.1%+12.3%3rd highest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-6.6 pp-4.5 pp6th least demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.2 pp+2.8 pp6th highest of 17
EV / EBITDA10.5×11.1×8th cheapest of 16
Net debt / EBITDA1.2×1.3×8th least indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Lpp LPP.WAPoland$13.0B+36%+15%13%17.4×17.5%+24.1%
Aritzia ATZ.TOCanada$12.5B+9%+40%16%27.1×22.0%+34.0%
Meesho MEESHO.NSIndia$11.4B+17%+34%-9%n/an/an/a
Burlington Stores BURLUnited States$15.5B-19%+11%8%20.5×18.2%+14.9%
Allegro.eu ALE.WAPoland$15.5B+97%+8%20%30.8×22.1%+23.4%
Trent TRENT.NSIndia$17.4B+8%+18%12%75.1×60.1%+50.6%
Victoria's Secret & VSXYUnited States$8.62B+125%+10%8%21.4×20.0%+3.9%
Gap GAPUnited States$7.55B-8%+1%11%8.4×-2.3%+2.2%
Urban Outfitters URBNUnited States$7.26B+18%+11%10%13.1×6.9%+12.3%
Tapestry TPRUnited States$26.4B0%+14%24%15.8×9.0%+6.9%
Abercrombie & Fitch ANFUnited States$6.35B+57%+5%14%12.1×-2.7%+11.0%
JD Sports Fashion JD..LUnited Kingdom$6.03B+37%+2%7%9.0×1.4%+15.5%
H&M Hennes & Mauritz HM-B.STSweden$29.1B+12%-4%9%22.3×4.5%+4.1%
SHIMAMURA 8227.TJapan$4.69B+2%+5%9%14.3×-9.9%+5.2%
Vishal Mega Mart VMM.NSIndia$4.67B-25%+18%9%43.8×32.3%+19.4%
Boot Barn BOOTUnited States$3.92B-20%+17%14%14.6×14.3%+20.3%
American Eagle Outfitters AEOUnited States$3.34B+19%+8%9%11.1×0.9%+8.1%

Questions

Who are Lpp's main competitors?
Named competitors: Inditex (Zara) (ITX.MC), H&M (HM-B.ST), Zalando (ZAL.DE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Aritzia (ATZ.TO), Meesho (MEESHO.NS), Burlington Stores (BURL), Allegro.eu (ALE.WA), Trent (TRENT.NS), Victoria's Secret & (VSXY).
Is Lpp expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.4× against a peer median of 15.8×, 8th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +24%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Lpp stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +35.8% against +10.6% for the median peer; over one year +56.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.