Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 8227.T SHIMAMURA Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

SHIMAMURA Co., Ltd.8227.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Apparel/Footwear Retail

Japanese value apparel retail chain selling family clothing and daily goods at discount prices nationwide.

≈ Japan's Ross Stores/TJX for apparelMomentum strong 61
Mkt cap
$4.69B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
56%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$15.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+11.0 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-15 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
45 days
21 Dec 2026
Close · JPY¥3,344
1D-4.7%
1W+1.3%
1M+2.6%
3M-1.5%
6M+2.1%
YTD-1.8%
1Y+6.4%
ATR %2.4%
52w lowhigh11.5% off high

What SHIMAMURA does

Japanese value apparel retail chain selling family clothing and daily goods at discount prices nationwide.

Sells mostly its own-label clothing, designed in-house and made by outside factories overseas, mainly in Asia, then sells it through roadside and shopping-centre stores, so profit depends on buying costs, markdowns and the yen against sourcing currencies. Fashion Center Shimamura is its main format, alongside Avail and Birthday.

In one line: Japan's Ross Stores/TJX for apparel.

Products and services

  • Family/value apparel retail
  • Home goods/daily necessities

Customers

  • Value-conscious families across Japan

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer Discretionary
  • Specialty retail
  • Value apparel retail

What could go right

  • Value retail demand in a cost-conscious economy
  • Store count growth

What could go wrong

  • Apparel fashion-trend risk
  • Wage/rent cost inflation

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution). Large low-cost store network and efficient supply chain support everyday-low-price positioning.

Headquarters: Saitama, Japan · Founded: 1953 · Employees: 3,393

Named competitors

SHIMAMURA at a glance

Size SHIMAMURA (8227.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Apparel/Footwear Retail) with a market value of $4.69B, the 254th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,344 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 2.1%, against +16.2% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.2%); the operating margin is 8.8% (peer median 9.6%).

Valuation It trades at 14.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.8× (9th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -15 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.0 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 21 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1178227.T 103
Six months, rebased to 100: SHIMAMURA against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

SHIMAMURA financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-02-28. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥715B¥701B¥667B¥636B¥618B
Revenue growth—+5%+5%+3%—
Gross profit¥243B¥238B¥226B¥214B¥211B
EBITDA¥70.8B¥68.5B¥65.3B¥61.2B¥59.2B
Net income¥45.8B¥44.5B¥41.9B¥40.1B¥38.0B
Free cash flow¥10.7B¥24.7B¥41.1B¥33.4B¥37.2B
Capital expenditure¥42.1B¥24.2B¥11.7B¥7.75B¥4.38B
Total debt¥0¥0¥0¥0¥0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

SHIMAMURA competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%-10%0%+10%+20%VMMBOOTJDANFAEOURBNGAPVSXY301381METROBRANDBKECPRIMDVMEESHOATZOVS2726PMVBURL8227.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. SHIMAMURA is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×VMMBOOTJDANFAEOURBNGAPVSXY301381METROBRANDCPRIMDVATZOVSLPPPMV8227.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. SHIMAMURA is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%VMMBOOTJDANFAEOURBNGAPVSXY301381METROBRANDBKECPRIMDVATZOVSLPP2726PMVBURL8227.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. SHIMAMURA is the large dot.

SHIMAMURA competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (8227.T vs 8219.T vs 9983.T vs 7545.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
SHIMAMURA 8227.T$4.69B+2%+5%9%14.3×-9.9%
AOYAMA TRADING 8219.T$704M-7%-2%6%13.3×-1.6%
Fast Retailing 9983.T$155B+6%+17%18%41.2×23.8%
Nishimatsuya Chain 7545.T$725M-6%+5%5%13.8×-21.2%

How SHIMAMURA compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

SHIMAMURA against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure8227.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.6%+7.5%7th lowest of 21
6-month return+2.1%+16.2%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-11.5%-24.6%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.2%+10.2%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin8.8%9.6%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E14.3×14.8×9th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-9.9%14.3%2nd least demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.2%+14.9%5th lowest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-15.1 pp-4.5 pp2nd least demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+11.0 pp+1.2 pp5th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA7.2×10.5×6th cheapest of 19
Net debt / EBITDA-3.3×1.3×least indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
SHIMAMURA 8227.TJapan$4.69B+2%+5%9%14.3×-9.9%+5.2%
Vishal Mega Mart VMM.NSIndia$4.67B-25%+18%9%43.8×32.3%+19.4%
Boot Barn BOOTUnited States$3.92B-20%+17%14%14.6×14.3%+20.3%
JD Sports Fashion JD..LUnited Kingdom$6.03B+37%+2%7%9.0×1.4%+15.5%
Abercrombie & Fitch ANFUnited States$6.35B+57%+5%14%12.1×-2.7%+11.0%
American Eagle Outfitters AEOUnited States$3.34B+19%+8%9%11.1×0.9%+8.1%
Urban Outfitters URBNUnited States$7.26B+18%+11%10%13.1×6.9%+12.3%
Gap GAPUnited States$7.55B-8%+1%11%8.4×-2.3%+2.2%
Victoria's Secret & VSXYUnited States$8.62B+125%+10%8%21.4×20.0%+3.9%
Sailvan Times 301381.SZChina$2.39B+25%+14%4%25.4×14.9%+17.6%
Metro Brands METROBRAND.NSIndia$2.39B-20%+16%19%49.2×34.1%+29.1%
Buckle BKEUnited States$2.16B-20%+6%22%10.3×-5.2%+7.6%
Capri CPRIUnited States$2.12B+11%-14%3%9.4×21.3%-3.1%
Modivo MDV.WAPoland$2.01B+29%+4%2%34.1×23.3%+15.9%
Meesho MEESHO.NSIndia$11.4B+17%+34%-9%n/an/an/a
Aritzia ATZ.TOCanada$12.5B+9%+40%16%27.1×22.0%+34.0%
OVS OVS.MIItaly$1.74B+15%+10%7%14.8×12.8%+11.4%
Lpp LPP.WAPoland$13.0B+36%+15%13%17.4×17.5%+24.1%
PAL 2726.TJapan$1.58B-4%+7%11%13.6×-15.4%+16.7%
Premier Investments PMV.AXAustralia$1.57B+22%-3%14%14.9×9.4%-11.0%
Burlington Stores BURLUnited States$15.5B-19%+11%8%20.5×18.2%+14.9%

Questions

Who are SHIMAMURA's main competitors?
Named competitors: Aoyama Trading (8219.T), Uniqlo (Fast Retailing) (9983.T), Nishimatsuya Chain (7545.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Vishal Mega Mart (VMM.NS), Boot Barn (BOOT), JD Sports Fashion (JD..L), Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF), American Eagle Outfitters (AEO), Urban Outfitters (URBN).
Is SHIMAMURA expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.3× against a peer median of 14.8×, 9th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -15 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has SHIMAMURA stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +2.1% against +16.2% for the median peer; over one year +6.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.