Loading…

TrentTRENT.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Consumer & Retail›Apparel/Footwear Retail

Tata Group's fashion and value-retail chain, running Westside and Zudio stores across India.

≈ A Tata-owned Indian Zara/Uniqlo-style value fashion retailerMomentum strong 70
Mkt cap
$17.4B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
36%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$30.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
75.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.4 pp
WACC 19.5%
Hurdle
+10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
96 days
10 Feb 2027
Close · INR₹3,079
1D+0.8%
1W+2.0%
1M+6.5%
3M-0.9%
6M+7.5%
YTD+7.9%
1Y-2.7%
ATR %2.6%
Beta1.20
52w lowhigh9.4% off high

What Trent does

Tata Group's fashion and value-retail chain, running Westside and Zudio stores across India.

Sells mostly its own-label clothing and accessories through its own stores, so it earns the full retail margin rather than a brand's wholesale share, with Zudio's low prices and fast-turning stock driving most store growth. Tata group companies are its largest shareholders.

In one line: A Tata-owned Indian Zara/Uniqlo-style value fashion retailer.

Products and services

  • Westside (lifestyle/fashion stores)
  • Zudio (value fashion stores)
  • Star (grocery, JV)

Customers

  • Indian middle-class fashion/value shoppers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer & retail
  • Fashion/apparel retail
  • Store-based & online retail

What could go right

  • Rapid Zudio store rollout
  • Rising Indian discretionary/fashion spending

What could go wrong

  • Execution risk in rapid store expansion
  • Competition from Reliance Retail and e-commerce

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution, scale). Tata Group backing plus a fast-growing value-fashion chain (Zudio) gives distribution scale in Indian retail.

Headquarters: Mumbai, India · Founded: 1998 · Employees: 38,417

Named competitors

Trent at a glance

Size Trent (TRENT.NS) is an India Consumer Discretionary company (Apparel/Footwear Retail) with a market value of $17.4B, the 58th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹3,079 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 7.5%, against +14.8% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 15 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 18.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.6%); the operating margin is 12.0% (peer median 9.6%).

Valuation It trades at 75.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.4× (most expensive of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 60% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +51%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.4 points above its cost of capital (19.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 115TRENT.NS 109
Six months, rebased to 100: Trent against the median of its 14 peers (local-currency closes).

Trent financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹220B₹201B₹171B₹124B₹82.3B
Revenue growth—+17%+38%+50%—
Gross profit₹68.0B₹51.5B₹44.6B₹31.8B₹20.2B
EBITDA₹42.2B₹37.4B₹28.1B₹19.5B₹11.0B
Net income₹19.0B₹17.2B₹15.5B₹14.9B₹4.45B
Free cash flown/a₹7.83B₹2.66B₹3.80B-₹1.11B
Capital expendituren/a₹17.6B₹12.7B₹7.37B₹5.03B
Total debt₹23.3B₹25.6B₹22.4B₹17.5B₹44.6B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Trent competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+20%ALEBURLLPPATZMEESHOTPRHM-BVSXYGAPURBNANFJD8227VMMTRENT.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Trent is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×60×80×ALEBURLLPPATZTPRHM-BVSXYGAPURBNANFJDVMMTRENT.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Trent is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%ALEBURLLPPATZTPRHM-BVSXYGAPURBNANF8227VMMTRENT.NSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Trent is the large dot.

Trent competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (TRENT.NS vs ABFRL.NS vs SHOPERSTOP.NS vs VMM.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Trent TRENT.NS$17.4B+8%+18%12%75.1×60.1%
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail ABFRL.NS$503M-42%-27%-8%n/an/a
Shoppers Stop SHOPERSTOP.NS$428M+2%+9%4%210.3×17.1%
Vishal Mega Mart VMM.NS$4.67B-25%+18%9%43.8×32.3%
V-Mart Retail VMART.NS$636M+14%+18%6%38.9×36.5%
Avenue Supermarts DMART.NS$23.6B-22%+16%6%63.8×n/a

How Trent compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Trent against its 14 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTRENT.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+6.5%+7.8%8th highest of 15
6-month return+7.5%+14.8%6th lowest of 15
Distance from 52-week high-9.4%-10.4%7th highest of 15
Revenue growth (TTM)+18.4%+10.6%3rd highest of 15
Operating margin12.0%9.6%6th highest of 15
Forward P/E75.1×17.4×most expensive of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)60.1%9.0%most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+50.6%+12.3%highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+9.5 pp-4.5 pp3rd most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.4 pp+6.0 pp6th lowest of 15
EV / EBITDA39.3×10.5×most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA0.3×1.2×3rd least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Trent TRENT.NSIndia$17.4B+8%+18%12%75.1×60.1%+50.6%
Allegro.eu ALE.WAPoland$15.5B+97%+8%20%30.8×22.1%+23.4%
Burlington Stores BURLUnited States$15.5B-19%+11%8%20.5×18.2%+14.9%
Lpp LPP.WAPoland$13.0B+36%+15%13%17.4×17.5%+24.1%
Aritzia ATZ.TOCanada$12.5B+9%+40%16%27.1×22.0%+34.0%
Meesho MEESHO.NSIndia$11.4B+17%+34%-9%n/an/an/a
Tapestry TPRUnited States$26.4B0%+14%24%15.8×9.0%+6.9%
H&M Hennes & Mauritz HM-B.STSweden$29.1B+12%-4%9%22.3×4.5%+4.1%
Victoria's Secret & VSXYUnited States$8.62B+125%+10%8%21.4×20.0%+3.9%
Gap GAPUnited States$7.55B-8%+1%11%8.4×-2.3%+2.2%
Urban Outfitters URBNUnited States$7.26B+18%+11%10%13.1×6.9%+12.3%
Abercrombie & Fitch ANFUnited States$6.35B+57%+5%14%12.1×-2.7%+11.0%
JD Sports Fashion JD..LUnited Kingdom$6.03B+37%+2%7%9.0×1.4%+15.5%
SHIMAMURA 8227.TJapan$4.69B+2%+5%9%14.3×-9.9%+5.2%
Vishal Mega Mart VMM.NSIndia$4.67B-25%+18%9%43.8×32.3%+19.4%

Questions

Who are Trent's main competitors?
Named competitors: Reliance Retail (private) (private or unlisted), Aditya Birla Fashion (ABFRL.NS), Shoppers Stop (SHOPERSTOP.NS), Vishal Mega Mart (VMM.NS), V-Mart Retail (VMART.NS), Avenue Supermarts (DMART.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Allegro.eu (ALE.WA), Burlington Stores (BURL), Lpp (LPP.WA), Aritzia (ATZ.TO), Meesho (MEESHO.NS), Tapestry (TPR).
Is Trent expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 75.1× against a peer median of 17.4×, most expensive of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 60% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +51%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Trent stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +7.5% against +14.8% for the median peer; over one year -2.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.