Loading…

Tapestry, Inc.TPRCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Apparel/Footwear Retail

House of accessible-luxury brands—Coach, Kate Spade, Stuart Weitzman—selling handbags, accessories and footwear.

Momentum neutral 46
Mkt cap
$26.4B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$330M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+32.2 pp
WACC 11.3%
Hurdle
+2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB+ / BBB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
97 days
11 Feb 2027
Close · USD$132.80
1D-1.0%
1W+14.2%
1M+14.7%
3M-19.4%
6M-0.2%
YTD+4.5%
1Y+22.6%
ATR %3.4%
Beta0.73
52w lowhigh19.4% off high

What Tapestry does

House of accessible-luxury brands—Coach, Kate Spade, Stuart Weitzman—selling handbags, accessories and footwear.

Sells mostly through its own full-price stores, outlets and websites rather than through department stores, so brand control matters, and Coach carries the group. Originally Coach Inc., it became Tapestry by buying Kate Spade in 2017; a planned purchase of Capri (Michael Kors) was abandoned in 2024 after a US court blocked it.

Products and services

  • Coach
  • Kate Spade
  • Stuart Weitzman

Customers

  • Aspirational/accessible-luxury consumers globally

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Accessible luxury accessories
  • Multi-brand design and global…

What could go right

  • Coach brand momentum with younger consumers
  • China/international growth

What could go wrong

  • Kate Spade brand underperformance
  • Discretionary luxury spending sensitivity

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution). Established heritage brands, especially Coach, with strong outlet/DTC distribution support pricing power.

Headquarters: New York, New York, US · Founded: 1941 · Employees: 20,600

Named competitors

Tapestry at a glance

Size Tapestry (TPR) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Apparel/Footwear Retail) with a market value of $26.4B, the 406th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $132.80 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 0.2%, against +12.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 12 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 14.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.0%); the operating margin is 24.0% (peer median 10.8%).

Valuation It trades at 15.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.9× (3rd cheapest of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 32.2 points above its cost of capital (11.3% WACC).

Credit Tapestry has 3 bonds outstanding ($2.00B), rated BBB+ by the agencies and trading like BBB at a weighted spread of 98 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 8.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 114TPR 100
Six months, rebased to 100: Tapestry against the median of its 11 peers (local-currency closes).

Tapestry financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$8.00B$8.00B$7.01B$6.67B$6.66B
Revenue growth—+14%+5%0%—
Gross profit$6.00B$5.99B$5.03B$4.63B$4.72B
EBITDA$2.13B$2.13B$1.48B$1.55B$1.36B
Net income$1.53B$1.53B$183M$816M$936M
Free cash flow$1.81B$1.81B$1.09B$1.15B$791M
Capital expenditure$166M$166M$123M$109M$184M
Total debt$3.95B$3.95B$3.90B$8.77B$3.29B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tapestry competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+20%HM-BTRENTALEBURLLPPATZMEESHOROSTVSXYGAPURBNTPR6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tapestry is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×60×80×HM-BTRENTALEBURLLPPATZROSTVSXYGAPURBNTPRRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tapestry is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%HM-BTRENTALEBURLLPPATZROSTVSXYGAPURBNTPRGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Tapestry is the large dot.

Tapestry competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (TPR vs RL vs CPRI vs MC.PA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Tapestry TPR$26.4B0%+14%24%15.8×9.0%
Ralph Lauren RL$22.4B+5%+15%17%18.6×11.0%
Capri CPRI$2.12B+11%-14%3%9.4×21.3%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton MC.PA$226B-11%-4%22%18.6×10.2%

How Tapestry compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tapestry against its 11 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTPRPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+14.7%+6.5%4th highest of 12
6-month return-0.2%+12.1%3rd lowest of 12
Distance from 52-week high-19.4%-9.4%3rd lowest of 12
Revenue growth (TTM)+14.2%+11.0%5th highest of 12
Operating margin24.0%10.8%highest of 12
Forward P/E15.8×21.9×3rd cheapest of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.0%17.8%4th least demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.9%+13.8%4th lowest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+2.1 pp-1.5 pp4th most demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+32.2 pp+4.9 pphighest of 12
EV / EBITDA13.7×14.5×5th cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA1.3×0.9×5th most indebted of 11
Bond spread98 bp122 bp2nd tightest of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Tapestry TPRUnited States$26.4B0%+14%24%15.8×9.0%+6.9%
H&M Hennes & Mauritz HM-B.STSweden$29.1B+12%-4%9%22.3×4.5%+4.1%
Trent TRENT.NSIndia$17.4B+8%+18%12%75.1×60.1%+50.6%
Allegro.eu ALE.WAPoland$15.5B+97%+8%20%30.8×22.1%+23.4%
Burlington Stores BURLUnited States$15.5B-19%+11%8%20.5×18.2%+14.9%
Lpp LPP.WAPoland$13.0B+36%+15%13%17.4×17.5%+24.1%
Aritzia ATZ.TOCanada$12.5B+9%+40%16%27.1×22.0%+34.0%
Meesho MEESHO.NSIndia$11.4B+17%+34%-9%n/an/an/a
Ross Stores ROSTUnited States$73.8B+3%+14%13%27.0×11.0%+12.7%
Victoria's Secret & VSXYUnited States$8.62B+125%+10%8%21.4×20.0%+3.9%
Gap GAPUnited States$7.55B-8%+1%11%8.4×-2.3%+2.2%
Urban Outfitters URBNUnited States$7.26B+18%+11%10%13.1×6.9%+12.3%

Tapestry bonds and credit

Tapestry has 3 bonds outstanding with $2.00B face value. The agencies rate it BBB+; its bonds trade like BBB. Weighted yield 5.64%, a spread of 98 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Tapestry's main competitors?
Named competitors: Ralph Lauren (RL), Capri Holdings (CPRI), LVMH (smaller leather goods) (MC.PA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes H&M Hennes & Mauritz (HM-B.ST), Trent (TRENT.NS), Allegro.eu (ALE.WA), Burlington Stores (BURL), Lpp (LPP.WA), Aritzia (ATZ.TO).
Is Tapestry expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.8× against a peer median of 21.9×, 3rd cheapest of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Tapestry stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -0.2% against +12.1% for the median peer; over one year +22.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.