Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › EMBRAC-B.ST Embracer Group AB Class BOpen in the cockpit ↗

Embracer Group AB Class BEMBRAC-B.STCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Sweden · SEK·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Swedish holding company that owns and publishes video games through many studios, including THQ Nordic, Crystal Dynamics and Warhorse.

≈ A video-game holding company like a smaller Take-Two InteractiveMomentum leader 93
Mkt cap
$2.08B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
58%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.24M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-41.4 pp
WACC 7.3%
Hurdle
-22 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · SEKSEK 95.66
1D+0.4%
1W+0.6%
1M+13.8%
3M+36.5%
6M+37.1%
YTD+57.6%
1Y-1.2%
ATR %3.3%
52w lowhigh1.4% off high

What Embracer does

Swedish holding company that owns and publishes video games through many studios, including THQ Nordic, Crystal Dynamics and Warhorse.

Spent heavily on buying studios and franchises until 2022, then reversed: it closed or sold studios, including Gearbox to Take-Two in 2024, spun off its tabletop arm Asmodee in 2025 and has since spun off Coffee Stain. A plan announced in May 2026 would list its Tomb Raider and Middle-earth franchises as a separate company in 2027.

In one line: A video-game holding company like a smaller Take-Two Interactive.

Products and services

  • PC/console game publishing (THQ Nordic, Crystal Dynamics, Wa
  • Mobile games
  • Entertainment IP licensing (Middle-earth Enterprises, Dark H

Customers

  • Gamers (PC/console/mobile)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Video games
  • Game development and publishing…

What could go right

  • Successful new game launches
  • Post-breakup operational focus/cost discipline

What could go wrong

  • Game-development delays/hit-or-miss economics
  • Legacy debt/restructuring overhang from prior expansion

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, brand). Owns valuable game franchises and studio talent, but game hits are unpredictable and the company has undergone a major breakup/restructuring.

Headquarters: Karlstad, Sweden · Founded: 2007 · Employees: 6,096

Named competitors

Embracer at a glance

Size Embracer (EMBRAC-B.ST) is a Sweden Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $2.08B, the 82nd largest of 221 Sweden companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at SEK 95.66 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 37.1%, against +5.8% for the median peer and +8.2% for the Sweden market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 31.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.0%); the operating margin is -42.5% (peer median 0.1%).

Valuation It trades at 16.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 28.2× (3rd cheapest of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -22 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 41.4 points below its cost of capital (7.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026EMBRAC-B.ST 140Peer median 105
Six months, rebased to 100: Embracer against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Embracer financials

Reported figures in SEK; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueSEK 16.9BSEK 15.9BSEK 21.3BSEK 27.4BSEK 37.7B
Revenue growth—-25%-22%-27%—
Gross profit-SEK 7.18B-SEK 7.64B-SEK 4.95B-SEK 8.16BSEK 273M
EBITDASEK 3.53BSEK 3.27BSEK 3.73BSEK 5.61BSEK 6.53B
Net income-SEK 5.37B-SEK 5.82BSEK 5.96B-SEK 18.2BSEK 4.45B
Free cash flowSEK 2.32BSEK 2.37BSEK 2.54BSEK 5.47BSEK 4.88B
Capital expenditureSEK 2.91BSEK 3.01BSEK 3.54BSEK 7.07BSEK 7.00B
Total debtSEK 2.04BSEK 1.65BSEK 2.35BSEK 21.2BSEK 21.7B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Embracer competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%688158AMPL6006331860FIVNPBIDV3004594686002354PINELABS603533LIFE002405300315KAROPLNW2026SDGREMBRAC-B.ST6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Embracer is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×200×400×688158AMPL6006331860FIVNPBI002354PINELABS603533LIFE600271300315KAROPLNWEMBRAC-B.STRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Embracer is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%AMPL6006331860FIVNPBIDV3004594686002354603533300315KAROPLNWEMBRAC-B.STGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Embracer is the large dot.

Embracer competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (EMBRAC-B.ST vs TTWO vs EA vs PDX.ST)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Embracer EMBRAC-B.ST$2.08B+37%-31%-43%16.4×-9.8%
Take-Two Interactive TTWO$40.2B-3%+15%-1%26.7×44.7%
Electronic Arts EAn/a+3%n/an/an/an/a
Paradox Interactive PDX.ST$1.54B+6%+13%6%25.3×20.8%

How Embracer compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Embracer against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureEMBRAC-B.STPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+13.8%+5.8%4th highest of 21
6-month return+37.1%+5.8%4th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-1.4%-31.3%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-31.5%+12.0%lowest of 21
Operating margin-42.5%0.1%5th lowest of 21
Forward P/E16.4×28.2×3rd cheapest of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-9.8%16.6%least demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+12.0%+15.8%7th lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-21.8 pp+6.5 pp2nd least demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-41.4 pp-8.9 pp4th lowest of 17
EV / EBITDA4.9×11.3×cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA-0.8×-0.8×4th least indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Embracer EMBRAC-B.STSweden$2.08B+37%-31%-43%16.4×-9.8%+12.0%
UCloud Technology 688158.SSChina$2.08B-34%+26%2%499.0×n/an/a
Amplitude AMPLUnited States$2.09B+161%+18%-27%109.2×36.9%+27.4%
Zhejiang Digital Culture Technology 600633.SSChina$2.06B-15%+14%10%20.8×15.4%-2.8%
Mobvista Incorporation 1860.HKHong Kong$2.05B-43%+26%4%19.6×-1.1%+31.9%
Five9 FIVNUnited States$2.10B+27%+9%6%8.1×17.9%+21.4%
Pitney Bowes PBIUnited States$2.11B-1%-4%25%9.6×-5.4%-11.8%
DoubleVerify DVUnited States$2.12B+23%+7%14%21.3×9.7%+25.1%
Zhejiang Jinke Tom Culture Industry 300459.SZChina$2.01B-9%-10%-108%n/a43.2%-12.5%
Justsystems 4686.TJapan$2.01B+33%+10%44%n/a-6.3%+4.6%
Tianyu Digital Technology 002354.SZChina$2.00B+31%+8%-2%135.3×25.9%+15.8%
Pine Labs PINELABS.NSIndia$1.98B-19%+50%7%79.2×n/an/a
iReader Technology 603533.SSChina$1.98B+20%+14%-2%91.2×37.2%+9.5%
Ethos Technologies LIFEUnited States$2.18B+13%+112%-16%33.9×24.1%n/a
SeeWay.ai 002405.SZChina$2.18B-32%+22%-29%n/an/an/a
Aisino 600271.SSChina$1.96B-16%-12%-24%26.2×n/an/a
Ourpalm 300315.SZChina$1.96B-3%-5%-65%125.6×55.8%-17.0%
Karooooo KAROUnited States$1.95B+25%+32%25%24.1×10.4%+17.7%
Planisware Societe anonyme PLNW.PAFrance$1.94B+46%+8%31%28.2×12.3%+16.8%
Pony AI 2026.HKHong Kong$1.93B-56%+67%-214%n/an/an/a
Schrodinger SDGRUnited States$2.23B+125%+9%-59%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Embracer's main competitors?
Named competitors: Take-Two Interactive (TTWO), Electronic Arts (EA), Paradox Interactive (PDX.ST). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes UCloud Technology (688158.SS), Amplitude (AMPL), Zhejiang Digital Culture Technology (600633.SS), Mobvista Incorporation (1860.HK), Five9 (FIVN), Pitney Bowes (PBI).
Is Embracer expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.4× against a peer median of 28.2×, 3rd cheapest of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -22 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Embracer stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +37.1% against +5.8% for the median peer; over one year -1.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.