Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › B58.SI Banyan Tree Holdings LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Banyan Tree Holdings LimitedB58.SICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Singapore · SGD·Consumer Discretionary›Hotels/Resorts/Cruise lines
Momentum laggard 2
Mkt cap
$238M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
26%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$125,414
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+3.8 pp
WACC 5.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
105 days
19 Feb 2027
Close · SGDS$0.35
1D0.0%
1W0.0%
1M-26.3%
3M-35.8%
6M-44.0%
YTD-44.0%
1Y-46.1%
ATR %4.5%
52w lowhigh49.6% off high

What Banyan Tree does

No business profile yet.

Banyan Tree at a glance

Size Banyan Tree (B58.SI) is a Singapore Consumer Discretionary company (Hotels/Resorts/Cruise lines) with a market value of $238M, the 154th largest of 186 Singapore companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at S$0.35 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 44.0%, against -5.6% for the median peer and -1.2% for the Singapore market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 24.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.2%); the operating margin is 30.8% (peer median 14.0%).

Valuation It trades at 1.6× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.4× (4th cheapest of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.8 points above its cost of capital (5.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 19 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95B58.SI 56
Six months, rebased to 100: Banyan Tree against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Banyan Tree financials

Reported figures in SGD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueS$507MS$477MS$381MS$328MS$271M
Revenue growth—+25%+16%+21%—
Gross profitS$239MS$225MS$166MS$148MS$110M
EBITDAS$193MS$179MS$133MS$44.2MS$27.2M
Net incomeS$47.1MS$42.5MS$42.1MS$31.7MS$767,000
Free cash flow-S$55.9M-S$50.6MS$24.0MS$13.8MS$72.9M
Capital expenditureS$43.0MS$48.7MS$34.7MS$27.8MS$19.0M
Total debtn/aS$489MS$404MS$416MS$372M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Banyan Tree competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-20%0%+20%B28H125JKORIENTHOTCVEO499790SAMHI3010732704000007FCMC0051B58.SI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Banyan Tree is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+500%+1,000%5×10×B28H125JKORIENTHOTCVEOALPG499790VIK1V601007000007FCMCJUNIPERELEVATE000428B58.SIRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Banyan Tree is the large dot.

Banyan Tree competitors and peer comparison

How Banyan Tree compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Banyan Tree against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureB58.SIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-26.3%-3.5%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-44.0%-5.6%2nd lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-49.6%-17.1%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+24.5%+6.2%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin30.8%14.0%2nd highest of 21
EV / Sales1.6×3.4×4th cheapest of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.8 pp-3.1 pp3rd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA4.1×10.8×cheapest of 18
Net debt / EBITDA2.0×2.4×9th least indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Banyan Tree B58.SISingapore$238M-44%+24%31%1.6×n/an/a
Bonvests B28.SISingapore$283M-8%+5%11%3.0×6.6%+13.6%
Hotel Royal H12.SISingapore$189M-3%+6%23%5.0×4.5%+19.3%
Hiap Hoe 5JK.SISingapore$184M-7%+7%9%3.4×7.5%+11.2%
Oriental Hotels ORIENTHOT.NSIndia$331M+62%+7%19%6.4×39.1%+33.6%
Civeo CVEOUnited States$354M+10%+13%3%0.8×13.8%+3.8%
PREATONI ALPG.PAFrance$362Mn/a+19%16%3.9×10.6%+16.7%
GS P&L 499790.KSSouth Korea$372M-54%+1,157%19%2.6×n/an/a
Viking Line Abp VIK1V.HEFinland$374M-6%+1%4%0.8×3.4%+20.6%
Jinling Hotel 601007.SSChina$385M-14%-2%7%1.7×3.3%+10.0%
Samhi Hotels SAMHI.NSIndia$397M+6%+12%24%4.3×n/an/a
Hotel Grand Central H18.SISingapore$403M-5%+7%12%1.6×-4.6%+9.4%
SSAW Hotels & Resorts 301073.SZChina$474M-34%+1%12%6.1×19.2%+21.4%
Ambassador Hotel,Ltd 2704.TWTaiwan$479M+3%+3%-2%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Quanxinhao 000007.SZChina$482M-40%-3%1%7.7×34.9%+54.5%
Societe Fermiere du Casino Municipal de Cannes FCMC.PAFrance$489M+8%+11%26%2.4×-6.7%+24.0%
Juniper Hotels JUNIPER.NSIndia$490M-2%+12%30%4.3×14.1%+44.5%
Elevate Campuses ELEVATE.NSIndia$498Mn/a+54%63%8.3×n/an/a
Stamford Land H07.SISingapore$530M-6%0%20%1.3×-16.2%+5.5%
Huatian Hotel 000428.SZChina$552M-6%-6%-35%10.3×n/an/a
Harbour Centre Development 0051.HKHong Kong$557M+38%+1%20%2.8×-3.9%-16.5%

Questions

Which companies are Banyan Tree's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Bonvests (B28.SI), Hotel Royal (H12.SI), Hiap Hoe (5JK.SI), Oriental Hotels (ORIENTHOT.NS), Civeo (CVEO), PREATONI (ALPG.PA), GS P&L (499790.KS), Viking Line Abp (VIK1V.HE).
Is Banyan Tree expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.6× against a peer median of 3.4×, 4th cheapest of 20 in its peer set.
How has Banyan Tree stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -44.0% against -5.6% for the median peer; over one year -46.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.