Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7735.T Screen Holdings Co LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

Screen Holdings Co Ltd7735.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Information Technology›Industrial Machinery

Maker of semiconductor wafer-cleaning equipment, plus legacy printing/graphic-arts machinery.

≈ A cleaning-tool-focused Lam ResearchMomentum laggard 2
Mkt cap
$9.20B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
80%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$232M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+10.7 pp
WACC 16.5%
Hurdle
+4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
84 days
29 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥7,778
1D+0.2%
1W-35.6%
1M-52.1%
3M-37.0%
6M-24.0%
YTD+3.0%
1Y+18.7%
ATR %11.4%
52w lowhigh60.7% off high

What Screen does

Maker of semiconductor wafer-cleaning equipment, plus legacy printing/graphic-arts machinery.

Sells single-wafer cleaning machines, which wash silicon wafers between chip-making steps and are bought in volume when chipmakers build or upgrade fabs, so orders swing with fab spending. The graphic-arts unit is a legacy of its start as a printing-equipment maker.

In one line: A cleaning-tool-focused Lam Research.

Products and services

  • Semiconductor cleaning equipment
  • Coater/developers
  • Graphic/printing equipment
  • FPD equipment

Customers

  • TSMC
  • Samsung Electronics
  • SK hynix
  • Micron
  • Logic/memory fabs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Wafer-fab equipment
  • Single-wafer cleaning

What could go right

  • Semiconductor capex upcycle

What could go wrong

  • Cyclicality
  • Legacy print business drag

Moat: narrow (installed base, process know-how, customer qualification). Leading share in single-wafer cleaning, a qualified, hard-to-swap fab process step.

Headquarters: Kyoto, Japan · Employees: 6,884

Named competitors

Screen at a glance

Size Screen (7735.T) is a Japan Information Technology company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $9.20B, the 150th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥7,778 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 24.0%, against -30.2% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 15 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.8%); the operating margin is 20.4% (peer median 16.3%).

Valuation It trades at 12.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.7× (3rd cheapest of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 10.7 points above its cost of capital (16.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20267735.T 75Peer median 67
Six months, rebased to 100: Screen against the median of its 14 peers (local-currency closes).

Screen financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥640B¥606B¥625B¥505B¥461B
Revenue growth—-3%+24%+10%—
Gross profit¥246B¥233B¥235B¥183B¥155B
EBITDA¥146B¥137B¥149B¥105B¥85.3B
Net income¥97.8B¥92.0B¥99.5B¥70.6B¥57.5B
Free cash flow¥31.7B¥67.2B¥49.4B¥58.1B¥55.1B
Capital expenditure¥33.4B¥30.9B¥25.6B¥40.3B¥20.8B
Total debt¥8.40B¥6.09B¥4.56B¥7.18B¥28.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Screen competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-50%-25%0%+25%042700MKSI6645BMIENTGGPGI3436JBLKLICCXTACMR61460390307735.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Screen is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-100%-50%0%+50%20×40×042700MKSI6645BMIENTGGPGIJBLKLICCXTACMRACLS61460390307735.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Screen is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%042700MKSI6645BMIENTGJBLKLICCXTACLS61460390307735.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Screen is the large dot.

Screen competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (7735.T vs LRCX vs 8035.T vs AMAT)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Screen 7735.T$9.20B-24%+3%20%12.4×17.3%
Lam Research LRCX$250B-32%+33%37%19.6×26.4%
Tokyo Electron 8035.T$122B+41%+18%28%23.1×28.8%
Applied Materials AMAT$264B-24%+8%31%18.8×25.5%
ACM Research ACMR$3.11B-25%+27%13%16.0×n/a

How Screen compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Screen against its 14 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7735.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-52.1%-27.3%2nd lowest of 15
6-month return-24.0%-30.2%6th highest of 15
Distance from 52-week high-60.7%-50.8%4th lowest of 15
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.9%+12.8%6th lowest of 15
Operating margin20.4%16.3%4th highest of 14
Forward P/E12.4×16.7×3rd cheapest of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)17.3%24.0%5th least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+13.6%+11.0%4th highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.7 pp+14.7 pp2nd least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+10.7 pp-1.5 pp5th highest of 15
EV / EBITDA8.6×17.2×2nd cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA-1.3×-0.3×6th least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Screen 7735.TJapan$9.20B-24%+3%20%12.4×17.3%+13.6%
HANMISemi 042700.KSSouth Korea$11.3B-56%-20%42%54.4×41.7%+17.5%
MKS MKSIUnited States$13.0B-39%+16%17%11.5×24.0%+11.0%
Omron 6645.TJapan$5.79B-17%-2%9%16.7×11.7%+3.2%
Badger Meter BMIUnited States$4.52B+33%-2%19%32.5×10.9%+16.6%
Entegris ENTGUnited States$19.6B-14%+9%19%23.7×26.3%+11.4%
GPGI GPGIUnited States$4.12B+2%-100%n/a14.2×n/an/a
Sumco 3436.TJapan$3.96B-28%+4%-4%n/an/an/a
Jabil JBLUnited States$24.6B-33%+21%5%13.5×8.3%+4.2%
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, I KLICUnited States$3.35B-38%+44%13%10.9×24.4%+1.0%
Crane NXT CXTUnited States$3.31B+27%+17%16%12.6×7.8%-9.7%
ACM Research ACMRUnited States$3.11B-25%+27%13%16.0×n/an/a
Axcelis Technologies ACLSUnited States$3.06B-39%-3%10%17.8×31.2%+12.1%
Disco 6146.TJapan$28.1B-45%+22%44%23.2×25.4%+19.0%
EO Technics 039030.KSSouth Korea$2.53B-39%+26%25%29.9×18.0%+3.2%

Questions

Who are Screen's main competitors?
Named competitors: Lam Research (LRCX), Tokyo Electron (8035.T), Applied Materials (AMAT), ACM Research (ACMR). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes HANMISemi (042700.KS), MKS (MKSI), Omron (6645.T), Badger Meter (BMI), Entegris (ENTG), GPGI (GPGI).
Is Screen expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.4× against a peer median of 16.7×, 3rd cheapest of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Screen stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -24.0% against -30.2% for the median peer; over one year +18.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.