Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6146.T Disco CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Disco Corporation6146.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Information Technology›Industrial Machinery

Maker of precision cutting, grinding and polishing tools that separate silicon wafers into individual chips.

≈ A niche, wafer-dicing-specific Applied MaterialsMomentum laggard 2
Mkt cap
$28.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
82%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$719M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+38.7 pp
WACC 14.9%
Hurdle
+6 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
83 days
28 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥40,860
1D-1.4%
1W-21.9%
1M-37.6%
3M-32.5%
6M-44.8%
YTD-14.7%
1Y-22.3%
ATR %8.2%
52w lowhigh55.4% off high

What Disco does

Maker of precision cutting, grinding and polishing tools that separate silicon wafers into individual chips.

Sells machines that cut and grind wafers, then earns again from the blades and grinding wheels those machines wear out, so each installed tool ties in later consumable purchases. Orders follow chipmakers' equipment spending, with Asia the largest region.

In one line: A niche, wafer-dicing-specific Applied Materials.

Products and services

  • Dicing saws
  • Grinders
  • Polishers
  • Consumables (blades/wheels)

Customers

  • TSMC
  • Samsung Electronics
  • memory & logic chipmakers
  • OSAT firms

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Back-end/packaging equipment
  • Dicing, grinding, polishing

What could go right

  • Advanced packaging (chiplets, HBM) needing finer dicing
  • Recurring consumables revenue

What could go wrong

  • Semiconductor capex cyclicality
  • Concentration in a few large fabs

Moat: narrow (installed base, process know-how, switching costs). Dominant share in precision dicing; consumable blades create recurring, sticky revenue.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1937 · Employees: 5,547

Named competitors

Disco at a glance

Size Disco (6146.T) is a Japan Information Technology company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $28.1B, the 57th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥40,860 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 44.8%, against -32.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 6 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 22.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.4%); the operating margin is 44.4% (peer median 19.2%).

Valuation It trades at 23.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.5× (3rd most expensive of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +19%, so the hurdle is +6 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 38.7 points above its cost of capital (14.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 28 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 656146.T 57
Six months, rebased to 100: Disco against the median of its 5 peers (local-currency closes).

Disco financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥499B¥437B¥393B¥308B¥284B
Revenue growth—+11%+28%+8%—
Gross profit¥355B¥306B¥277B¥209B¥184B
EBITDA¥237B¥199B¥179B¥132B¥121B
Net income¥160B¥136B¥124B¥84.2B¥82.9B
Free cash flown/a¥97.8B¥52.4B¥81.3B¥67.6B
Capital expendituren/a¥35.8B¥68.0B¥16.3B¥14.3B
Total debt¥0¥0¥0¥0¥0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Disco competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-40%-30%-20%-50%-40%-30%-20%JBLENTGMKSI04270077356146.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Disco is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%-10%0%+10%+20%20×40×JBLENTGMKSI04270077356146.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Disco is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

+10%+20%+30%+40%20%40%JBLENTGMKSI04270077356146.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Disco is the large dot.

Disco competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6146.T vs 7729.T vs AMAT vs 0522.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Disco 6146.T$28.1B-45%+22%44%23.2×25.4%
Tokyo Seimitsu 7729.T$3.16B-29%+17%22%15.2×16.0%
Applied Materials AMAT$264B-24%+8%31%18.8×25.5%
Asmpt 0522.HK$5.02B-47%+21%9%20.4×12.1%

How Disco compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Disco against its 5 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6146.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-37.6%-26.2%3rd lowest of 6
6-month return-44.8%-32.7%2nd lowest of 6
Distance from 52-week high-55.4%-57.0%3rd highest of 6
Revenue growth (TTM)+22.2%+9.4%highest of 6
Operating margin44.4%19.2%highest of 6
Forward P/E23.2×13.5×3rd most expensive of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)25.4%24.0%3rd most demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+19.0%+11.4%highest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+6.4 pp+13.0 pp3rd least demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+38.7 pp+10.7 pphighest of 6
EV / EBITDA17.2×15.3×3rd most expensive of 6
Net debt / EBITDA-1.4×1.0×least indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Disco 6146.TJapan$28.1B-45%+22%44%23.2×25.4%+19.0%
Jabil JBLUnited States$24.6B-33%+21%5%13.5×8.3%+4.2%
Entegris ENTGUnited States$19.6B-14%+9%19%23.7×26.3%+11.4%
MKS MKSIUnited States$13.0B-39%+16%17%11.5×24.0%+11.0%
HANMISemi 042700.KSSouth Korea$11.3B-56%-20%42%54.4×41.7%+17.5%
Screen 7735.TJapan$9.20B-24%+3%20%12.4×17.3%+13.6%

Questions

Who are Disco's main competitors?
Named competitors: Tokyo Seimitsu (7729.T), Applied Materials (AMAT), ASMPT (0522.HK), Advanced Dicing Technologies (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Jabil (JBL), Entegris (ENTG), MKS (MKSI), HANMISemi (042700.KS), Screen (7735.T).
Is Disco expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.2× against a peer median of 13.5×, 3rd most expensive of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +19%, so the hurdle is +6 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Disco stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -44.8% against -32.7% for the median peer; over one year -22.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.