Loading…

HANMISemi042700.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Information Technology›Industrial Machinery

Korean maker of semiconductor back-end packaging equipment, notably thermo-compression bonders used to stack HBM memory chips.

≈ A small, HBM-focused Korean ASMPT/Besi.Momentum weak 20
Mkt cap
$11.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
44%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$101M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
54.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+14.8 pp
WACC 11.3%
Hurdle
+24 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · KRW₩161,400
1D-4.5%
1W-11.7%
1M-39.0%
3M-20.5%
6M-56.1%
YTD+27.1%
1Y+8.2%
ATR %9.3%
52w lowhigh62.1% off high

What HANMISemi does

Korean maker of semiconductor back-end packaging equipment, notably thermo-compression bonders used to stack HBM memory chips.

Sells machines in lumps tied to chipmakers' memory-capacity budgets, so orders come in waves. Its thermo-compression bonder, a machine that heats and presses memory chips into tall stacks, is the product that ties it to the HBM boom, and SK hynix is the principal buyer.

In one line: A small, HBM-focused Korean ASMPT/Besi..

Products and services

  • TC bonders for HBM stacking
  • Wire bonders
  • Vision placement/inspection equipment

Customers

  • SK hynix
  • Samsung Electronics
  • other memory/OSAT makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Wafer-fab back-end / packaging…
  • Thermo-compression (TC) bonders for HBM…

What could go right

  • HBM capacity expansion at SK hynix/Samsung
  • AI-driven memory capex upcycle

What could go wrong

  • Customer concentration (SK hynix)
  • Memory capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, process know-how, installed base). Tool-of-record for HBM stacking at SK hynix; TC-bonder qualification is slow and sticky.

Headquarters: Incheon, South Korea · Founded: 1980 · Employees: 737

Named competitors

  • ASMPT 0522.HK
  • BE Semiconductor Industries private or unlisted
  • Kulicke & Soffa KLIC
  • Shinkawa private or unlisted

HANMISemi at a glance

Size HANMISemi (042700.KS) is a South Korea Information Technology company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $11.3B, the 38th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩161,400 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 56.1%, against -25.5% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 14 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 19.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.4%); the operating margin is 42.5% (peer median 14.8%).

Valuation It trades at 54.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.1× (most expensive of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 42% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +18%, so the hurdle is +24 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.8 points above its cost of capital (11.3% WACC).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 71042700.KS 43
Six months, rebased to 100: HANMISemi against the median of its 13 peers (local-currency closes).

HANMISemi financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩551B₩577B₩559B₩159B₩328B
Revenue growth—+3%+252%-51%—
Gross profit₩314B₩330B₩313B₩77.4B₩183B
EBITDA₩246B₩263B₩265B₩43.2B₩121B
Net income₩222B₩214B₩153B₩267B₩92.3B
Free cash flow₩122B₩154B₩87.8B₩17.5B₩100B
Capital expenditure₩76.2B₩93.7B₩53.8B₩27.6B₩9.29B
Total debt₩2.28B₩2.55B₩2.91B₩1.12B₩2.19B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

HANMISemi competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-50%-25%0%+25%MKSI7735ENTG6645JBL6146BMIGPGI3436KLICCXTACMR042700.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. HANMISemi is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-100%-50%0%+50%20×40×MKSI7735ENTG6645JBL6146BMIGPGIKLICACMRACLS042700.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. HANMISemi is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%MKSI7735ENTG6645JBL6146BMIKLICCXTACLS042700.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. HANMISemi is the large dot.

HANMISemi competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (042700.KS vs 0522.HK vs KLIC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
HANMISemi 042700.KS$11.3B-56%-20%42%54.4×41.7%
Asmpt 0522.HK$5.02B-47%+21%9%20.4×12.1%
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, I KLIC$3.35B-38%+44%13%10.9×24.4%

How HANMISemi compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

HANMISemi against its 13 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure042700.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-39.0%-26.2%3rd lowest of 14
6-month return-56.1%-25.5%lowest of 14
Distance from 52-week high-62.1%-48.8%3rd lowest of 14
Revenue growth (TTM)-19.6%+9.4%2nd lowest of 14
Operating margin42.5%14.8%2nd highest of 13
Forward P/E54.4×15.1×most expensive of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)41.7%20.6%most demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+17.5%+11.2%2nd highest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+24.2 pp+10.7 ppmost demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+14.8 pp-3.6 pp3rd highest of 14
EV / EBITDA61.9×15.6×most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA-0.3×0.1×6th least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
HANMISemi 042700.KSSouth Korea$11.3B-56%-20%42%54.4×41.7%+17.5%
MKS MKSIUnited States$13.0B-39%+16%17%11.5×24.0%+11.0%
Screen 7735.TJapan$9.20B-24%+3%20%12.4×17.3%+13.6%
Entegris ENTGUnited States$19.6B-14%+9%19%23.7×26.3%+11.4%
Omron 6645.TJapan$5.79B-17%-2%9%16.7×11.7%+3.2%
Jabil JBLUnited States$24.6B-33%+21%5%13.5×8.3%+4.2%
Disco 6146.TJapan$28.1B-45%+22%44%23.2×25.4%+19.0%
Badger Meter BMIUnited States$4.52B+33%-2%19%32.5×10.9%+16.6%
GPGI GPGIUnited States$4.12B+2%-100%n/a14.2×n/an/a
Sumco 3436.TJapan$3.96B-28%+4%-4%n/an/an/a
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, I KLICUnited States$3.35B-38%+44%13%10.9×24.4%+1.0%
Crane NXT CXTUnited States$3.31B+27%+17%16%12.6×7.8%-9.7%
ACM Research ACMRUnited States$3.11B-25%+27%13%16.0×n/an/a
Axcelis Technologies ACLSUnited States$3.06B-39%-3%10%17.8×31.2%+12.1%

Questions

Who are HANMISemi's main competitors?
Named competitors: ASMPT (0522.HK), BE Semiconductor Industries (private or unlisted), Kulicke & Soffa (KLIC), Shinkawa (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes MKS (MKSI), Screen (7735.T), Entegris (ENTG), Omron (6645.T), Jabil (JBL), Disco (6146.T).
Is HANMISemi expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 54.4× against a peer median of 15.1×, most expensive of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 42% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +18%, so the hurdle is +24 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has HANMISemi stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -56.1% against -25.5% for the median peer; over one year +8.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.