Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ACLS Axcelis Technologies, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Axcelis Technologies, Inc.ACLSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Industrial Machinery

Makes ion implantation equipment used to dope silicon wafers during semiconductor manufacturing.

Momentum laggard 12
Mkt cap
$3.06B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$42.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.4 pp
WACC 14.0%
Hurdle
+19 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
96 days
10 Feb 2027
Close · USD$99.24
1D+10.3%
1W-0.8%
1M-25.6%
3M-25.2%
6M-39.1%
YTD+23.5%
1Y+17.5%
ATR %7.4%
Beta2.49
52w lowhigh48.8% off high

What Axcelis Technologies does

Makes ion implantation equipment used to dope silicon wafers during semiconductor manufacturing.

Sells high-priced implant tools to a small group of chipmakers, so orders are lumpy and follow customers' factory building and upgrades, with spare parts, upgrades and service on installed machines providing steadier income between tool orders. It focuses on one type of tool rather than a broad equipment range.

Products and services

  • Ion implant systems
  • Aftermarket parts/service

Customers

  • Memory and foundry/logic chipmakers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Wafer-fab equipment
  • Ion implantation

What could go right

  • Power semiconductor (SiC/GaN) capex
  • Memory capex upcycle

What could go wrong

  • Customer/order concentration
  • Semiconductor capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (installed base, customer qualification, process know-how). Qualified tool-of-record status at chipmakers for implant steps is costly for customers to switch away from.

Headquarters: Beverly, Massachusetts, United States · Founded: 1978 · Employees: 1,465

Named competitors

Axcelis Technologies at a glance

Size Axcelis Technologies (ACLS) is a United States Information Technology company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $3.06B, the 1534th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $99.24 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 39.1%, against -28.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 15 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 3.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.6%); the operating margin is 10.3% (peer median 13.3%).

Valuation It trades at 17.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.6× (4th most expensive of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 31% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is +19 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.4 points below its cost of capital (14.0% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 4.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 70ACLS 60
Six months, rebased to 100: Axcelis Technologies against the median of its 14 peers (local-currency closes).

Axcelis Technologies financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$866M$839M$1.02B$1.13B$920M
Revenue growth—-18%-10%+23%—
Gross profit$373M$377M$455M$491M$402M
EBITDA$107M$137M$227M$279M$224M
Net income$92.8M$120M$201M$246M$183M
Free cash flow$65.6M$107M$129M$136M$199M
Capital expenditure$9.74M$11.3M$12.2M$20.7M$10.7M
Total debt$69.8M$71.8M$73.5M$75.9M$58.7M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Axcelis Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-50%-25%0%+25%ACMRCXTKLIC0390303436GPGIBMIUCTT6645ICHR65907735KODKACLS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Axcelis Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-100%-50%0%+50%20×40×ACMRCXTKLIC039030GPGIBMIUCTT6645ICHR042700ACLSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Axcelis Technologies is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%CXTKLIC039030BMI66457735042700KODKACLSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Axcelis Technologies is the large dot.

Axcelis Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ACLS vs AMAT vs 6302.T vs 6728.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Axcelis Technologies ACLS$3.06B-39%-3%10%17.8×31.2%
Applied Materials AMAT$264B-24%+8%31%18.8×25.5%
Sumitomo Heavy Industries 6302.T$3.64B-10%+9%6%13.0×6.3%
ULVAC 6728.T$2.01B-34%+7%7%15.5×14.1%

How Axcelis Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Axcelis Technologies against its 14 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureACLSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-25.6%-38.0%5th highest of 15
6-month return-39.1%-28.8%6th lowest of 15
Distance from 52-week high-48.8%-57.6%6th highest of 15
Revenue growth (TTM)-3.4%+6.6%3rd lowest of 15
Operating margin10.3%13.3%6th lowest of 14
Forward P/E17.8×12.6×4th most expensive of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)31.2%14.5%2nd most demanding of 9
Growth delivered (Del g)+12.1%+3.2%4th highest of 9
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+19.1 pp+11.6 pp3rd most demanding of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.4 pp-2.5 pp8th highest of 15
EV / EBITDA25.5×14.2×3rd most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA-3.1×-0.9×3rd least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Axcelis Technologies ACLSUnited States$3.06B-39%-3%10%17.8×31.2%+12.1%
ACM Research ACMRUnited States$3.11B-25%+27%13%16.0×n/an/a
Crane NXT CXTUnited States$3.31B+27%+17%16%12.6×7.8%-9.7%
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, I KLICUnited States$3.35B-38%+44%13%10.9×24.4%+1.0%
EO Technics 039030.KSSouth Korea$2.53B-39%+26%25%29.9×18.0%+3.2%
Sumco 3436.TJapan$3.96B-28%+4%-4%n/an/an/a
GPGI GPGIUnited States$4.12B+2%-100%n/a14.2×n/an/a
Badger Meter BMIUnited States$4.52B+33%-2%19%32.5×10.9%+16.6%
Ultra Clean UCTTUnited States$1.97B-53%+16%4%7.2×n/an/a
Omron 6645.TJapan$5.79B-17%-2%9%16.7×11.7%+3.2%
Ichor ICHRUnited States$1.16B-58%+15%3%9.9×n/an/a
Shibaura Mechatronics 6590.TJapan$1.03B-51%+1%16%10.3×n/an/a
Screen 7735.TJapan$9.20B-24%+3%20%12.4×17.3%+13.6%
HANMISemi 042700.KSSouth Korea$11.3B-56%-20%42%54.4×41.7%+17.5%
Eastman Kodak KODKUnited States$786M-30%+9%4%11.1×-14.7%+0.8%

Questions

Who are Axcelis Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: Applied Materials (AMAT), SEMES (Samsung) (private or unlisted), Advanced Ion Beam Technology (private or unlisted), Sumitomo Heavy Industries (6302.T), Nissin Electric (private or unlisted), Ulvac (6728.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes ACM Research (ACMR), Crane NXT (CXT), Kulicke and Soffa Industries, I (KLIC), EO Technics (039030.KS), Sumco (3436.T), GPGI (GPGI).
Is Axcelis Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.8× against a peer median of 12.6×, 4th most expensive of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 31% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is +19 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Axcelis Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -39.1% against -28.8% for the median peer; over one year +17.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.