Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 039030.KS EO TechnicsOpen in the cockpit ↗

EO Technics039030.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Information Technology›Industrial Machinery

Korean maker of laser processing equipment for semiconductor packaging, displays and PCBs, including laser markers and cutting/drilling systems.

≈ A small, laser-focused Korean equipment maker, akin to a niche Coherent systems integratorMomentum weak 34
Mkt cap
$2.53B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
69%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$28.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
29.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+10.6 pp
WACC 8.7%
Hurdle
+15 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩283,500
1D-7.8%
1W-27.0%
1M-45.3%
3M-8.2%
6M-39.4%
YTD+4.2%
1Y+20.7%
ATR %11.3%
52w lowhigh54.5% off high

What EO Technics does

Korean maker of laser processing equipment for semiconductor packaging, displays and PCBs, including laser markers and cutting/drilling systems.

Sells laser machines in orders tied to customers' capacity additions, then earns follow-on parts and service. The same laser know-how is applied to chip packaging, displays and circuit boards, so its orders follow three different capital-spending cycles.

In one line: A small, laser-focused Korean equipment maker, akin to a niche Coherent systems integrator.

Products and services

  • Semiconductor laser markers/drilling
  • Display laser processing (lift-off, cutting)
  • PCB laser drilling equipment

Customers

  • semiconductor packaging/OSAT firms
  • display panel makers
  • PCB manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Electronics manufacturing equipment
  • Laser processing systems
  • Laser markers, wafer/strip drilling…

What could go right

  • Advanced packaging (AI chip) laser-drilling demand
  • Display OLED capex

What could go wrong

  • Semiconductor/display capex cyclicality
  • Customer/order concentration

Moat: narrow (process know-how, installed base). Broad, entrenched laser-tool position across semiconductor, display and PCB processes in Korea.

Headquarters: Anyang, South Korea · Founded: 1989 · Employees: 636

Named competitors

EO Technics at a glance

Size EO Technics (039030.KS) is a South Korea Information Technology company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $2.53B, the 115th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩283,500 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 39.4%, against -28.8% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 15 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 26.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.9%); the operating margin is 24.6% (peer median 13.1%).

Valuation It trades at 29.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.6× (2nd most expensive of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 10.6 points above its cost of capital (8.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 70039030.KS 60
Six months, rebased to 100: EO Technics against the median of its 14 peers (local-currency closes).

EO Technics financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩445B₩381B₩321B₩316B₩447B
Revenue growth—+19%+1%-29%—
Gross profit₩192B₩159B₩109B₩105B₩174B
EBITDA₩115B₩86.4B₩37.1B₩38.8B₩102B
Net income₩109B₩57.2B₩42.8B₩36.6B₩76.5B
Free cash flow₩74.9B₩96.4B-₩8.84B₩26.6B₩89.0B
Capital expenditure₩28.9B₩11.4B₩64.7B₩9.96B₩3.96B
Total debt₩7.07B₩7.07B₩9.05B₩9.08B₩12.4B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

EO Technics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-50%-25%0%+25%ACLSACMRUCTTCXTKLIC3436GPGIBMIICHR66456590KODK7735039030.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. EO Technics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-100%-50%0%+50%10×20×30×ACLSACMRUCTTCXTKLICGPGIBMIICHR6645KODK089030039030.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. EO Technics is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%ACLSCXTKLICBMI6645KODK7735039030.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. EO Technics is the large dot.

EO Technics competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (039030.KS vs COHR vs 002008.SZ vs 240810.KS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
EO Technics 039030.KS$2.53B-39%+26%25%29.9×18.0%
Coherent COHR$38.0B-42%+23%14%16.6×n/a
Han's Laser Technology Industry 002008.SZ$7.97B-48%+59%12%19.1×19.6%
Wonik IPS 240810.KS$2.39B-43%+9%8%14.7×29.4%

How EO Technics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

EO Technics against its 14 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure039030.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-45.3%-33.3%6th lowest of 15
6-month return-39.4%-28.8%5th lowest of 15
Distance from 52-week high-54.5%-56.8%8th highest of 15
Revenue growth (TTM)+26.1%+3.9%3rd highest of 15
Operating margin24.6%13.1%highest of 14
Forward P/E29.9×12.6×2nd most expensive of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)18.0%11.7%3rd most demanding of 8
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.2%+3.2%4th highest of 8
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+14.7 pp+8.5 pp4th most demanding of 8
ROIC minus cost of capital+10.6 pp-5.0 pp3rd highest of 15
EV / EBITDA26.9×14.2×most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA-2.9×-0.9×4th least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
EO Technics 039030.KSSouth Korea$2.53B-39%+26%25%29.9×18.0%+3.2%
Axcelis Technologies ACLSUnited States$3.06B-39%-3%10%17.8×31.2%+12.1%
ACM Research ACMRUnited States$3.11B-25%+27%13%16.0×n/an/a
Ultra Clean UCTTUnited States$1.97B-53%+16%4%7.2×n/an/a
Crane NXT CXTUnited States$3.31B+27%+17%16%12.6×7.8%-9.7%
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, I KLICUnited States$3.35B-38%+44%13%10.9×24.4%+1.0%
Sumco 3436.TJapan$3.96B-28%+4%-4%n/an/an/a
GPGI GPGIUnited States$4.12B+2%-100%n/a14.2×n/an/a
Badger Meter BMIUnited States$4.52B+33%-2%19%32.5×10.9%+16.6%
Ichor ICHRUnited States$1.16B-58%+15%3%9.9×n/an/a
Omron 6645.TJapan$5.79B-17%-2%9%16.7×11.7%+3.2%
Shibaura Mechatronics 6590.TJapan$1.03B-51%+1%16%10.3×n/an/a
Eastman Kodak KODKUnited States$786M-30%+9%4%11.1×-14.7%+0.8%
Techwing 089030.KSSouth Korea$737M-51%+4%18%15.8×n/an/a
Screen 7735.TJapan$9.20B-24%+3%20%12.4×17.3%+13.6%

Questions

Who are EO Technics's main competitors?
Named competitors: Coherent Corp (COHR), Han's Laser Technology (002008.SZ), AP Systems (private or unlisted), Wonik IPS (240810.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Axcelis Technologies (ACLS), ACM Research (ACMR), Ultra Clean (UCTT), Crane NXT (CXT), Kulicke and Soffa Industries, I (KLIC), Sumco (3436.T).
Is EO Technics expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 29.9× against a peer median of 12.6×, 2nd most expensive of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has EO Technics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -39.4% against -28.8% for the median peer; over one year +20.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.