Loading…

JabilJBLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Industrial Machinery

Provides contract electronics manufacturing and supply-chain services, building products for technology, industrial and healthcare customers.

Momentum laggard 14
Mkt cap
$24.6B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$360M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+23.7 pp
WACC 10.7%
Hurdle
+4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB- / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
34 days
10 Dec 2026
Close · USD$239.09
1D+1.2%
1W-12.3%
1M-20.1%
3M-29.0%
6M-32.7%
YTD+4.9%
1Y+9.7%
ATR %5.9%
Beta2.06
52w lowhigh44.3% off high

What Jabil does

Provides contract electronics manufacturing and supply-chain services, building products for technology, industrial and healthcare customers.

Builds products to customers' designs and is paid for the work and parts it supplies, passing component costs through, so revenue is large relative to profit and rises with customers' orders. Mix has been widening to include cloud and data-center hardware, healthcare and industrial work.

Products and services

  • Electronics manufacturing services (EMS)
  • Design/engineering services
  • Supply-chain/logistics services

Customers

  • Technology & telecom OEMs
  • Healthcare/industrial device makers
  • Automotive/EV customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Electronics manufacturing services
  • Contract manufacturing & design…
  • Supply-chain/logistics for OEM…

What could go right

  • AI/data-center infrastructure manufacturing demand
  • Diversification into healthcare/industrial verticals

What could go wrong

  • Customer concentration/order volatility
  • Thin contract-manufacturing margins

Moat: narrow (scale, cost advantage, customer qualification). Large-scale global manufacturing footprint and qualified processes give cost/quality edge versus smaller EMS players.

Headquarters: St. Petersburg, Florida, US · Founded: 1966 · Employees: 140,000

Named competitors

Jabil at a glance

Size Jabil (JBL) is a United States Information Technology company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $24.6B, the 429th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $239.09 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 32.7%, against -38.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 6 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 20.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.4%); the operating margin is 5.1% (peer median 20.4%).

Valuation It trades at 13.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 23.2× (3rd cheapest of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 23.7 points above its cost of capital (10.7% WACC).

Credit Jabil has 7 bonds outstanding ($3.40B), rated BBB- by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 106 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026JBL 65Peer median 60
Six months, rebased to 100: Jabil against the median of its 5 peers (local-currency closes).

Jabil financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-08-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$36.0B$36.0B$29.8B$28.9B$34.7B
Revenue growth—+21%+3%-17%—
Gross profit$3.23B$3.23B$2.63B$2.69B$2.84B
EBITDA$2.52B$2.57B$2.16B$2.19B$2.53B
Net income$1.04B$1.04B$657M$1.39B$818M
Free cash flow$1.37B$1.37B$1.17B$932M$704M
Capital expenditure$628M$628M$468M$784M$1.03B
Total debt$4.34B$4.34B$3.73B$3.61B$3.32B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Jabil competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-40%-30%-20%-50%-40%-30%-20%6146ENTGMKSI0427007735JBL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Jabil is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%-10%0%+10%+20%20×40×6146ENTGMKSI0427007735JBLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Jabil is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

+10%+20%+30%+40%20%40%6146ENTGMKSI0427007735JBLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Jabil is the large dot.

Jabil competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (JBL vs FLEX vs 2317.TW vs CLS.TO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Jabil JBL$24.6B-33%+21%5%13.5×8.3%
Flex FLEX$25.8B-51%+18%6%11.2×15.9%
Hon Hai Precision Industry 2317.TW$95.6B-3%+25%4%10.5×n/a
Celestica CLS.TO$26.3B-44%+61%9%11.5×11.0%
Sanmina SANM$7.22B-46%+59%5%10.7×6.8%
Plexus PLXS$5.12B-28%+23%5%17.9×n/a
Benchmark Electronics BHE$2.16B-29%+13%4%17.7×13.8%
Fabrinet FN$11.7B-47%+43%10%15.6×n/a
Kimball Electronics KE$462M-26%-4%4%12.1×4.0%

How Jabil compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Jabil against its 5 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureJBLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.1%-37.6%highest of 6
6-month return-32.7%-38.6%3rd highest of 6
Distance from 52-week high-44.3%-57.0%2nd highest of 6
Revenue growth (TTM)+20.6%+9.4%2nd highest of 6
Operating margin5.1%20.4%lowest of 6
Forward P/E13.5×23.2×3rd cheapest of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.3%25.4%least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.2%+13.6%lowest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+4.1 pp+13.0 pp2nd least demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+23.7 pp+10.7 pp2nd highest of 6
EV / EBITDA10.8×17.2×2nd cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA1.0×-0.3×3rd most indebted of 6
Bond spread106 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Jabil JBLUnited States$24.6B-33%+21%5%13.5×8.3%+4.2%
Disco 6146.TJapan$28.1B-45%+22%44%23.2×25.4%+19.0%
Entegris ENTGUnited States$19.6B-14%+9%19%23.7×26.3%+11.4%
MKS MKSIUnited States$13.0B-39%+16%17%11.5×24.0%+11.0%
HANMISemi 042700.KSSouth Korea$11.3B-56%-20%42%54.4×41.7%+17.5%
Screen 7735.TJapan$9.20B-24%+3%20%12.4×17.3%+13.6%

Jabil bonds and credit

Jabil has 7 bonds outstanding with $3.40B face value. The agencies rate it BBB-; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 5.58%, a spread of 106 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Jabil's main competitors?
Named competitors: Flex Ltd (FLEX), Foxconn/Hon Hai (2317.TW), Celestica (CLS.TO), Sanmina (SANM), Plexus (PLXS), Benchmark Electronics (BHE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Disco (6146.T), Entegris (ENTG), MKS (MKSI), HANMISemi (042700.KS), Screen (7735.T).
Is Jabil expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.5× against a peer median of 23.2×, 3rd cheapest of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Jabil stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -32.7% against -38.6% for the median peer; over one year +9.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.