Loading…

MKS Inc.MKSICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Industrial Machinery

Makes vacuum, laser and process-control instruments used in chipmaking, plus plating equipment for electronics.

Momentum laggard 10
Mkt cap
$13.0B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$346M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.0 pp
WACC 13.1%
Hurdle
+13 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BB- / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
82 days
27 Jan 2027
Close · USD$192.27
1D+8.7%
1W-4.8%
1M-26.2%
3M-34.2%
6M-38.6%
YTD+20.4%
1Y+37.8%
ATR %7.2%
Beta2.59
52w lowhigh57.0% off high

What MKS does

Makes vacuum, laser and process-control instruments used in chipmaking, plus plating equipment for electronics.

Sells components and subsystems built into chipmakers' tools, so orders follow the tool makers' build plans, while Atotech's plating chemicals are used up in customers' plants and reordered. It bought Newport, the photonics maker, in 2016 and Atotech in 2022, each widening it beyond chip-equipment parts.

Products and services

  • Vacuum solutions
  • Photonics & laser systems
  • Atotech plating chemistry/equipment
  • Process control instruments

Customers

  • semiconductor equipment makers
  • chipmakers
  • industrial/electronics manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductor & industrial instruments
  • Vacuum/photonics/process control
  • Sub-systems used inside larger fab…

What could go right

  • Semiconductor capex recovery
  • Advanced packaging plating demand

What could go wrong

  • Semiconductor capex cyclicality
  • Integration risk from acquisitions (Atotech)

Moat: narrow (process know-how, switching costs, customer qualification). Components are embedded inside customers' larger tools and process flows, making substitution costly.

Headquarters: Andover, Massachusetts, US · Founded: 1961 · Employees: 10,300

Named competitors

MKS at a glance

Size MKS (MKSI) is a United States Information Technology company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $13.0B, the 663rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $192.27 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 38.6%, against -24.0% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 12 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.9%); the operating margin is 16.7% (peer median 17.5%).

Valuation It trades at 11.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.5× (2nd cheapest of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 24% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is +13 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.0 points below its cost of capital (13.1% WACC).

Credit MKS has 2 bonds outstanding ($2.51B), rated BB- by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 216 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 7.3% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 27 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 75MKSI 60
Six months, rebased to 100: MKS against the median of its 11 peers (local-currency closes).

MKS financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$4.35B$3.93B$3.59B$3.62B$3.55B
Revenue growth—+10%-1%+2%—
Gross profit$1.79B$1.59B$1.46B$1.34B$1.38B
EBITDA$1.07B$907M$860M$774M$870M
Net income$441M$295M$190M-$1.84B$333M
Free cash flow$433M$497M$377M$223M$365M
Capital expenditure$180M$148M$118M$87.0M$164M
Total debt$4.19B$4.45B$4.78B$5.02B$5.17B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

MKS competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-50%-25%0%+25%0427007735ENTGJBL61466645BMIGPGI3436KLICCXTMKSI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. MKS is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-100%-50%0%+50%20×40×0427007735ENTGJBL61466645BMIGPGIKLICCXTMKSIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. MKS is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%0427007735ENTGJBL61466645BMIKLICCXTMKSIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. MKS is the large dot.

MKS competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MKSI vs AEIS vs AZTA vs AMAT)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
MKS MKSI$13.0B-39%+16%17%11.5×24.0%
Advanced Energy Industries AEIS$7.98B-45%+32%17%11.7×17.8%
Azenta AZTA$1.72B+104%+1%-3%103.7×56.0%
Applied Materials AMAT$264B-24%+8%31%18.8×25.5%

How MKS compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

MKS against its 11 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMKSIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-26.2%-28.4%6th highest of 12
6-month return-38.6%-24.0%3rd lowest of 12
Distance from 52-week high-57.0%-46.4%4th lowest of 12
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.2%+3.9%5th highest of 12
Operating margin16.7%17.5%6th highest of 11
Forward P/E11.5×15.5×2nd cheapest of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)24.0%17.3%5th most demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.0%+11.4%5th lowest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+13.0 pp+8.5 pp5th most demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.0 pp+9.6 pp4th lowest of 12
EV / EBITDA15.3×14.0×6th cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA3.3×0.1×most indebted of 11
Bond spread216 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
MKS MKSIUnited States$13.0B-39%+16%17%11.5×24.0%+11.0%
HANMISemi 042700.KSSouth Korea$11.3B-56%-20%42%54.4×41.7%+17.5%
Screen 7735.TJapan$9.20B-24%+3%20%12.4×17.3%+13.6%
Entegris ENTGUnited States$19.6B-14%+9%19%23.7×26.3%+11.4%
Jabil JBLUnited States$24.6B-33%+21%5%13.5×8.3%+4.2%
Disco 6146.TJapan$28.1B-45%+22%44%23.2×25.4%+19.0%
Omron 6645.TJapan$5.79B-17%-2%9%16.7×11.7%+3.2%
Badger Meter BMIUnited States$4.52B+33%-2%19%32.5×10.9%+16.6%
GPGI GPGIUnited States$4.12B+2%-100%n/a14.2×n/an/a
Sumco 3436.TJapan$3.96B-28%+4%-4%n/an/an/a
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, I KLICUnited States$3.35B-38%+44%13%10.9×24.4%+1.0%
Crane NXT CXTUnited States$3.31B+27%+17%16%12.6×7.8%-9.7%

MKS bonds and credit

MKS has 2 bonds outstanding with $2.51B face value. The agencies rate it BB-; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 5.28%, a spread of 216 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are MKS's main competitors?
Named competitors: Advanced Energy Industries (AEIS), Azenta (AZTA), Applied Materials (AMAT). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes HANMISemi (042700.KS), Screen (7735.T), Entegris (ENTG), Jabil (JBL), Disco (6146.T), Omron (6645.T).
Is MKS expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.5× against a peer median of 15.5×, 2nd cheapest of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 24% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is +13 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has MKS stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -38.6% against -24.0% for the median peer; over one year +37.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.