Loading…

Sharp Corp6753.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Information Technology›Electronics/Appliances

Japanese consumer-electronics maker (TVs, appliances, displays), majority owned by Taiwan's Foxconn since 2016.

≈ A distressed, smaller Japanese Whirlpool/Vizio combined, now Foxconn-controlledMomentum weak 23
Mkt cap
$2.18B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
36%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.3 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
+6 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥529
1D-5.4%
1W-4.0%
1M-16.9%
3M-15.1%
6M-5.5%
YTD-31.4%
1Y-38.8%
ATR %4.2%
52w lowhigh41.5% off high

What Sharp does

Japanese consumer-electronics maker (TVs, appliances, displays), majority owned by Taiwan's Foxconn since 2016.

Sells appliances, TVs and office equipment under the Sharp brand in Japan and Asia, and also makes displays for other manufacturers' products. Foxconn, Taiwan's contract electronics giant, has controlled it since 2016, and Sharp has since cut back large-panel manufacturing.

In one line: A distressed, smaller Japanese Whirlpool/Vizio combined, now Foxconn-controlled.

Products and services

  • TVs/displays
  • Home appliances
  • LCD panel manufacturing
  • Solar panels

Customers

  • Household consumers
  • Electronics/appliance retailers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer electronics
  • Appliances & displays
  • TVs, appliances, LCD panels

What could go right

  • Foxconn synergies/restructuring

What could go wrong

  • Chronic losses/restructuring risk
  • Intense global TV/appliance competition

Moat: none (brand). Legacy brand recognition but weak profitability and reliance on Foxconn parent support.

Headquarters: Sakai, Japan · Founded: 1912 · Employees: 34,549

Named competitors

Sharp at a glance

Size Sharp (6753.T) is a Japan Information Technology company (Electronics/Appliances) with a market value of $2.18B, the 457th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥529 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 5.5%, against -3.4% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 11.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +16.8%); the operating margin is 2.2% (peer median 11.5%).

Valuation It trades at 12.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.1× (6th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -5%, so the hurdle is +6 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.3 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 986753.T 91
Six months, rebased to 100: Sharp against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Sharp financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥1.86T¥1.89T¥2.16T¥2.32T¥2.55T
Revenue growth—-12%-7%-9%—
Gross profit¥417B¥465B¥457B¥401B¥393B
EBITDA¥77.8B¥86.9B¥77.4B¥40.8B¥60.6B
Net income¥23.3B¥47.4B¥36.1B-¥150B-¥261B
Free cash flow¥761M-¥22.0B-¥28.4B¥83.6B-¥28.8B
Capital expenditure¥33.9B¥33.5B¥39.0B¥52.6B¥57.0B
Total debt¥469B¥472B¥547B¥598B¥736B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sharp competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-40%-20%0%+20%6770687168906787521467284686392394498056399467544980310744783697444343737762429A6753.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sharp is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×1,000×2,000×67706871689067875214392339946754310744786753.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sharp is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%6770521467284686392380566754498036974443437377626753.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Sharp is the large dot.

Sharp competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6753.T vs 6752.T vs 6758.T vs 005930.KS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Sharp 6753.T$2.18B-5%-12%2%12.0×1.2%
Panasonic 6752.T$44.5B-6%+4%8%13.5×9.8%
Sony 6758.T$156B+33%+1%13%18.7×3.4%
SamsungElec 005930.KS$886B-14%+88%46%4.0×-7.2%

How Sharp compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sharp against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6753.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.9%-13.1%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-5.5%-3.4%9th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-41.5%-31.7%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-11.7%+16.8%lowest of 21
Operating margin2.2%11.5%2nd lowest of 21
Forward P/E12.0×14.1×6th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)1.2%8.3%6th least demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)-4.8%+8.4%lowest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+6.1 pp-5.4 pp3rd most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.3 pp+2.2 pp8th lowest of 17
Net debt / EBITDA2.8×-0.5×2nd most indebted of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Sharp 6753.TJapan$2.18B-5%-12%2%12.0×1.2%-4.8%
Alps Alpine 6770.TJapan$2.23B-24%+5%3%10.8×-3.8%+7.3%
Micronics Japan 6871.TJapan$2.11B-33%+38%28%14.1×n/an/a
Ferrotec 6890.TJapan$2.08B-19%+43%12%8.3×n/an/a
Meiko Electronics 6787.TJapan$2.07B-27%+22%10%10.7×n/an/a
Nippon Electric Glass 5214.TJapan$2.32B-44%+3%8%22.6×2.4%+5.1%
ULVAC 6728.TJapan$2.01B-34%+7%7%15.5×14.1%+8.0%
Justsystems 4686.TJapan$2.01B+33%+10%44%n/a-6.3%+4.6%
RAKUS 3923.TJapan$2.38B+24%+17%31%14.1×15.8%+31.4%
GMO Internet 9449.TJapan$1.94B-4%+6%21%13.4×n/an/a
BIPROGY 8056.TJapan$2.47B-3%+4%10%13.1×-9.5%+7.1%
Money Forward 3994.TJapan$2.52B+51%+35%2%2,235.1×n/an/a
Anritsu 6754.TJapan$1.87B-45%+21%15%16.3×11.3%+2.1%
Dexerials 4980.TJapan$2.55B-4%+5%35%13.8×15.0%+11.6%
Daiwabo 3107.TJapan$1.79B+4%+14%3%10.8×-7.7%+5.3%
freee K.K 4478.TJapan$1.72B+100%+28%3%79.1×n/an/a
Shift 3697.TJapan$1.71B+61%+24%11%19.2×-2.2%+28.6%
Sansan 4443.TJapan$1.67B+65%+22%18%27.4×20.3%+27.1%
Simplex Holdings,Inc 4373.TJapan$1.66B+25%+20%23%19.4×12.4%+16.3%
Citizen Watch 7762.TJapan$2.90B+3%+17%10%12.8×10.1%+10.9%
Tekscend Photomask 429A.TJapan$1.64B-36%+10%22%9.9×6.4%+8.7%

Questions

Who are Sharp's main competitors?
Named competitors: Panasonic (6752.T), Sony (6758.T), Samsung Electronics (005930.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (sector in the same market, nearest in size) also includes Alps Alpine (6770.T), Micronics Japan (6871.T), Ferrotec (6890.T), Meiko Electronics (6787.T), Nippon Electric Glass (5214.T), ULVAC (6728.T).
Is Sharp expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.0× against a peer median of 14.1×, 6th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -5%, so the hurdle is +6 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Sharp stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -5.5% against -3.4% for the median peer; over one year -38.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.