Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3107.T Daiwabo Holdings Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Daiwabo Holdings Co., Ltd.3107.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Information Technology›Electronics Distributors

Diversified holding company spanning IT/electronics distribution, nonwoven fabrics and textile materials, originally a spinning company.

≈ A diversified Japanese trading/materials holding companyMomentum neutral 47
Mkt cap
$1.79B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
82%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.19M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
10.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.6 pp
WACC 5.9%
Hurdle
-13 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥3,343
1D-6.0%
1W-12.8%
1M-8.1%
3M-5.4%
6M+4.2%
YTD+8.5%
1Y+15.9%
ATR %3.4%
52w lowhigh14.0% off high

What Daiwabo does

Diversified holding company spanning IT/electronics distribution, nonwoven fabrics and textile materials, originally a spinning company.

In one line: A diversified Japanese trading/materials holding company.

Products and services

  • IT/electronics product distribution
  • Nonwoven fabrics
  • Textile materials

Customers

  • Retailers/resellers (IT distribution)
  • Hygiene/industrial product makers (nonwovens)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Diversified holding company
  • IT distribution & materials
  • Electronics distribution, nonwovens…

What could go right

  • IT hardware refresh cycles

What could go wrong

  • Distribution margin pressure
  • Textile segment secular decline

Moat: none (distribution). Holding company of scale-driven distribution and commodity materials businesses with limited pricing power.

Headquarters: Osaka, Japan · Founded: 1918 · Employees: 3,072

Named competitors

Daiwabo at a glance

Size Daiwabo (3107.T) is a Japan Information Technology company (Electronics Distributors) with a market value of $1.79B, the 517th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,343 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 4.2%, against -13.1% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 14.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +27.4%); the operating margin is 3.1% (peer median 4.1%).

Valuation It trades at 10.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.2× (cheapest of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.6 points above its cost of capital (5.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20263107.T 104Peer median 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Daiwabo against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Daiwabo financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥1.37T¥1.35T¥1.14T¥968B¥904B
Revenue growth—+19%+17%+7%—
Gross profit¥93.2B¥94.6B¥79.8B¥78.2B¥70.5B
EBITDA¥44.2B¥46.2B¥36.8B¥34.4B¥31.3B
Net income¥30.6B¥32.0B¥24.8B¥4.28B¥19.1B
Free cash flown/a¥11.7B¥3.98B¥22.5B¥15.3B
Capital expendituren/a¥6.09B¥3.40B¥2.73B¥2.02B
Total debt¥36.8B¥19.1B¥21.5B¥21.9B¥27.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Daiwabo competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%3023300131300184SES301589ASB002416300353000829001287YUBICOSWON3009758056600751REZIALSN0000623010993107.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Daiwabo is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×50×100×150×3023300184SES301589ASB002416300353000829YUBICOSWONALSN3010993107.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Daiwabo is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%3023SES301589ASBYUBICOSWON8056ALSN3107.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Daiwabo is the large dot.

Daiwabo competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (3107.T vs 3132.T vs 2760.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Daiwabo 3107.T$1.79B+4%+14%3%10.8×-7.7%
Macnica 3132.T$3.23B+8%+35%4%11.8×n/a
Tokyo Electron Device 2760.T$676M0%+16%6%8.7×5.9%

How Daiwabo compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Daiwabo against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3107.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.1%-7.5%9th lowest of 21
6-month return+4.2%-13.1%6th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-14.0%-34.7%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+14.5%+27.4%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin3.1%4.1%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E10.8×16.2×cheapest of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-7.7%-2.2%2nd least demanding of 9
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.3%+8.9%2nd lowest of 9
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-13.0 pp-10.1 pp4th least demanding of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.6 pp+2.7 pp6th highest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA0.7×0.8×4th least indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Daiwabo 3107.TJapan$1.79B+4%+14%3%10.8×-7.7%+5.3%
SINBON Electronics 3023.TWTaiwan$1.88B-11%+9%10%15.4×-0.1%+7.3%
Shenzhen Yitoa Intelligent Control 300131.SZChina$1.68B-39%+3%0%n/an/an/a
Wuhan P&S Information Technology 300184.SZChina$1.63B-29%+48%5%15.8×n/an/a
SeSa SES.MIItaly$1.53B-1%+11%4%11.4×-7.1%+12.0%
Xi'an Novastar Tech 301589.SZChina$2.12B-9%+15%17%22.0×15.9%+28.7%
ASBISc Enterprises ASB.WAPoland$2.17B+123%+43%4%12.6×5.9%+9.5%
Shenzhen Aisidi 002416.SZChina$1.44B-44%+26%1%22.1×n/an/a
Kyland Technology 300353.SZChina$1.42B-17%-6%-6%80.9×n/an/a
Telling Telecommunication 000829.SZChina$1.41B-21%+37%0%153.2×n/an/a
Shenzhen CECport Technologies 001287.SZChina$2.28B-24%+138%2%n/an/an/a
Yubico YUBICO.STSweden$1.40B+189%-9%9%59.8×26.3%+12.4%
SoftwareOne SWON.SWSwitzerland$2.30B+11%+62%12%12.6×-5.7%+8.4%
Nanjing Sunlord Electronics 300975.SZChina$2.40B-11%+109%8%n/an/an/a
BIPROGY 8056.TJapan$2.47B-3%+4%10%13.1×-9.5%+7.1%
Qi An Xin Technology 688561.SSChina$2.61B-15%-14%-45%n/an/an/a
HNA Technology 600751.SSChina$1.11B-26%+33%0%n/an/an/a
Resideo Technologies REZIUnited States$2.95B+6%+3%8%13.8×n/an/a
ALSO ALSN.SWSwitzerland$3.01B+17%+29%2%16.7×-4.4%-0.1%
Shenzhen Huaqiang Industry 000062.SZChina$3.04B-48%+48%4%n/an/an/a
Shanghai YCT Electronics 301099.SZChina$1.02B-17%+106%6%22.6×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Daiwabo's main competitors?
Named competitors: Ryosan (private or unlisted), Macnica Holdings (3132.T), Tokyo Electron Device (2760.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes SINBON Electronics (3023.TW), Shenzhen Yitoa Intelligent Control (300131.SZ), Wuhan P&S Information Technology (300184.SZ), SeSa (SES.MI), Xi'an Novastar Tech (301589.SZ), ASBISc Enterprises (ASB.WA).
Is Daiwabo expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 10.8× against a peer median of 16.2×, cheapest of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Daiwabo stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +4.2% against -13.1% for the median peer; over one year +15.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.