Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9449.T GMO Internet Group, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

GMO Internet Group, Inc.9449.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Information Technology›Information Technology Services

Japanese internet conglomerate spanning domain registration, web hosting, online payments, FX trading and crypto.

≈ A Japanese mashup of GoDaddy, PayPal and Interactive Brokers' FX unitMomentum laggard 12
Mkt cap
$1.94B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
45%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$28.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
7 days
13 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥2,964
1D-8.5%
1W-12.2%
1M-25.1%
3M-28.6%
6M-3.8%
YTD-24.4%
1Y-15.9%
ATR %6.1%
52w lowhigh32.5% off high

What GMO Internet does

Japanese internet conglomerate spanning domain registration, web hosting, online payments, FX trading and crypto.

Earns small recurring fees from many customers on domain names, hosting and security certificates, and takes a cut of payments passing through its payment unit, while online brokerage and FX trading revenue swings with market activity. Founder and chief executive Masatoshi Kumagai is the controlling shareholder.

In one line: A Japanese mashup of GoDaddy, PayPal and Interactive Brokers' FX unit.

Products and services

  • Domain registration/hosting
  • Internet finance (FX, payments)
  • Cryptocurrency exchange
  • Advertising/media

Customers

  • SMBs needing web/hosting services
  • Retail FX/crypto traders
  • Online merchants (payments)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Internet services
  • Internet infrastructure and fintech
  • Domains/hosting, payments, FX, crypto…

What could go right

  • Cashless payments growth in Japan
  • Crypto/FX trading volumes

What could go wrong

  • Regulatory changes in fintech/crypto
  • Competitive hosting market

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base, network effects). Largest Japanese domain/hosting base cross-sells into payments and FX, but each unit faces its own competitors.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1991 · Employees: 6,484

Named competitors

GMO Internet at a glance

Size GMO Internet (9449.T) is a Japan Information Technology company (Information Technology Services) with a market value of $1.94B, the 495th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,964 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 3.8%, against -11.0% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.4%); the operating margin is 20.9% (peer median 7.8%).

Valuation It trades at 13.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.8× (4th cheapest of 17).

Next results Next results expected around 13 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20269449.T 97Peer median 87
Six months, rebased to 100: GMO Internet against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

GMO Internet financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥302B¥285B¥276B¥259B¥246B
Revenue growth—+3%+7%+5%—
Gross profit¥177B¥161B¥156B¥145B¥141B
EBITDA¥81.8B¥79.6B¥66.1B¥55.7B¥57.4B
Net income¥17.1B¥16.7B¥14.8B¥14.2B¥13.2B
Free cash flown/a¥48.4B¥75.7B-¥812M¥21.3B
Capital expendituren/a¥12.0B¥15.8B¥22.4B¥10.4B
Total debt¥597B¥678B¥636B¥479B¥396B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

GMO Internet competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%+20%KNOSATEACNXNCAMSCNXCGLOBSIGMAADV600410ATEN002268002410FORTY3004693697OMCL022100300170002987TIETO43739449.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. GMO Internet is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%-10%0%+10%+20%0×20×40×60×KNOSATEACNXNCAMSCNXCGLOBATEN0022680024103697OMCL022100300170002987TIETO43739449.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. GMO Internet is the large dot.

GMO Internet competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9449.T vs 4755.T vs 8473.T vs 3769.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
GMO Internet 9449.T$1.94B-4%+6%21%13.4×n/a
Rakuten 4755.T$8.59B-18%+11%6%n/a-2.0%
SBI 8473.T$11.2B-13%+20%40%5.9×n/a
GMO Payment Gateway 3769.T$3.98B+6%+13%40%24.9×n/a

How GMO Internet compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

GMO Internet against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9449.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-25.1%-0.8%lowest of 21
6-month return-3.8%-11.0%9th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-32.5%-33.3%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.4%+6.4%11th highest of 21
Operating margin20.9%7.8%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E13.4×20.8×4th cheapest of 17
Net debt / EBITDA-11.4×0.4×least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
GMO Internet 9449.TJapan$1.94B-4%+6%21%13.4×n/an/a
Kainos KNOS.LUnited Kingdom$1.92B+57%+17%11%23.2×21.7%+12.9%
Atea ATEA.OLNorway$1.99B+6%+12%4%16.4×-5.0%-1.1%
PC Connection CNXNUnited States$2.00B+19%+10%4%16.6×n/an/a
Computer Age Management Services CAMS.NSIndia$1.87B-15%+9%39%32.3×n/an/a
Concentrix CNXCUnited States$1.85B+25%+3%8%2.6×-11.9%+15.8%
Globant GLOBUnited States$2.05B+21%-1%10%8.0×-1.2%+24.7%
Sigma Advanced Systems SIGMAADV.NSIndia$1.83B+196%+358%12%n/an/an/a
Beijing Teamsun Technology 600410.SSChina$2.09B-42%+19%-9%n/a26.0%+3.6%
A10 Networks ATENUnited States$1.80B-11%+12%17%22.0×16.7%+5.2%
CETC Cyberspace Security Technology 002268.SZChina$1.77B-11%-3%1%45.0×n/an/a
Glodon 002410.SZChina$2.15B-21%-4%8%31.6×5.4%+8.8%
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. Sponsored ADR FORTYUnited States$1.75B-26%+1%8%n/a-3.4%+6.3%
Transportation Telecommunication and Information Development Inc. Ltd. Zhejiang 300469.SZChina$1.72B-18%-15%-102%n/an/an/a
Shift 3697.TJapan$1.71B+61%+24%11%19.2×-2.2%+28.6%
Omnicell OMCLUnited States$1.70B-15%+6%5%19.5×11.7%+5.8%
Posco Dx 022100.KSSouth Korea$2.24B-43%-15%3%69.6×34.8%+2.2%
Hand Enterprise Solutions 300170.SZChina$2.24B-26%+7%6%48.8×27.4%+6.5%
Northking Information Technology 002987.SZChina$1.67B-14%+1%6%30.6×16.2%+16.1%
Tieto TIETO.HEFinland$2.26B-5%-17%20%10.4×-6.4%-7.8%
Simplex Holdings,Inc 4373.TJapan$1.66B+25%+20%23%19.4×12.4%+16.3%

Questions

Who are GMO Internet's main competitors?
Named competitors: Rakuten (4755.T), SBI Holdings (8473.T), GMO Payment Gateway (3769.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Kainos (KNOS.L), Atea (ATEA.OL), PC Connection (CNXN), Computer Age Management Services (CAMS.NS), Concentrix (CNXC), Globant (GLOB).
Is GMO Internet expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.4× against a peer median of 20.8×, 4th cheapest of 17 in its peer set.
How has GMO Internet stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -3.8% against -11.0% for the median peer; over one year -15.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.