Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 603888.SS XinhuaNet Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

XinhuaNet Co., Ltd. Class A603888.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Internet Software/Services

Digital arm of the Xinhua News Agency, running a state-owned online news portal and related media technology services.

≈ A state-owned Chinese analogue to a wire-service digital portalMomentum strong 79
Mkt cap
$1.89B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
38%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$41.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+5.0 pp
WACC 8.9%
Hurdle
+13 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · CNYCN¥16.94
1D-1.9%
1W+8.9%
1M+0.1%
3M+0.1%
6M-7.2%
YTD-4.1%
1Y-4.2%
ATR %4.3%
52w lowhigh40.8% off high

What XinhuaNet does

Digital arm of the Xinhua News Agency, running a state-owned online news portal and related media technology services.

Readers do not pay, so the money comes from advertising and from services sold to government bodies and companies, such as online campaigns, events and media-technology projects.

In one line: A state-owned Chinese analogue to a wire-service digital portal.

Products and services

  • Online news portal
  • Digital advertising
  • Media technology services

Customers

  • Online readers
  • Advertisers
  • Government agencies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Internet media
  • State-media online news portal

What could go right

  • Digital advertising/media services

What could go wrong

  • Online-news monetization pressure

Moat: narrow (brand, regulatory licence). Backed by Xinhua brand and licensed as an official state news outlet.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Employees: 1,655

Named competitors

XinhuaNet at a glance

Size XinhuaNet (603888.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Internet Software/Services) with a market value of $1.89B, the 1327th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥16.94 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 7.2%, against +0.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 0.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.2%); the operating margin is 7.7% (peer median 11.0%).

Valuation It trades at 4.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.8× (9th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is +13 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.0 points above its cost of capital (8.9% WACC).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 103603888.SS 90
Six months, rebased to 100: XinhuaNet against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

XinhuaNet financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥2.22BCN¥2.22BCN¥2.13BCN¥2.07BCN¥1.94B
Revenue growth—+4%+3%+7%—
Gross profitCN¥927MCN¥801MCN¥775MCN¥679MCN¥562M
EBITDAn/aCN¥293MCN¥315MCN¥253MCN¥279M
Net incomeCN¥332MCN¥329MCN¥234MCN¥274MCN¥242M
Free cash flowCN¥486MCN¥518M-CN¥545MCN¥463MCN¥521M
Capital expenditureCN¥57.7MCN¥58.3MCN¥1.02BCN¥30.9MCN¥47.3M
Total debtCN¥13.9MCN¥11.4MCN¥40.0MCN¥54.3MCN¥111M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

XinhuaNet competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-10%0%+10%+20%TBOTEKZD9898300253601519DAOMONYCARTRADETRST181710ABSLAMC603000WBTN000793BCGMOONPPLICRISILEVER603888.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. XinhuaNet is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%0×10×20×TBOTEKZD9898300253601519DAOCARTRADETRST181710603000000793BCGPPLIEVER603888.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. XinhuaNet is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-25%0%25%ZD300253DAOMONYCARTRADETRST181710603000000793BCGMOONPPLIYELPEVER603888.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. XinhuaNet is the large dot.

XinhuaNet competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (603888.SS vs 603000.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
XinhuaNet 603888.SS$1.89B-7%-1%8%4.5×22.6%
People.cn 603000.SS$2.69B-15%0%12%7.9×28.6%

How XinhuaNet compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

XinhuaNet against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure603888.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+0.1%+0.7%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-7.2%+0.7%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-40.8%-21.1%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.7%+6.2%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin7.7%11.0%9th lowest of 21
EV / Sales4.5×2.8×9th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)22.6%16.5%6th most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.3%+7.1%7th highest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+13.3 pp+6.2 pp6th most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.0 pp+0.7 pp5th highest of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
XinhuaNet 603888.SSChina$1.89B-7%-1%8%4.5×22.6%+9.3%
TBO Tek TBOTEK.NSIndia$1.80B+24%+74%11%4.6×n/an/a
Ziff Davis ZDUnited States$1.70B+21%-8%10%0.7×-10.6%+4.6%
Weibo 9898.HKHong Kong$1.58B-24%+2%25%0.5×n/an/a
Winning Health Technology 300253.SZChina$2.31B-19%+6%-20%6.6×18.9%-1.4%
Shanghai Great Wisdom 601519.SSChina$2.49B-18%+6%-8%18.0×n/an/a
Youdao, Inc. Sponsored ADR DAOUnited States$2.50B+59%+10%4%3.1×33.6%+17.6%
Mony MONY.LUnited Kingdom$1.42B+21%+2%26%2.4×-0.7%+5.3%
CarTrade Tech CARTRADE.NSIndia$1.39B+40%+16%30%14.9×34.5%+25.6%
Trustpilot TRST.LUnited Kingdom$1.36B+12%+19%5%4.7×32.7%+20.0%
NHN 181710.KSSouth Korea$1.34B+44%+12%6%0.6×-4.4%+8.9%
Aditya Birla Sun Life Amc ABSLAMC.NSIndia$2.68B-19%+4%60%n/an/an/a
People.cn 603000.SSChina$2.69B-15%0%12%7.9×28.6%-0.4%
WEBTOON Entertainment WBTNUnited States$1.31B-27%0%-3%0.6×n/an/a
Huawen Media 000793.SZChina$1.19B-34%0%-14%22.2×17.8%-34.6%
Baltic Classifieds BCG.LUnited Kingdom$1.14B-99%+7%68%11.6×15.2%+15.9%
Moonpig MOON.LUnited Kingdom$1.13B+41%+7%21%2.5×3.7%+0.3%
People PPLIUnited States$3.16B-4%-29%2%1.7×36.5%-2.8%
Yelp YELPUnited States$1.06B-28%+2%13%0.7×-18.4%+10.9%
Crisil CRISIL.NSIndia$3.40B+6%+24%26%n/an/an/a
EverQuote EVERUnited States$1.02B+41%+24%11%1.0×-7.0%+14.8%

Questions

Who are XinhuaNet's main competitors?
Named competitors: People.cn (603000.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes TBO Tek (TBOTEK.NS), Ziff Davis (ZD), Weibo (9898.HK), Winning Health Technology (300253.SZ), Shanghai Great Wisdom (601519.SS), Youdao, Inc. Sponsored ADR (DAO).
Is XinhuaNet expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 4.5× against a peer median of 2.8×, 9th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is +13 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has XinhuaNet stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -7.2% against +0.7% for the median peer; over one year -4.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.