Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 4732.T USS Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

USS Co., Ltd.4732.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Internet Retail

Runs Japan's largest used-car auction network where dealers buy and sell wholesale used vehicles.

≈ Japan's Manheim/Copart, for live car auctionsMomentum neutral 57
Mkt cap
$5.34B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
77%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$18.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+29.3 pp
WACC 6.4%
Hurdle
-10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥1,824
1D-4.0%
1W+3.8%
1M+1.1%
3M-7.9%
6M+7.6%
YTD+6.3%
1Y+6.7%
ATR %2.2%
52w lowhigh14.4% off high

What USS does

Runs Japan's largest used-car auction network where dealers buy and sell wholesale used vehicles.

Earns fees from both sides of each wholesale sale: sellers pay to list and sell a car, and buyers pay a fee when they win, so income follows the number of cars sold through its auctions more than the price of any one car.

In one line: Japan's Manheim/Copart, for live car auctions.

Products and services

  • Auto auctions (dealer-to-dealer)
  • Used-car purchase & resale
  • Auction-linked financial services

Customers

  • Used-car dealers across Japan
  • Exporters of used Japanese vehicles

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Auto retail/wholesale
  • Used-car auctions
  • Physical + online dealer auctions

What could go right

  • Used-car market volumes
  • Japanese used-vehicle exports to Asia/Africa

What could go wrong

  • New-car sales cycle affecting used-car supply
  • Competition from smaller regional auction houses

Moat: narrow (network effects, scale, installed base). Largest auction network by volume; dealers go where liquidity (most buyers/sellers) already is.

Headquarters: Tokai, Aichi, Japan · Founded: 1980 · Employees: 1,211

Named competitors

USS at a glance

Size USS (4732.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Internet Retail) with a market value of $5.34B, the 230th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,824 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 7.6%, against +23.0% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 15 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 11.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.5%); the operating margin is 52.1% (peer median 7.6%).

Valuation It trades at 18.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 23.3× (3rd cheapest of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 29.3 points above its cost of capital (6.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1254732.T 108
Six months, rebased to 100: USS against the median of its 14 peers (local-currency closes).

USS financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥118B¥114B¥104B¥97.6B¥88.8B
Revenue growth—+9%+7%+10%—
Gross profit¥72.2B¥70.4B¥63.8B¥58.0B¥52.7B
EBITDA¥67.1B¥65.6B¥59.5B¥54.2B¥49.1B
Net income¥42.1B¥41.4B¥37.6B¥32.9B¥30.0B
Free cash flow¥35.9B¥34.6B¥35.4B¥45.1B¥32.8B
Capital expenditure¥10.6B¥11.0B¥4.27B¥2.67B¥4.57B
Total debt¥7.31B¥2.10B¥2.25B¥2.66B¥2.42B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

USS competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%-20%0%+20%3092VIPSGLBE4385ZALETSY4755300209CHWYNYKAAGICREALLUXELQDT4732.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. USS is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×100×200×3092VIPSGLBE4385ZALNYKAAREALLUXE4732.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. USS is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%3092VIPSGLBEZALETSY4755CHWYGICLQDT4732.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. USS is the large dot.

USS competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (4732.T vs CPRT vs KAR.AX vs 3964.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
USS 4732.T$5.34B+8%+11%52%18.7×-0.8%
Copart CPRT$29.6B-6%0%35%19.7×7.2%
Karoon Energy KAR.AX$763M-23%-20%28%4.6×-10.4%
Aucnet 3964.T$824M+12%+12%15%15.5×0.1%
ACV Auctions ACVAn/a+44%n/an/an/an/a

How USS compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

USS against its 14 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure4732.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.1%+5.3%5th lowest of 15
6-month return+7.6%+23.0%5th lowest of 15
Distance from 52-week high-14.4%-13.1%8th highest of 15
Revenue growth (TTM)+11.3%+14.5%8th highest of 15
Operating margin52.1%7.6%highest of 15
Forward P/E18.7×23.3×3rd cheapest of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-0.8%7.6%4th least demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.7%+10.8%3rd lowest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-9.5 pp-4.7 pp5th least demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+29.3 pp+7.3 pp2nd highest of 12
EV / EBITDA11.5×14.4×3rd cheapest of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-1.1×0.6×3rd least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
USS 4732.TJapan$5.34B+8%+11%52%18.7×-0.8%+8.7%
Zozo 3092.TJapan$6.41B+8%+6%30%19.6×-5.0%+9.2%
Vipshop Holdings Ltd Sponsored ADR VIPSUnited States$6.55B-4%+2%7%5.4×-20.3%0.0%
Global-e Online GLBEUnited States$7.22B+44%+31%14%30.9×23.4%+47.8%
Mercari 4385.TJapan$3.76B-5%+19%19%15.6×n/an/a
Zalando ZAL.DEGermany$7.64B+42%+18%4%19.6×7.6%+9.1%
Etsy ETSYUnited States$7.75B+40%+1%18%19.7×12.8%+10.8%
Rakuten 4755.TJapan$8.59B-18%+11%6%n/a-2.0%+11.4%
Xingyun Technology 300209.SZChina$3.15B+30%+978%23%n/an/an/a
Chewy CHWYUnited States$9.07B-2%+6%3%24.1×16.8%+12.0%
FSN E-Commerce Ventures NYKAA.NSIndia$10.7B+31%+28%5%209.2×n/an/a
Global Industrial GICUnited States$1.77B+59%+10%8%22.4×1.3%+6.0%
RealReal REALUnited States$1.61B+25%+18%0%47.8×n/an/a
LuxExperience B.V. Sponsored ADR LUXEUnited States$1.40B+20%+111%-6%194.0×n/an/a
Liquidity Services LQDTUnited States$1.37B+21%+5%9%24.8×16.2%+18.3%

Questions

Who are USS's main competitors?
Named competitors: Copart (CPRT), ADESA/Manheim (KAR) (KAR.AX), Aucnet (3964.T), ACV Auctions (ACVA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Zozo (3092.T), Vipshop Holdings Ltd Sponsored ADR (VIPS), Global-e Online (GLBE), Mercari (4385.T), Zalando (ZAL.DE), Etsy (ETSY).
Is USS expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.7× against a peer median of 23.3×, 3rd cheapest of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has USS stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +7.6% against +23.0% for the median peer; over one year +6.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.