Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › VIK Viking Holdings LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

Viking Holdings LtdVIKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Hotels/Resorts/Cruise lines

Operates river and small ocean cruises marketed to older, culturally curious travelers, with an adults-focused, no-kids policy.

Momentum neutral 49
Mkt cap
$39.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
65%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$300M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
24.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+22.2 pp
WACC 10.9%
Hurdle
-8 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BB+ / BB+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
11 days
17 Nov 2026
Close · USD$87.48
1D+1.5%
1W0.0%
1M+7.2%
3M-15.7%
6M+5.8%
YTD+22.5%
1Y+53.0%
ATR %3.6%
Beta1.70
52w lowhigh20.5% off high

What Viking does

Operates river and small ocean cruises marketed to older, culturally curious travelers, with an adults-focused, no-kids policy.

Sells cruises long before sailing, so payments arrive months early, and the fare bundles shore excursions and meals, making it more all-inclusive than mass-market lines. River cruising is the original business, with ocean ships added since 2015. Founder Torstein Hagen remains chairman and the controlling shareholder.

Products and services

  • River cruises
  • Ocean cruises
  • Expedition cruises

Customers

  • Older, affluent, culturally oriented travelers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Travel & leisure
  • River & ocean cruise operation
  • Destination-focused, curated travel…

What could go right

  • Growing demand from older, higher-income travelers
  • Fleet expansion adding capacity

What could go wrong

  • High fixed costs/leverage sensitivity to demand shocks
  • Fuel and shipbuilding cost inflation

Moat: narrow (brand, scale). Dominant scale and brand in river cruising plus a distinctive no-kids, culture-focused positioning.

Headquarters: Basel, Switzerland · Founded: 1997 · Employees: 13,000

Named competitors

Viking at a glance

Size Viking (VIK) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Hotels/Resorts/Cruise lines) with a market value of $39.1B, the 302nd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $87.48 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 5.8%, against +18.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 10 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 20.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.8%); the operating margin is 23.3% (peer median 21.2%).

Valuation It trades at 24.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 23.8× (5th most expensive of 10).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +27%, so the hurdle is -8 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 22.2 points above its cost of capital (10.9% WACC).

Credit Viking has 1 bond outstanding ($1.70B), rated BB+ by the agencies and trading like BB+ at a weighted spread of 169 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.6% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 118VIK 108
Six months, rebased to 100: Viking against the median of its 9 peers (local-currency closes).

Viking financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$6.97B$6.50B$5.33B$4.71B$3.18B
Revenue growth—+22%+13%+48%—
Gross profit$2.70B$2.53B$1.96B$1.60B$747M
EBITDA$1.93B$1.79B$1.34B$1.07B$340M
Net income$1.35B$1.15B$152M-$1.85B$399M
Free cash flow$941M$1.30B$882M$339M-$957M
Capital expenditure$1.48B$1.03B$917M$674M$955M
Total debt$6.19B$5.74B$5.57B$6.94B$6.84B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Viking competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

+10%+20%+30%+10%+15%+20%CCLIHGRCLH1179MARABNBINDHOTELACVIK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Viking is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+5%+10%+15%+20%20×40×CCLIHGRCLH1179MARABNBINDHOTELACVIKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Viking is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

+20%+40%20%40%CCLIHGRCLH1179MARABNBINDHOTELACVIKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Viking is the large dot.

Viking competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (VIK vs RCL vs CCL vs NCLH)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Viking VIK$39.1B+6%+20%23%24.4×19.2%
Royal Caribbean RCL$87.5B+19%+10%27%16.4×23.2%
Carnival CCL$39.8B+13%+5%16%12.4×14.5%
Norwegian Cruise Line NCLH$8.23B+5%+5%14%13.8×n/a
Lindblad Expeditions LIND$2.23B+61%+17%8%89.0×33.0%

How Viking compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Viking against its 9 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureVIKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+7.2%+15.6%lowest of 10
6-month return+5.8%+18.1%2nd lowest of 10
Distance from 52-week high-20.5%-3.9%lowest of 10
Revenue growth (TTM)+20.0%+5.8%highest of 10
Operating margin23.3%21.2%5th highest of 10
Forward P/E24.4×23.8×5th most expensive of 10
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)19.2%17.9%5th most demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+27.0%+28.3%4th lowest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-7.8 pp-3.9 pp5th least demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+22.2 pp-1.2 pp2nd highest of 9
EV / EBITDA21.4×20.8×5th most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA1.1×3.2×3rd least indebted of 10
Bond spread169 bp103 bpwidest of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Viking VIKUnited States$39.1B+6%+20%23%24.4×19.2%+27.0%
Carnival CCLUnited States$39.8B+13%+5%16%12.4×14.5%+36.6%
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Sponsored ADR IHGUnited States$25.3B+19%+3%24%23.8×12.7%+16.6%
Royal Caribbean RCLUnited States$87.5B+19%+10%27%16.4×23.2%+52.0%
Hyatt Hotels HUnited States$17.2B+10%+3%9%42.4×27.9%+27.7%
H World 1179.HKHong Kong$15.3B+3%+13%27%18.8×6.2%+19.1%
Marriott International MARUnited States$107B+18%+6%16%32.1×17.9%+19.9%
Airbnb ABNBUnited States$114B+34%+14%21%30.7×26.0%+29.5%
Indian Hotels INDHOTEL.NSIndia$13.4B+33%+15%26%55.6×42.0%+43.8%
Accor AC.PAFrance$12.8B+12%0%16%22.9×14.4%+28.3%

Viking bonds and credit

Viking has 1 bond outstanding with $1.70B face value. The agencies rate it BB+; its bonds trade like BB+. Weighted yield 6.40%, a spread of 169 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Viking's main competitors?
Named competitors: Royal Caribbean Group (RCL), Carnival Corporation (Holland America/Seabourn) (CCL), AmaWaterways (private) (private or unlisted), Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH), Lindblad Expeditions (LIND). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Carnival (CCL), InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Sponsored ADR (IHG), Royal Caribbean (RCL), Hyatt Hotels (H), H World (1179.HK), Marriott International (MAR).
Is Viking expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 24.4× against a peer median of 23.8×, 5th most expensive of 10 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +27%, so the hurdle is -8 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Viking stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +5.8% against +18.1% for the median peer; over one year +53.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.