Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › LIND Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.LINDCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Hotels/Resorts/Cruise lines

Operates small-ship expedition cruises to remote destinations, partnered with National Geographic for adventure travel.

Momentum leader 88
Mkt cap
$2.23B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
75%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$31.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
89.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.3 pp
WACC 13.8%
Hurdle
-23 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
118 days
4 Mar 2027
Close · USD$33.98
1D+7.6%
1W-9.0%
1M-4.4%
3M+2.9%
6M+61.0%
YTD+135.6%
1Y+171.8%
ATR %5.7%
Beta1.77
52w lowhigh12.5% off high

What Lindblad Expeditions does

Operates small-ship expedition cruises to remote destinations, partnered with National Geographic for adventure travel.

Sells fixed-itinerary voyages at high ticket prices, with customers often paying deposits months ahead, which gives visibility into bookings but ties earnings to ship occupancy and fuel costs. It shares National Geographic's brand and content under a partnership, and has bought land-based adventure travel companies to add trips not needing ships.

Products and services

  • Expedition cruises
  • Land-based adventure tours
  • National Geographic-branded voyages

Customers

  • Affluent adventure/eco travelers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Travel/leisure
  • Expedition cruise operator
  • Small-ship adventure travel

What could go right

  • Demand for experiential/eco travel
  • Fleet capacity growth

What could go wrong

  • Discretionary travel spending pullback
  • Fuel and ship-financing costs

Moat: narrow (brand, installed base). National Geographic partnership and long operating history in remote regions differentiate from mass-market cruise lines.

Headquarters: New York, New York, United States · Founded: 1979 · Employees: 1,550

Named competitors

  • Viking Cruises private or unlisted
  • Silversea (Royal Caribbean) private or unlisted
  • Ponant private or unlisted
  • Quark Expeditions private or unlisted

Lindblad Expeditions at a glance

Size Lindblad Expeditions (LIND) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Hotels/Resorts/Cruise lines) with a market value of $2.23B, the 1722nd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $33.98 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 61.0%, against -0.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.7%); the operating margin is 7.5% (peer median 15.4%).

Valuation It trades at 89.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.1× (most expensive of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 33% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +56%, so the hurdle is -23 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.3 points above its cost of capital (13.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026LIND 174Peer median 100
Six months, rebased to 100: Lindblad Expeditions against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Lindblad Expeditions financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$860M$771M$645M$570M$422M
Revenue growth—+20%+13%+35%—
Gross profit$334M$290M$248M$200M$94.2M
EBITDA$138M$110M$75.0M$58.1M-$18.4M
Net income$5.78M-$29.7M-$31.2M-$45.6M-$111M
Free cash flow$108M$63.8M$58.8M-$4.52M-$40.4M
Capital expenditure$29.8M$47.7M$33.5M$30.0M$38.2M
Total debt$665M$664M$627M$624M$557M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Lindblad Expeditions competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0%+10%+20%600258HBXSHOT4681H15EIHOTELTHELEELA9616MCRICHALETMELMLCO0053SKIS-B6007540041VENTIVEITCHOTELSBAINLIND6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Lindblad Expeditions is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%25×50×75×600258HBX4681EIHOTELTHELEELA9616CHALET0069ITCHOTELSLINDRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Lindblad Expeditions is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%+80%0%25%50%75%600258HBXSHOT4681EIHOTELMCRICHALET0069SKIS-B600754VENTIVEITCHOTELSBAINLINDGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Lindblad Expeditions is the large dot.

Lindblad Expeditions competitors and peer comparison

How Lindblad Expeditions compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Lindblad Expeditions against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLINDPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.4%+7.9%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return+61.0%-0.3%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-12.5%-16.7%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.7%+5.7%5th highest of 21
Operating margin7.5%15.4%2nd lowest of 21
Forward P/E89.0×17.1×most expensive of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)33.0%2.8%2nd most demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+56.4%+19.5%4th highest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-23.4 pp-19.3 pp7th least demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.3 pp-0.7 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA19.3×13.6×6th most expensive of 19
Net debt / EBITDA2.6×2.5×9th most indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Lindblad Expeditions LINDUnited States$2.23B+61%+17%8%89.0×33.0%+56.4%
BTG Hotels (Group) Co Ltd Shs -A- 600258.SSChina$2.25B-14%-3%18%17.0×-11.1%+7.6%
Hbx Group International HBX.MCSpain$2.19B+29%+4%38%9.6×-4.2%+18.4%
Scandic Hotels SHOT.STSweden$2.29B+16%+3%13%17.2×3.2%+24.4%
Resorttrust 4681.TJapan$2.36B-1%+8%12%16.4×-6.4%+9.4%
Hotel Properties H15.SISingapore$2.07B+11%+2%7%n/an/an/a
EIH EIHOTEL.NSIndia$2.07B-7%+8%29%23.2×28.9%+42.9%
Leela Palaces Hotels & Resorts THELEELA.NSIndia$2.45B+65%+17%42%43.7×n/an/a
Kyoritsu Maintenance 9616.TJapan$2.00B+47%+20%9%16.7×2.3%+17.8%
Monarch Casino & Resort MCRIUnited States$1.92B-8%+5%27%15.6×6.7%+24.2%
Chalet Hotels CHALET.NSIndia$1.88B+2%-17%34%28.1×24.1%+57.5%
Melia Hotels International MEL.MCSpain$2.67B-10%+5%13%15.2×7.3%+31.5%
Shangri-La Asia 0069.HKHong Kong$1.87B-9%+5%35%10.6×-8.7%+16.8%
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. Sponsored ADR MLCOUnited States$1.79B-16%+6%12%7.5×-6.2%+24.5%
Guoco 0053.HKHong Kong$2.90B0%-11%13%n/a-3.9%+16.0%
SkiStar SKIS-B.STSweden$1.58B+27%+7%17%21.3×8.4%+12.5%
Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels 600754.SSChina$3.18B-16%+5%14%19.5×-8.1%+6.9%
Great Eagle 0041.HKHong Kong$1.37B-24%+75%12%n/a-0.9%+13.8%
Ventive Hospitality VENTIVE.NSIndia$1.34B-17%+15%29%26.2×29.9%+78.5%
ITC Hotels ITCHOTELS.NSIndia$3.85B+5%+65%25%34.6×37.0%+64.8%
Monte-Carlo Societe des Bains de Mer BAIN.PAFrance$4.06B+9%+12%9%n/a24.2%+20.7%

Questions

Who are Lindblad Expeditions's main competitors?
Named competitors: Viking Cruises (private or unlisted), Silversea (Royal Caribbean) (private or unlisted), Ponant (private or unlisted), Quark Expeditions (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes BTG Hotels (Group) Co Ltd Shs -A- (600258.SS), Hbx Group International (HBX.MC), Scandic Hotels (SHOT.ST), Resorttrust (4681.T), Hotel Properties (H15.SI), EIH (EIHOTEL.NS).
Is Lindblad Expeditions expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 89.0× against a peer median of 17.1×, most expensive of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 33% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +56%, so the hurdle is -23 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Lindblad Expeditions stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +61.0% against -0.3% for the median peer; over one year +171.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.