Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SPCX Space Exploration Technologies CorpOpen in the cockpit ↗

Space Exploration Technologies CorpSPCXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Communication Services›Specialty Telecommunications

Builds and launches reusable rockets (Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, Starship) and operates the Starlink satellite internet constellation.

Mkt cap
$1.82T
US dollars, full cap
Free float
52%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$15.8B
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
38.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-20.9 pp
WACC 19.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Official | Implied
BBB / BB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$134.27
1D+8.6%
1W-0.3%
1M-16.4%
3M-3.2%
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %6.2%
52w lowhigh40.5% off high

What Space Exploration Technologies does

Builds and launches reusable rockets (Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, Starship) and operates the Starlink satellite internet constellation.

Earns in two ways: launches sold per mission to NASA, the military and satellite operators, and Starlink internet service sold by subscription, with hardware terminals, to consumers, businesses and governments. Reusing rocket boosters lets it launch its own satellites cheaply, so Starlink grows on top of the launch business.

Products and services

  • Falcon 9/Falcon Heavy launch services
  • Starship next-gen launch vehicle
  • Starlink satellite internet
  • Dragon crew/cargo spacecraft

Customers

  • NASA, US government/defense agencies, commercial s
  • Starlink internet subscribers globally

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Communication Services
  • Space launch and satellite internet
  • Reusable launch vehicles + satellite…

What could go right

  • Starlink subscriber/revenue growth
  • Government/defense and commercial launch demand

What could go wrong

  • Regulatory/launch-licensing risk
  • Execution risk in Starship development timeline

Moat: wide (scale, IP / patents, cost advantage). Reusable-rocket cost advantage and launch cadence far exceed rivals; Starlink's satellite scale is also unmatched.

Headquarters: Hawthorne, California, United States · Founded: 2002

Named competitors

Space Exploration Technologies at a glance

Size Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX) is a United States Communication Services company (Specialty Telecommunications) with a market value of $1.82T, the 7th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $134.27 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth Revenue grew 33.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.5%); the operating margin is -11.1% (peer median 12.2%).

Valuation It trades at 38.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.5× (4th most expensive of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 20.9 points below its cost of capital (19.6% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $63.0B at 30 Sep 2026. Backlog detail →

Credit Space Exploration Technologies has 10 bonds outstanding ($50.2B), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BB at a weighted spread of 272 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.1% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Space Exploration Technologies financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenuen/a$18.7B$14.0B$10.4B
Revenue growth—+33%+35%—
Gross profitn/a$9.22B$6.02B$4.28B
EBITDAn/a$4.64B$4.57B$3.14B
Net incomen/a-$4.94B$98.0M-$4.63B
Free cash flown/a-$14.1B-$5.39B$105M
Capital expendituren/a$20.7B$11.2B$4.42B
Total debt$39.2B$24.5B$15.4Bn/a

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Space Exploration Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×50×100×150×60094199849432ECHOTEF07886882201U1IRDMPHIFNTN9418CC31883SPCXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Space Exploration Technologies is the large dot.

Space Exploration Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SPCX vs RKLB vs ECHO vs ETL.PA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Space Exploration Technologies SPCX$1.82Tn/a+33%-11%38.4×n/a
Rocket Lab RKLB$31.8B-50%+53%-29%n/an/a
EchoStar ECHO$27.5B-26%-20%11%25.5×n/a
Eutelsat Communications ETL.PA$2.40B-40%-1%-6%n/an/a
ViaSat VSAT$8.81B-9%+1%2%n/a42.8%
AST SpaceMobile ASTS$12.6B-57%+2,257%-410%n/an/a
Firefly Aerospace FLY$3.48B-48%+179%-116%n/an/a

How Space Exploration Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Space Exploration Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSPCXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.4%+0.9%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-40.5%-21.4%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+33.2%+3.5%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin-11.1%12.2%2nd lowest of 21
Forward P/E38.4×18.5×4th most expensive of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-20.9 pp-0.5 pp2nd lowest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA-11.0×2.7×least indebted of 17
Bond spread272 bp109 bp2nd widest of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Space Exploration Technologies SPCXUnited States$1.82Tn/a+33%-11%38.4×n/an/a
China Mobile 600941.SSChina$230B+7%-1%19%17.1×-12.6%+6.5%
Softbank 9984.TJapan$128B-32%+9%-5%18.5×n/an/a
Ntt 9432.TJapan$86.6B+5%+8%12%12.7×n/an/a
EchoStar ECHOUnited States$27.5B-26%-20%11%25.5×n/an/a
Telefonica TEF.MCSpain$21.4B-16%-11%5%10.8×11.7%-4.0%
China Tower 0788.HKHong Kong$20.2B-18%+4%20%9.7×-1.0%+3.6%
Telia TELIA.STSweden$19.2B0%0%18%21.1×-1.1%-1.9%
China Satellite Communications 601698.SSChina$13.9B-40%-2%10%n/a40.0%-0.3%
AST SpaceMobile ASTSUnited States$12.6B-57%+2,257%-410%n/an/an/a
Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane INW.MIItaly$7.39B+1%+1%53%19.4×8.2%+10.2%
ASR Microelectronics 688220.SSChina$6.56B+6%+28%1%170.1×n/an/a
1&1 1U1.DEGermany$5.79B+7%+8%3%34.4×12.5%+1.8%
Iridium Communications IRDMUnited States$4.68B+6%+4%19%64.8×21.0%+8.4%
PLDT, Inc. Sponsored ADR PHIUnited States$3.88B-11%-2%22%8.7×-2.9%+0.8%
freenet FNTN.DEGermany$3.06B-7%+10%14%11.4×-11.3%-1.1%
Helios Towers HTWS.LUnited Kingdom$3.05B-8%+6%36%30.1×13.4%+15.0%
U-NEXT 9418.TJapan$2.04B+17%+20%6%17.6×0.4%+17.7%
StarHub CC3.SISingapore$1.41B+4%-8%5%48.0×7.2%+3.0%
CITIC Telecom International 1883.HKHong Kong$1.14B-14%0%12%9.2×-10.5%+1.4%
Guomai Technologies 002093.SZChina$1.08B-14%+3%24%n/a11.7%+6.5%

Space Exploration Technologies bonds and credit

Space Exploration Technologies has 10 bonds outstanding with $50.2B face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BB. Weighted yield 7.56%, a spread of 272 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Space Exploration Technologies backlog

Space Exploration Technologies reported $63.0B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026 and up 33% from the previous quarter. Book-to-bill last quarter: 2.06.

Questions

Who are Space Exploration Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: Rocket Lab USA (RKLB), EchoStar (Hughes) (ECHO), United Launch Alliance (private or unlisted), Blue Origin (private or unlisted), Eutelsat (ETL.PA), Viasat (VSAT). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes China Mobile (600941.SS), Softbank (9984.T), Ntt (9432.T), EchoStar (ECHO), Telefonica (TEF.MC), China Tower (0788.HK).
Is Space Exploration Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 38.4× against a peer median of 18.5×, 4th most expensive of 18 in its peer set.
What is Space Exploration Technologies's backlog?
Space Exploration Technologies's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $63.0B at 30 Sep 2026.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.