Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › HTWS.L Helios Towers PlcOpen in the cockpit ↗

Helios Towers PlcHTWS.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Communication Services›Specialty Telecommunications

UK-listed operator of telecom towers across Africa, leasing space to mobile network operators.

≈ An African-focused American Tower / Crown CastleMomentum neutral 45
Mkt cap
$3.05B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
88%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.15M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
30.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.2 pp
WACC 10.3%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
132 days
18 Mar 2027
Close · GBP£220.60
1D+0.4%
1W+8.1%
1M+1.9%
3M+10.5%
6M-7.7%
YTD+34.0%
1Y+28.4%
ATR %3.1%
52w lowhigh10.9% off high

What Helios Towers does

UK-listed operator of telecom towers across Africa, leasing space to mobile network operators.

Signs long master lease agreements, often ten years or more, with annual increases and pass-through of energy costs at off-grid sites, so revenue is largely contracted, and adds income when another operator takes space on a tower already built.

In one line: An African-focused American Tower / Crown Castle.

Products and services

  • Tower colocation leasing
  • Managed services (power, maintenance)

Customers

  • Mobile network operators (MTN, Airtel, Vodacom, et

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Communication Services
  • Telecom tower infrastructure
  • Tower leasing to mobile network…

What could go right

  • African mobile data/network expansion demand
  • Improving tenancy ratio (more tenants per tower)

What could go wrong

  • African currency depreciation risk
  • Country/regulatory risk across African markets

Moat: narrow (installed base, scale, regulatory licence). Owns hard-to-permit tower sites with long-term leases and multiple tenants per tower.

Headquarters: London, UK · Founded: 2010 · Employees: 735

Named competitors

Helios Towers at a glance

Size Helios Towers (HTWS.L) is a United Kingdom Communication Services company (Specialty Telecommunications) with a market value of $3.05B, the 132nd largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £220.60 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 7.7%, against -2.9% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.5%); the operating margin is 36.2% (peer median 14.1%).

Valuation It trades at 30.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.7× (8th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 13% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.2 points above its cost of capital (10.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 96HTWS.L 91
Six months, rebased to 100: Helios Towers against the median of its 18 peers (local-currency closes).

Helios Towers financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£672M£648M£620M£580M£455M
Revenue growth—+5%+7%+27%—
Gross profit£332M£305M£273M£191M£142M
EBITDA£369M£352M£326M£295M£226M
Net income£21.0M£29.7M£26.2M-£80.5M-£139M
Free cash flow£48.0M£68.7M£44.7M-£35.2M-£155M
Capital expenditure£125M£141M£121M£158M£201M
Total debtn/a£1.48B£1.55B£1.48B£1.49B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Helios Towers competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+50%+100%+150%FNTNPHI9418IRDM688220CC3301313ITRNABB002467MAQHTWS.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Helios Towers is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0×50×100×150×FNTNPHI9418IRDM1U1688220CC3INW1883301313ITRNABBCBFMAQHTWS.LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Helios Towers is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%FNTNPHI9418IRDM1U1CC3INW1883002093ITRNABBTTML6561HTWS.LGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Helios Towers is the large dot.

Helios Towers competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (HTWS.L vs AMT vs IHS vs CCI)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Helios Towers HTWS.L$3.05B-8%+6%36%30.1×13.4%
American Tower AMT$87.6B+8%+5%44%27.8×n/a
IHS IHS$2.85B+2%-10%33%7.9×-8.3%
Crown Castle CCI$37.7B-1%-16%48%31.6×n/a

How Helios Towers compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Helios Towers against its 18 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureHTWS.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.9%+0.9%9th highest of 19
6-month return-7.7%-2.9%9th lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-10.9%-22.1%3rd highest of 19
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.0%+4.5%9th highest of 19
Operating margin36.2%14.1%4th highest of 18
Forward P/E30.1×19.7×8th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)13.4%7.2%3rd most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+15.0%+6.5%3rd highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-1.6 pp-3.7 pp6th most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.2 pp+0.0 pp6th highest of 18
EV / EBITDA10.0×8.8×6th most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA3.7×1.1×4th most indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Helios Towers HTWS.LUnited Kingdom$3.05B-8%+6%36%30.1×13.4%+15.0%
freenet FNTN.DEGermany$3.06B-7%+10%14%11.4×-11.3%-1.1%
PLDT, Inc. Sponsored ADR PHIUnited States$3.88B-11%-2%22%8.7×-2.9%+0.8%
U-NEXT 9418.TJapan$2.04B+17%+20%6%17.6×0.4%+17.7%
Iridium Communications IRDMUnited States$4.68B+6%+4%19%64.8×21.0%+8.4%
1&1 1U1.DEGermany$5.79B+7%+8%3%34.4×12.5%+1.8%
ASR Microelectronics 688220.SSChina$6.56B+6%+28%1%170.1×n/an/a
StarHub CC3.SISingapore$1.41B+4%-8%5%48.0×7.2%+3.0%
Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane INW.MIItaly$7.39B+1%+1%53%19.4×8.2%+10.2%
CITIC Telecom International 1883.HKHong Kong$1.14B-14%0%12%9.2×-10.5%+1.4%
Guomai Technologies 002093.SZChina$1.08B-14%+3%24%n/a11.7%+6.5%
Guangzhou Frontop Digital Creative Technology 301313.SZChina$1.02B+90%+1%-31%93.0×n/an/a
Ituran Location and Control ITRNUnited States$987M-18%+16%22%12.9×-3.4%+7.9%
Aussie Broadband ABB.AXAustralia$968M-13%+9%7%14.7×13.1%+29.9%
Net263 002467.SZChina$939M-33%+14%-29%n/an/an/a
cyber_Folks CBF.WAPoland$899M+8%+27%n/a40.2×n/an/a
Macquarie Technology MAQ.AXAustralia$890M-34%+6%15%58.2×n/an/a
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) TTML.NSIndia$824M-11%-1%44%n/a22.7%+2.1%
Chief Telecom 6561.TWOTaiwan$796M+2%-1%39%19.7×-0.7%+9.0%

Questions

Who are Helios Towers's main competitors?
Named competitors: American Tower Corporation (AMT), IHS Holding (IHS), Crown Castle (CCI). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes freenet (FNTN.DE), PLDT, Inc. Sponsored ADR (PHI), U-NEXT (9418.T), Iridium Communications (IRDM), 1&1 (1U1.DE), ASR Microelectronics (688220.SS).
Is Helios Towers expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 30.1× against a peer median of 19.7×, 8th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 13% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Helios Towers stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -7.7% against -2.9% for the median peer; over one year +28.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.