Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › INW.MI Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane S.p.A.Open in the cockpit ↗

Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane S.p.A.INW.MICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Italy · EUR·Communication Services›Specialty Telecommunications

Italy's largest independent mobile tower company, hosting operator antennas on long-term contracts.

≈ An Italian American Tower/Crown CastleMomentum leader 84
Mkt cap
$7.39B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
30%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.3 pp
WACC 6.1%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · EUR€7.30
1D+0.2%
1W-0.7%
1M+8.6%
3M+14.7%
6M+1.5%
YTD-7.4%
1Y-22.7%
ATR %2.3%
52w lowhigh23.1% off high

What Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane does

Italy's largest independent mobile tower company, hosting operator antennas on long-term contracts.

Leases space on its towers to mobile operators under long-term contracts, typically with inflation-linked price increases, so revenue is highly predictable and rises when an operator adds more equipment on an existing tower. It was formed from Telecom Italia's tower arm in 2015 and merged with Vodafone's Italian towers in 2020.

In one line: An Italian American Tower/Crown Castle.

Products and services

  • Macro tower hosting
  • Small cells/DAS
  • Fiber backhaul

Customers

  • TIM
  • Vodafone Italy
  • Iliad Italia
  • WindTre

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Telecom infrastructure
  • Passive tower infrastructure
  • Tower leasing & hosting

What could go right

  • New tenant additions from 5G rollout
  • Built-to-suit tower orders

What could go wrong

  • Tenant concentration (TIM, Vodafone)
  • Lease renegotiation/price pressure

Moat: narrow (installed base, switching costs, regulatory licence). Site permitting is slow, so incumbent tower locations are hard for operators to replicate.

Headquarters: Milan, Italy · Founded: 2015 · Employees: 345

Named competitors

Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane at a glance

Size Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane (INW.MI) is an Italy Communication Services company (Specialty Telecommunications) with a market value of $7.39B, the 34th largest of 123 Italy companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €7.30 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 1.5%, against -7.7% for the median peer and +3.1% for the Italy market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 14 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.9%); the operating margin is 52.7% (peer median 11.2%).

Valuation It trades at 19.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.1× (6th cheapest of 12).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.3 points below its cost of capital (6.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026INW.MI 104Peer median 91
Six months, rebased to 100: Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane against the median of its 13 peers (local-currency closes).

Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€1.07B€1.08B€1.04B€960M€853M
Revenue growth—+4%+8%+13%—
Gross profit€612M€627M€610M€558M€456M
EBITDA€967M€984M€947M€879M€783M
Net income€337M€362M€354M€339M€293M
Free cash flow€548M€485M€454M€312M€262M
Capital expenditure€259M€314M€312M€499M€425M
Total debt€5.55B€5.33B€4.64B€4.30B€4.15B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-25%0%+25%6882201U1IRDMASTS601698PHIFNTNHTWSTELIA07889418ECHOINW.MI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×50×100×150×6882201U1IRDMPHIFNTNTELIA0788TEF9418ECHOINW.MIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%1U1IRDM601698PHIFNTNHTWSTELIA0788TEF9418INW.MIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane is the large dot.

Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (INW.MI vs CLNX.MC vs AMT)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane INW.MI$7.39B+1%+1%53%19.4×8.2%
Cellnex Telecom CLNX.MC$19.6B-7%0%13%n/a29.7%
American Tower AMT$87.6B+8%+5%44%27.8×n/a

How Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane against its 13 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureINW.MIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+8.6%+1.1%3rd highest of 14
6-month return+1.5%-7.7%5th highest of 14
Distance from 52-week high-23.1%-23.0%7th lowest of 14
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.3%+3.9%6th lowest of 14
Operating margin52.7%11.2%highest of 14
Forward P/E19.4×21.1×6th cheapest of 12
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.2%6.0%6th least demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.2%+1.3%3rd highest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.0 pp-0.4 pp5th least demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.3 pp-0.7 pp7th lowest of 14
EV / EBITDA12.5×8.2×2nd most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA5.6×2.0×most indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane INW.MIItaly$7.39B+1%+1%53%19.4×8.2%+10.2%
ASR Microelectronics 688220.SSChina$6.56B+6%+28%1%170.1×n/an/a
1&1 1U1.DEGermany$5.79B+7%+8%3%34.4×12.5%+1.8%
Iridium Communications IRDMUnited States$4.68B+6%+4%19%64.8×21.0%+8.4%
AST SpaceMobile ASTSUnited States$12.6B-57%+2,257%-410%n/an/an/a
China Satellite Communications 601698.SSChina$13.9B-40%-2%10%n/a40.0%-0.3%
PLDT, Inc. Sponsored ADR PHIUnited States$3.88B-11%-2%22%8.7×-2.9%+0.8%
freenet FNTN.DEGermany$3.06B-7%+10%14%11.4×-11.3%-1.1%
Helios Towers HTWS.LUnited Kingdom$3.05B-8%+6%36%30.1×13.4%+15.0%
Telia TELIA.STSweden$19.2B0%0%18%21.1×-1.1%-1.9%
China Tower 0788.HKHong Kong$20.2B-18%+4%20%9.7×-1.0%+3.6%
Telefonica TEF.MCSpain$21.4B-16%-11%5%10.8×11.7%-4.0%
U-NEXT 9418.TJapan$2.04B+17%+20%6%17.6×0.4%+17.7%
EchoStar ECHOUnited States$27.5B-26%-20%11%25.5×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane's main competitors?
Named competitors: Cellnex Telecom (CLNX.MC), American Tower (AMT), Vantage Towers (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes ASR Microelectronics (688220.SS), 1&1 (1U1.DE), Iridium Communications (IRDM), AST SpaceMobile (ASTS), China Satellite Communications (601698.SS), PLDT, Inc. Sponsored ADR (PHI).
Is Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.4× against a peer median of 21.1×, 6th cheapest of 12 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +1.5% against -7.7% for the median peer; over one year -22.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.