Loading…

freenet AGFNTN.DECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Germany · EUR·Communication Services›Specialty Telecommunications

German mobile virtual network operator reselling mobile plans plus TV/streaming services (waipu.tv) and mobile device retail.

≈ A German MVNO like a smaller Boost Mobile plus a streaming TV serviceMomentum neutral 49
Mkt cap
$3.06B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.08M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+7.7 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · EUR€23.34
1D+0.4%
1W+2.3%
1M+4.3%
3M-1.6%
6M-7.3%
YTD-20.4%
1Y-15.7%
ATR %1.9%
52w lowhigh31.2% off high

What freenet does

German mobile virtual network operator reselling mobile plans plus TV/streaming services (waipu.tv) and mobile device retail.

Buys network capacity from German mobile operators and resells it under its own brands, earning the monthly service margin, while its debitel shops earn commissions for signing customers. waipu.tv sells TV-streaming subscriptions at flat monthly prices and has become its growth line.

In one line: A German MVNO like a smaller Boost Mobile plus a streaming TV service.

Products and services

  • Mobile services (MVNO)
  • Streaming TV (waipu.tv)
  • Mobile device retail

Customers

  • German mobile/TV consumers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Communication services
  • Telecom services & MVNO
  • Mobile resale, TV/streaming & device…

What could go right

  • Streaming TV subscriber growth
  • Stable mobile subscriber base/dividends

What could go wrong

  • MVNO wholesale cost/network dependency
  • Streaming market competition

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution, scale). Large MVNO subscriber base and growing streaming-TV platform, but resells network capacity from incumbents, limiting margin control.

Headquarters: Buedelsdorf, Germany · Founded: 1996 · Employees: 2,985

Named competitors

freenet at a glance

Size freenet (FNTN.DE) is a Germany Communication Services company (Specialty Telecommunications) with a market value of $3.06B, the 91st largest of 205 Germany companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €23.34 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 7.3%, against -3.1% for the median peer and +2.6% for the Germany market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.5%); the operating margin is 14.1% (peer median 14.9%).

Valuation It trades at 11.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 30.1× (3rd cheapest of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -1%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.7 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 96FNTN.DE 89
Six months, rebased to 100: freenet against the median of its 18 peers (local-currency closes).

freenet financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€2.74B€2.44B€2.48B€2.39B€2.56B
Revenue growth—-2%+4%-7%—
Gross profit€619M€633M€621M€477M€334M
EBITDA€531M€492M€494M€473M€450M
Net income€240M€271M€250M€158M€79.3M
Free cash flow€324M€364M€327M€347M€333M
Capital expenditure€53.3M€41.9M€43.7M€51.4M€62.9M
Total debt€836M€829M€697M€778M€928M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

freenet competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+50%+100%+150%HTWSPHI9418IRDM688220CC3INW301313ABB002467MAQFNTN.DE6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. freenet is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0×50×100×150×HTWSPHI9418IRDM1U1688220CC3INW1883301313ITRNABBCBFMAQFNTN.DERevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. freenet is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%HTWSPHI9418IRDM1U1CC3INW1883002093ITRNABBTTML6561FNTN.DEGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. freenet is the large dot.

freenet competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (FNTN.DE vs DTE.DE vs 1U1.DE vs VOD.L)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
freenet FNTN.DE$3.06B-7%+10%14%11.4×-11.3%
Deutsche Telekom DTE.DE$139B-7%+2%22%11.4×-7.7%
1&1 1U1.DE$5.79B+7%+8%3%34.4×12.5%
Vodafone Group Public VOD.L$36.3B+4%+11%10%12.1×4.2%

How freenet compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

freenet against its 18 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureFNTN.DEPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+4.3%+0.9%8th highest of 19
6-month return-7.3%-3.1%10th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-31.2%-20.5%5th lowest of 19
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.9%+4.5%6th highest of 19
Operating margin14.1%14.9%9th lowest of 18
Forward P/E11.4×30.1×3rd cheapest of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-11.3%8.2%least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)-1.1%+7.9%lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-10.2 pp-2.0 pp5th least demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+7.7 pp+0.0 pp4th highest of 18
EV / EBITDA6.6×9.4×3rd cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA1.4×1.1×7th most indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
freenet FNTN.DEGermany$3.06B-7%+10%14%11.4×-11.3%-1.1%
Helios Towers HTWS.LUnited Kingdom$3.05B-8%+6%36%30.1×13.4%+15.0%
PLDT, Inc. Sponsored ADR PHIUnited States$3.88B-11%-2%22%8.7×-2.9%+0.8%
U-NEXT 9418.TJapan$2.04B+17%+20%6%17.6×0.4%+17.7%
Iridium Communications IRDMUnited States$4.68B+6%+4%19%64.8×21.0%+8.4%
1&1 1U1.DEGermany$5.79B+7%+8%3%34.4×12.5%+1.8%
ASR Microelectronics 688220.SSChina$6.56B+6%+28%1%170.1×n/an/a
StarHub CC3.SISingapore$1.41B+4%-8%5%48.0×7.2%+3.0%
Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane INW.MIItaly$7.39B+1%+1%53%19.4×8.2%+10.2%
CITIC Telecom International 1883.HKHong Kong$1.14B-14%0%12%9.2×-10.5%+1.4%
Guomai Technologies 002093.SZChina$1.08B-14%+3%24%n/a11.7%+6.5%
Guangzhou Frontop Digital Creative Technology 301313.SZChina$1.02B+90%+1%-31%93.0×n/an/a
Ituran Location and Control ITRNUnited States$987M-18%+16%22%12.9×-3.4%+7.9%
Aussie Broadband ABB.AXAustralia$968M-13%+9%7%14.7×13.1%+29.9%
Net263 002467.SZChina$939M-33%+14%-29%n/an/an/a
cyber_Folks CBF.WAPoland$899M+8%+27%n/a40.2×n/an/a
Macquarie Technology MAQ.AXAustralia$890M-34%+6%15%58.2×n/an/a
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) TTML.NSIndia$824M-11%-1%44%n/a22.7%+2.1%
Chief Telecom 6561.TWOTaiwan$796M+2%-1%39%19.7×-0.7%+9.0%

Questions

Who are freenet's main competitors?
Named competitors: Deutsche Telekom (DTE.DE), 1&1 (1U1.DE), Vodafone Group (VOD.L). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Helios Towers (HTWS.L), PLDT, Inc. Sponsored ADR (PHI), U-NEXT (9418.T), Iridium Communications (IRDM), 1&1 (1U1.DE), ASR Microelectronics (688220.SS).
Is freenet expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.4× against a peer median of 30.1×, 3rd cheapest of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -1%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has freenet stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -7.3% against -3.1% for the median peer; over one year -15.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.