Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › CBF.WA cyber_Folks SAOpen in the cockpit ↗

cyber_Folks SACBF.WACompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Poland · PLN·Communication Services›Specialty Telecommunications

Polish web hosting and domain registration company providing hosting, cloud and cybersecurity services mainly to small businesses.

≈ A Polish web hosting/domains provider, like a regional GoDaddyMomentum neutral 49
Mkt cap
$899M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
58%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$846,463
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
40.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 9.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
10 days
16 Nov 2026
Close · PLNPLN 190.90
1D+0.5%
1W+1.0%
1M-2.6%
3M-3.2%
6M+8.2%
YTD-7.3%
1Y+2.1%
ATR %3.0%
52w lowhigh14.0% off high

What cyber_Folks does

Polish web hosting and domain registration company providing hosting, cloud and cybersecurity services mainly to small businesses.

Customers pay yearly or monthly for hosting, domains and email, with renewals making revenue recurring, while cloud and security services are sold to the same base as add-ons. It has expanded through acquisitions of other regional hosting firms.

In one line: A Polish web hosting/domains provider, like a regional GoDaddy.

Products and services

  • Web hosting services
  • Domain registration
  • Cloud services
  • Cybersecurity services

Customers

  • Small/medium businesses
  • Individual website owners in Poland/CEE

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • IT services
  • Web hosting & domains
  • Cloud & cybersecurity services

What could go right

  • SME digitalization in Poland/CEE
  • Cloud services upsell

What could go wrong

  • Hosting price competition
  • Commoditization of basic hosting/domains

Moat: narrow (switching costs, installed base, scale). Large installed base of hosting/domain customers with switching-cost lock-in.

Headquarters: Poznan, Poland · Founded: 1999

Named competitors

cyber_Folks at a glance

Size cyber_Folks (CBF.WA) is a Poland Communication Services company (Specialty Telecommunications) with a market value of $899M, the 44th largest of 83 Poland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at PLN 190.90 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 8.2%, against -13.7% for the median peer and +14.3% for the Poland market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 27.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.1%).

Valuation It trades at 40.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.7× (4th most expensive of 12).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026CBF.WA 108Peer median 85
Six months, rebased to 100: cyber_Folks against the median of its 19 peers (local-currency closes).

cyber_Folks financials

Reported figures in PLN; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenuePLN 967MPLN 856MPLN 657MPLN 480MPLN 392M
Revenue growth—+30%+37%+22%—
Gross profitn/an/aPLN 141MPLN 108MPLN 76.8M
EBITDAn/an/aPLN 173MPLN 137MPLN 100M
Net incomePLN 75.0MPLN 128MPLN 117MPLN 50.8MPLN 24.0M
Free cash flown/an/aPLN 144MPLN 95.4MPLN 74.3M
Capital expendituren/an/aPLN 26.8MPLN 17.7MPLN 13.4M
Total debtPLN 774Mn/aPLN 230MPLN 284MPLN 346M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

cyber_Folks competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+50%+100%+150%MAQ002467ABBTTMLITRN6561301313002093TSAT093320CC39418CBF.WA6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. cyber_Folks is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%25×50×75×MAQABBITRN65613013131883093320CC39418HTWSFNTNCBF.WARevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. cyber_Folks is the large dot.

cyber_Folks competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CBF.WA vs GDDY vs OVH.PA vs IOS.DE)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
cyber_Folks CBF.WA$899M+8%+27%n/a40.2×n/a
GoDaddy GDDY$13.9B+26%+7%26%12.9×-2.2%
OVH Groupe OVH.PA$2.41B+17%+6%38%46.6×n/a
IONOS IOS.DE$5.49B+23%-34%23%19.1×11.0%

How cyber_Folks compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

cyber_Folks against its 19 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCBF.WAPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.6%+1.0%7th lowest of 20
6-month return+8.2%-13.7%4th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-14.0%-31.1%5th highest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)+27.1%+5.1%highest of 20
Forward P/E40.2×19.7×4th most expensive of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
cyber_Folks CBF.WAPoland$899M+8%+27%n/a40.2×n/an/a
Macquarie Technology MAQ.AXAustralia$890M-34%+6%15%58.2×n/an/a
Net263 002467.SZChina$939M-33%+14%-29%n/an/an/a
Aussie Broadband ABB.AXAustralia$968M-13%+9%7%14.7×13.1%+29.9%
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) TTML.NSIndia$824M-11%-1%44%n/a22.7%+2.1%
Ituran Location and Control ITRNUnited States$987M-18%+16%22%12.9×-3.4%+7.9%
Chief Telecom 6561.TWOTaiwan$796M+2%-1%39%19.7×-0.7%+9.0%
Guangzhou Frontop Digital Creative Technology 301313.SZChina$1.02B+90%+1%-31%93.0×n/an/a
Guomai Technologies 002093.SZChina$1.08B-14%+3%24%n/a11.7%+6.5%
CITIC Telecom International 1883.HKHong Kong$1.14B-14%0%12%9.2×-10.5%+1.4%
Telesat TSAT.TOCanada$644M-18%-24%-8%n/an/an/a
KINX 093320.KSSouth Korea$623M+68%+7%19%32.8×7.8%+17.7%
Eastone Century Technology 300310.SZChina$575M-24%+3%0%n/an/an/a
StarHub CC3.SISingapore$1.41B+4%-8%5%48.0×7.2%+3.0%
Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks 605388.SSChina$524M-15%+5%-19%n/an/an/a
Beijing Waluer Information Technology 301380.SZChina$440M-14%+7%7%n/a16.4%+16.4%
U-NEXT 9418.TJapan$2.04B+17%+20%6%17.6×0.4%+17.7%
Shunya International Martech (Beijing) 300612.SZChina$341M-17%-45%-24%n/an/an/a
Helios Towers HTWS.LUnited Kingdom$3.05B-8%+6%36%30.1×13.4%+15.0%
freenet FNTN.DEGermany$3.06B-7%+10%14%11.4×-11.3%-1.1%

Questions

Who are cyber_Folks's main competitors?
Named competitors: GoDaddy (GDDY), OVHcloud (OVH.PA), IONOS Group (IOS.DE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Macquarie Technology (MAQ.AX), Net263 (002467.SZ), Aussie Broadband (ABB.AX), Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) (TTML.NS), Ituran Location and Control (ITRN), Chief Telecom (6561.TWO).
Is cyber_Folks expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 40.2× against a peer median of 19.7×, 4th most expensive of 12 in its peer set.
How has cyber_Folks stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +8.2% against -13.7% for the median peer; over one year +2.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.