Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 605388.SS Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks Co., Ltd. Class A605388.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Communication Services›Specialty Telecommunications
Momentum strong 62
Mkt cap
$524M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$26.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-20.3 pp
WACC 7.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥5.95
1D-2.0%
1W+5.3%
1M-14.1%
3M+0.7%
6M-15.1%
YTD-20.0%
1Y-21.5%
ATR %7.7%
52w lowhigh34.6% off high

What Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks does

Employees: 1,176

Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks at a glance

Size Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks (605388.SS) is a China Communication Services company (Specialty Telecommunications) with a market value of $524M, the 3748th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥5.95 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 15.1%, against -13.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 18 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.5%); the operating margin is -19.3% (peer median 6.8%).

Valuation It trades at 2.3× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 4.3× (7th cheapest of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 20.3 points below its cost of capital (7.6% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 85605388.SS 83
Six months, rebased to 100: Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks against the median of its 17 peers (local-currency closes).

Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.45BCN¥1.33BCN¥1.46BCN¥1.63BCN¥980M
Revenue growth—-9%-11%+66%—
Gross profitCN¥504MCN¥328MCN¥401MCN¥368MCN¥333M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥146MCN¥36.7MCN¥92.8MCN¥74.4M
Net income-CN¥207M-CN¥190M-CN¥29.1MCN¥57.6MCN¥76.7M
Free cash flow-CN¥81.6M-CN¥21.0M-CN¥49.9M-CN¥92.9M-CN¥416M
Capital expenditureCN¥90.6MCN¥49.9MCN¥88.4MCN¥179MCN¥152M
Total debtCN¥34.4MCN¥54.7MCN¥57.0MCN¥62.4MCN¥22.5M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+50%+100%+150%300310301380093320TSAT6561TTMLMAQCBF002467ITRN301313CC3605388.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%0×10×20×300310301380093320TSAT6561300612TTMLCBF002467ABBITRN3013130020931883CC39418605388.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks is the large dot.

Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks competitors and peer comparison

How Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks against its 17 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure605388.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-14.1%+0.8%lowest of 18
6-month return-15.1%-13.7%7th lowest of 18
Distance from 52-week high-34.6%-27.1%7th lowest of 18
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.1%+3.5%9th highest of 18
Operating margin-19.3%6.8%4th lowest of 17
EV / Sales2.3×4.3×7th cheapest of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-20.3 pp+0.3 pp3rd lowest of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks 605388.SSChina$524M-15%+5%-19%2.3×n/an/a
Eastone Century Technology 300310.SZChina$575M-24%+3%0%1.4×n/an/a
Beijing Waluer Information Technology 301380.SZChina$440M-14%+7%7%2.6×16.4%+16.4%
KINX 093320.KSSouth Korea$623M+68%+7%19%5.4×7.8%+17.7%
Telesat TSAT.TOCanada$644M-18%-24%-8%14.2×n/an/a
Chief Telecom 6561.TWOTaiwan$796M+2%-1%39%7.1×-0.7%+9.0%
Shunya International Martech (Beijing) 300612.SZChina$341M-17%-45%-24%7.6×n/an/a
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) TTML.NSIndia$824M-11%-1%44%22.9×22.7%+2.1%
Macquarie Technology MAQ.AXAustralia$890M-34%+6%15%3.4×n/an/a
cyber_Folks CBF.WAPoland$899M+8%+27%n/a4.3×n/an/a
Net263 002467.SZChina$939M-33%+14%-29%6.6×n/an/a
Aussie Broadband ABB.AXAustralia$968M-13%+9%7%1.2×13.1%+29.9%
Ituran Location and Control ITRNUnited States$987M-18%+16%22%2.3×-3.4%+7.9%
Guangzhou Frontop Digital Creative Technology 301313.SZChina$1.02B+90%+1%-31%12.8×n/an/a
Guomai Technologies 002093.SZChina$1.08B-14%+3%24%10.8×11.7%+6.5%
CITIC Telecom International 1883.HKHong Kong$1.14B-14%0%12%1.1×-10.5%+1.4%
StarHub CC3.SISingapore$1.41B+4%-8%5%1.4×7.2%+3.0%
U-NEXT 9418.TJapan$2.04B+17%+20%6%0.8×0.4%+17.7%

Questions

Which companies are Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Eastone Century Technology (300310.SZ), Beijing Waluer Information Technology (301380.SZ), KINX (093320.KS), Telesat (TSAT.TO), Chief Telecom (6561.TWO), Shunya International Martech (Beijing) (300612.SZ), Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) (TTML.NS), Macquarie Technology (MAQ.AX).
Is Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.3× against a peer median of 4.3×, 7th cheapest of 18 in its peer set.
How has Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -15.1% against -13.7% for the median peer; over one year -21.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.