Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 0788.HK China Tower Corp. Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

China Tower Corp. Ltd. Class H0788.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Communication Services›Specialty Telecommunications

World's largest telecom tower company, leasing tower infrastructure to China's three state carriers.

≈ China's American Tower, a captive tower-leasing monopoly for the three carriersMomentum neutral 57
Mkt cap
$20.2B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$17.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.7 pp
WACC 6.0%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
136 days
22 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$9.07
1D-0.4%
1W+1.3%
1M+1.1%
3M-6.8%
6M-17.6%
YTD-21.5%
1Y-20.5%
ATR %1.6%
52w lowhigh29.4% off high

What China Tower does

World's largest telecom tower company, leasing tower infrastructure to China's three state carriers.

Almost all revenue is rent paid by the three carriers that also own it, for mounting equipment on its towers under long-term service agreements, so extra tenants on the same tower add revenue at little added cost. Indoor coverage systems and backup-power or battery-swap services were added as smaller lines after the 2018 listing.

In one line: China's American Tower, a captive tower-leasing monopoly for the three carriers.

Products and services

  • Macro tower site leasing
  • Indoor distributed antenna systems (DAS)
  • Smart energy/IoT solutions

Customers

  • China Mobile
  • China Unicom
  • China Telecom

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Communication services
  • Telecom infrastructure
  • Tower/site leasing to mobile carriers

What could go right

  • 5G network densification tower orders
  • New tenant co-location revenue

What could go wrong

  • Carrier capex cyclicality
  • Regulated tower-leasing pricing

Moat: wide (scale, installed base, regulatory licence). Sole national tower-sharing platform for all three carriers, with the world's largest tower portfolio.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Founded: 2014 · Employees: 25,074

Named competitors

China Tower at a glance

Size China Tower (0788.HK) is a Hong Kong Communication Services company (Specialty Telecommunications) with a market value of $20.2B, the 90th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$9.07 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 17.6%, against -8.0% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 9 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 3.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.6%); the operating margin is 19.9% (peer median 7.6%).

Valuation It trades at 9.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 23.3× (cheapest of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.7 points below its cost of capital (6.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 22 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 930788.HK 82
Six months, rebased to 100: China Tower against the median of its 8 peers (local-currency closes).

China Tower financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$111BHK$109BHK$106BHK$104BHK$107B
Revenue growth—+3%+2%-3%—
Gross profitHK$37.4BHK$31.1BHK$28.7BHK$28.0BHK$28.7B
EBITDAHK$68.9BHK$71.1BHK$71.6BHK$70.6BHK$74.6B
Net incomeHK$15.0BHK$12.6BHK$11.6BHK$10.8BHK$10.2B
Free cash flowHK$6.09BHK$26.2BHK$19.6B-HK$2.47BHK$40.3B
Capital expenditureHK$31.0BHK$33.1BHK$32.3BHK$37.0BHK$33.3B
Total debtn/aHK$101BHK$98.5BHK$104BHK$89.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

China Tower competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-25%0%+25%TELIATEFECHO601698ASTSINW6882201U10788.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. China Tower is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×50×100×150×TELIATEFECHOINW6882201U10788.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. China Tower is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%+40%0%20%40%TELIATEF601698INW1U10788.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. China Tower is the large dot.

China Tower competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (0788.HK vs AMT vs CCI vs 0941.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
China Tower 0788.HK$20.2B-18%+4%20%9.7×-1.0%
American Tower AMT$87.6B+8%+5%44%27.8×n/a
Crown Castle CCI$37.7B-1%-16%48%31.6×n/a
China Mobile 0941.HK$227B-2%+4%19%11.3×-16.3%

How China Tower compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

China Tower against its 8 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure0788.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.1%+3.7%4th lowest of 9
6-month return-17.6%-8.0%4th lowest of 9
Distance from 52-week high-29.4%-21.4%4th lowest of 9
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.9%+0.6%4th highest of 9
Operating margin19.9%7.6%2nd highest of 9
Forward P/E9.7×23.3×cheapest of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.0%11.7%2nd least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.6%-0.3%2nd highest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.6 pp+10.8 ppleast demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.7 pp-3.0 pp3rd highest of 9
EV / EBITDA3.9×8.8×cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA1.6×2.5×3rd least indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
China Tower 0788.HKHong Kong$20.2B-18%+4%20%9.7×-1.0%+3.6%
Telia TELIA.STSweden$19.2B0%0%18%21.1×-1.1%-1.9%
Telefonica TEF.MCSpain$21.4B-16%-11%5%10.8×11.7%-4.0%
EchoStar ECHOUnited States$27.5B-26%-20%11%25.5×n/an/a
China Satellite Communications 601698.SSChina$13.9B-40%-2%10%n/a40.0%-0.3%
AST SpaceMobile ASTSUnited States$12.6B-57%+2,257%-410%n/an/an/a
Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane INW.MIItaly$7.39B+1%+1%53%19.4×8.2%+10.2%
ASR Microelectronics 688220.SSChina$6.56B+6%+28%1%170.1×n/an/a
1&1 1U1.DEGermany$5.79B+7%+8%3%34.4×12.5%+1.8%

Questions

Who are China Tower's main competitors?
Named competitors: American Tower (AMT), Crown Castle (CCI), China Mobile (0941.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Telia (TELIA.ST), Telefonica (TEF.MC), EchoStar (ECHO), China Satellite Communications (601698.SS), AST SpaceMobile (ASTS), Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane (INW.MI).
Is China Tower expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.7× against a peer median of 23.3×, cheapest of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has China Tower stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -17.6% against -8.0% for the median peer; over one year -20.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.