Loading…

SchlumbergerSLBCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Contract Drilling

World's largest oilfield-services company, providing drilling, reservoir evaluation and production technology to oil and gas producers.

Momentum neutral 46
Mkt cap
$73.7B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$647M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.2 pp
WACC 8.4%
Hurdle
-1 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
A+ / A
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
70 days
15 Jan 2027
Close · USD$49.92
1D+0.6%
1W-7.1%
1M+1.9%
3M-6.2%
6M-6.3%
YTD+30.8%
1Y+38.5%
ATR %3.5%
Beta0.70
52w lowhigh17.4% off high

What Schlumberger does

World's largest oilfield-services company, providing drilling, reservoir evaluation and production technology to oil and gas producers.

Is paid by oil and gas producers under contracts for services and equipment tied to wells and fields, so revenue follows producers' spending rather than oil prices directly. Outside North America, including the Middle East and offshore projects, carries most of the business. It was renamed from Schlumberger to SLB in 2022.

Products and services

  • Drilling services & technology
  • Reservoir evaluation
  • Production systems
  • Digital/AI for E&P

Customers

  • National oil companies
  • International oil majors
  • Independent E&P operators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy
  • Oilfield services
  • Drilling, evaluation & production tech

What could go right

  • Global upstream capex cycle
  • Digital/AI adoption in E&P

What could go wrong

  • Oil price downturns cutting capex
  • North America shale slowdown

Moat: narrow (scale, IP / patents, installed base). Global technology scale and deep operator relationships across basins worldwide.

Headquarters: Houston, US · Founded: 1926 · Employees: 109,000

Named competitors

Schlumberger at a glance

Size Schlumberger (SLB) is a United States Energy company (Contract Drilling) with a market value of $73.7B, the 183rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $49.92 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 6.3%, against -15.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.7%); the operating margin is 13.7% (peer median 11.2%).

Valuation It trades at 17.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.8× (8th most expensive of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -1 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.2 points above its cost of capital (8.4% WACC).

Credit Schlumberger has 14 bonds outstanding ($7.60B), rated A+ by the agencies and trading like A at a weighted spread of 56 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 3.8% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 15 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026SLB 91Peer median 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Schlumberger against the median of its 18 peers (local-currency closes).

Schlumberger financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$36.9B$35.7B$36.3B$33.1B$28.2B
Revenue growth—-2%+10%+18%—
Gross profit$6.07B$5.98B$7.65B$6.48B$5.49B
EBITDA$7.48B$7.04B$8.40B$7.17B$6.15B
Net income$3.10B$3.37B$4.46B$4.20B$3.44B
Free cash flow$4.56B$4.79B$4.67B$4.70B$2.10B
Capital expenditure$2.10B$1.95B$2.13B$2.09B$1.72B
Total debt$12.8B$12.5B$12.8B$12.8B$12.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Schlumberger competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%BKR2883NERIG1033HPSDRLODLPDNBRBORRMDIENHESIVTURAPHXAKASTSLB6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Schlumberger is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%10×20×30×BKR2883NERIGVAL1033HPSDRLODLPDMDIENHESIAKASTSLBRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Schlumberger is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%BKR2883NERIG1033HPSDRLPDNBRMDIENHESIVTURASLBGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Schlumberger is the large dot.

Schlumberger competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SLB vs HAL vs BKR vs WFRD)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Schlumberger SLB$73.7B-6%+5%14%17.2×7.3%
Halliburton HAL$26.3B-20%+2%13%11.7×-0.3%
Baker Hughes BKR$47.5B-25%+4%12%17.4×10.0%
Weatherford International WFRD$6.12B-17%-6%14%13.4×-4.0%

How Schlumberger compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Schlumberger against its 18 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSLBPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.9%-5.2%5th highest of 19
6-month return-6.3%-15.3%6th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-17.4%-28.5%4th highest of 19
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.6%+5.7%9th lowest of 19
Operating margin13.7%11.2%7th highest of 19
Forward P/E17.2×14.8×8th most expensive of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)7.3%11.6%6th least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.6%+10.9%7th lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-1.4 pp+3.7 pp6th least demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.2 pp-3.4 pp4th highest of 19
EV / EBITDA11.2×7.0×4th most expensive of 19
Net debt / EBITDA1.2×1.6×8th least indebted of 19
Bond spread56 bp173 bptightest of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Schlumberger SLBUnited States$73.7B-6%+5%14%17.2×7.3%+8.6%
Baker Hughes BKRUnited States$47.5B-25%+4%12%17.4×10.0%+6.0%
China Oilfield Services 2883.HKHong Kong$7.31B-18%+7%12%6.7×-10.3%+10.9%
Noble NEUnited States$6.53B-18%-13%11%36.8×19.0%+27.8%
Transocean RIGUnited States$5.85B-18%+4%21%19.4×3.8%+4.7%
Valaris VALUnited States$5.54B-16%-12%11%11.1×n/an/a
Sinopec Oilfield Service 1033.HKHong Kong$4.72B-14%+3%2%13.8×12.0%+2.7%
Helmerich & Payne HPUnited States$3.52B-7%+17%3%26.3×19.9%+16.1%
Seadrill SDRLUnited States$2.63B-13%+17%10%15.8×16.0%+6.3%
Odfjell Drilling ODL.OLNorway$2.57B+4%+11%23%10.0×n/an/a
Precision Drilling PD.TOCanada$1.16B+6%+8%7%11.4×11.6%+14.5%
Nabors Industries NBRUnited States$1.11B-25%+5%8%19.1×4.0%+8.3%
Borr Drilling BORRUnited States$1,000M-45%+3%21%n/an/an/a
Major Drilling Group International MDI.TOCanada$893M-5%+23%6%23.1×21.7%+15.5%
Sed Energy ENH.OLNorway$520M-25%+91%36%5.7×-10.9%+38.2%
Ensign Energy Services ESI.TOCanada$517M+6%-1%1%34.7×41.1%+11.8%
Ventura Offshore VTURA.OLNorway$371M+3%-2%34%n/a3.6%-2.5%
PHX Energy Services PHX.TOCanada$342M-9%+7%4%8.9×n/an/a
Akastor AKAST.OLNorway$316M-31%+67%34%9.9×n/an/a

Schlumberger bonds and credit

Schlumberger has 14 bonds outstanding with $7.60B face value. The agencies rate it A+; its bonds trade like A. Weighted yield 5.17%, a spread of 56 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Schlumberger's main competitors?
Named competitors: Halliburton (HAL), Baker Hughes (BKR), Weatherford International (WFRD). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Baker Hughes (BKR), China Oilfield Services (2883.HK), Noble (NE), Transocean (RIG), Valaris (VAL), Sinopec Oilfield Service (1033.HK).
Is Schlumberger expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.2× against a peer median of 14.8×, 8th most expensive of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -1 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Schlumberger stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -6.3% against -15.3% for the median peer; over one year +38.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.