Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › NE Noble Corporation PLC Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Noble Corporation PLC Class ANECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Contract Drilling

Offshore drilling contractor operating a fleet of floaters and jackups for oil and gas companies worldwide.

Momentum weak 36
Mkt cap
$6.53B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
80%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$62.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
36.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.5 pp
WACC 9.1%
Hurdle
-9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
103 days
17 Feb 2027
Close · USD$40.87
1D+2.5%
1W-16.6%
1M-3.0%
3M-6.2%
6M-18.5%
YTD+44.7%
1Y+42.5%
ATR %5.1%
Beta0.07
52w lowhigh25.7% off high

What Noble does

Offshore drilling contractor operating a fleet of floaters and jackups for oil and gas companies worldwide.

Rents rigs and crews to oil companies by the day under contracts that run from months to several years, so earnings are the day rate times the number of days rigs are working, and the backlog of signed contracts shows how much is already booked. The 2022 Maersk Drilling and 2024 Diamond Offshore mergers made it a much larger owner of floating and jackup rigs.

Products and services

  • Floating rigs (drillships, semisubmersibles)
  • Jackup rigs

Customers

  • Oil majors and national oil companies needing offs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy
  • Contract drilling
  • Offshore drilling rigs

What could go right

  • Offshore/deepwater E&P capex recovery
  • Rig utilization and day-rate gains

What could go wrong

  • Offshore capex cyclicality
  • Rig oversupply risk

Moat: none (installed base). Rig fleets are largely commoditized; day rates driven by offshore drilling supply/demand cycles.

Headquarters: Sugar Land, Texas, US · Founded: 1921 · Employees: 4,500

Named competitors

Noble at a glance

Size Noble (NE) is a United States Energy company (Contract Drilling) with a market value of $6.53B, the 999th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $40.87 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 18.5%, against -14.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 13.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.0%); the operating margin is 11.3% (peer median 11.0%).

Valuation It trades at 36.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.1× (most expensive of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +28%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.5 points below its cost of capital (9.1% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $97.1M at 31 Dec 2025, down 5% on a year earlier — 0.0 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 9.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 84NE 80
Six months, rebased to 100: Noble against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Noble financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$3.00B$3.29B$3.06B$2.59B$1.41B
Revenue growth—+7%+18%+83%—
Gross profit$452M$648M$837M$744M$305M
EBITDA$907M$1.10B$1.12B$917M$370M
Net income$53.7M$217M$448M$482M$169M
Free cash flow$33.3M$432M$80.2M$165M$107M
Capital expenditure$652M$520M$575M$410M$174M
Total debt$1.89B$2.04B$2.06B$612M$720M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Noble competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%-10%0%-10%-5%0%RIG601808VAL1033HPSDRLODLNE6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Noble is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%10×20×30×RIG601808VAL1033HPSDRLODLNERevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Noble is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%RIG6018081033HPSDRLNEGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Noble is the large dot.

Noble competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (NE vs RIG vs VAL vs BORR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Noble NE$6.53B-18%-13%11%36.8×19.0%
Transocean RIG$5.85B-18%+4%21%19.4×3.8%
Valaris VAL$5.54B-16%-12%11%11.1×n/a
Borr Drilling BORR$1,000M-45%+3%21%n/an/a

How Noble compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Noble against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureNEPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.0%-5.0%4th highest of 8
6-month return-18.5%-14.5%lowest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-25.7%-30.1%3rd highest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)-13.1%+4.0%lowest of 8
Operating margin11.3%11.0%4th highest of 8
Forward P/E36.8×14.1×most expensive of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)19.0%12.0%2nd most demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+27.8%+6.3%highest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-8.8 pp+3.7 pp2nd least demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.5 pp-3.7 pp3rd lowest of 8
EV / EBITDA8.9×7.0×2nd most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA1.7×1.9×4th least indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Noble NEUnited States$6.53B-18%-13%11%36.8×19.0%+27.8%
Transocean RIGUnited States$5.85B-18%+4%21%19.4×3.8%+4.7%
China Oilfield Services 601808.SSChina$7.30B-16%+3%12%14.1×-16.5%+11.7%
Valaris VALUnited States$5.54B-16%-12%11%11.1×n/an/a
Sinopec Oilfield Service 1033.HKHong Kong$4.72B-14%+3%2%13.8×12.0%+2.7%
Helmerich & Payne HPUnited States$3.52B-7%+17%3%26.3×19.9%+16.1%
Seadrill SDRLUnited States$2.63B-13%+17%10%15.8×16.0%+6.3%
Odfjell Drilling ODL.OLNorway$2.57B+4%+11%23%10.0×n/an/a

Noble backlog

Noble reported $97.1M of remaining performance obligations at 31 Dec 2025, down 5% from a year earlier. That is 0.0 years of trailing revenue already under contract.

Questions

Who are Noble's main competitors?
Named competitors: Transocean (RIG), Valaris (VAL), Borr Drilling (BORR). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Transocean (RIG), China Oilfield Services (601808.SS), Valaris (VAL), Sinopec Oilfield Service (1033.HK), Helmerich & Payne (HP), Seadrill (SDRL).
Is Noble expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 36.8× against a peer median of 14.1×, most expensive of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +28%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Noble stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -18.5% against -14.5% for the median peer; over one year +42.5%.
What is Noble's backlog?
Noble's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $97.1M at 31 Dec 2025, -5% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.