Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 601808.SS China Oilfield Services Limited Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

China Oilfield Services Limited Class A601808.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Energy›Contract Drilling

Offshore oilfield services company providing drilling, well and geophysical services, a subsidiary of CNOOC.

≈ China's Halliburton/Transocean for offshore servicesMomentum strong 75
Mkt cap
$7.30B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
16%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$43.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+9.9 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-28 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
139 days
25 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥12.75
1D-0.3%
1W-6.4%
1M+1.5%
3M+0.6%
6M-15.6%
YTD-9.2%
1Y-10.3%
ATR %3.4%
52w lowhigh41.6% off high

What China Oilfield Services does

Offshore oilfield services company providing drilling, well and geophysical services, a subsidiary of CNOOC.

Charges daily rates for rigs and vessels and per-job fees for well and seismic services, with a large share of the work for its parent CNOOC, so activity follows CNOOC's offshore spending. It also serves other operators abroad, including in Norway and the Middle East. The same company trades in Hong Kong as 2883.

In one line: China's Halliburton/Transocean for offshore services.

Products and services

  • Offshore drilling services
  • Well services
  • Geophysical/seismic services

Customers

  • CNOOC
  • Other offshore oil/gas operators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy
  • Contract Drilling
  • Offshore oilfield services

What could go right

  • Offshore oil/gas capex cycle upturn

What could go wrong

  • Oil price volatility
  • CNOOC customer concentration

Moat: narrow (installed base, customer qualification). CNOOC-affiliated fleet and long-term offshore contracts give stable, qualified demand.

Headquarters: Tianjin, China · Founded: 1982 · Employees: 15,533

Named competitors

China Oilfield Services at a glance

Size China Oilfield Services (601808.SS) is a China Energy company (Contract Drilling) with a market value of $7.30B, the 336th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥12.75 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 15.6%, against -14.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 3.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.0%); the operating margin is 12.0% (peer median 11.0%).

Valuation It trades at 14.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.8× (4th cheapest of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -28 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.9 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026601808.SS 86Peer median 84
Six months, rebased to 100: China Oilfield Services against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

China Oilfield Services financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥51.2BCN¥50.3BCN¥48.3BCN¥44.1BCN¥35.6B
Revenue growth—+4%+9%+24%—
Gross profitCN¥14.1BCN¥8.35BCN¥7.18BCN¥6.66BCN¥4.12B
EBITDAn/aCN¥13.1BCN¥11.4BCN¥10.4BCN¥7.75B
Net incomeCN¥3.87BCN¥3.84BCN¥3.14BCN¥3.01BCN¥2.36B
Free cash flowCN¥5.61BCN¥5.02BCN¥4.69BCN¥2.99BCN¥2.20B
Capital expenditureCN¥5.34BCN¥5.89BCN¥6.03BCN¥9.47BCN¥4.14B
Total debtCN¥15.1BCN¥16.9BCN¥17.9BCN¥21.7BCN¥22.3B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

China Oilfield Services competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%-10%0%-10%-5%0%NERIGVAL1033HPSDRLODL601808.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. China Oilfield Services is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%10×20×30×NERIGVAL1033HPSDRLODL601808.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. China Oilfield Services is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%NERIG1033HPSDRL601808.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. China Oilfield Services is the large dot.

China Oilfield Services competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (601808.SS vs HAL vs RIG vs SLB)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
China Oilfield Services 601808.SS$7.30B-16%+3%12%14.1×-16.5%
Halliburton HAL$26.3B-20%+2%13%11.7×-0.3%
Transocean RIG$5.85B-18%+4%21%19.4×3.8%
Schlumberger SLB$73.7B-6%+5%14%17.2×7.3%

How China Oilfield Services compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

China Oilfield Services against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure601808.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.5%-5.0%2nd highest of 8
6-month return-15.6%-14.5%4th lowest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-41.6%-26.9%2nd lowest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.4%+4.0%4th lowest of 8
Operating margin12.0%11.0%3rd highest of 8
Forward P/E14.1×15.8×4th cheapest of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-16.5%16.0%least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.7%+6.3%3rd highest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-28.2 pp+3.7 ppleast demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+9.9 pp-4.5 pphighest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA0.7×1.9×2nd least indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
China Oilfield Services 601808.SSChina$7.30B-16%+3%12%14.1×-16.5%+11.7%
Noble NEUnited States$6.53B-18%-13%11%36.8×19.0%+27.8%
Transocean RIGUnited States$5.85B-18%+4%21%19.4×3.8%+4.7%
Valaris VALUnited States$5.54B-16%-12%11%11.1×n/an/a
Sinopec Oilfield Service 1033.HKHong Kong$4.72B-14%+3%2%13.8×12.0%+2.7%
Helmerich & Payne HPUnited States$3.52B-7%+17%3%26.3×19.9%+16.1%
Seadrill SDRLUnited States$2.63B-13%+17%10%15.8×16.0%+6.3%
Odfjell Drilling ODL.OLNorway$2.57B+4%+11%23%10.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are China Oilfield Services's main competitors?
Named competitors: Halliburton (HAL), Transocean (RIG), Schlumberger (SLB) (SLB). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Noble (NE), Transocean (RIG), Valaris (VAL), Sinopec Oilfield Service (1033.HK), Helmerich & Payne (HP), Seadrill (SDRL).
Is China Oilfield Services expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.1× against a peer median of 15.8×, 4th cheapest of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -28 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has China Oilfield Services stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -15.6% against -14.5% for the median peer; over one year -10.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.