Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1033.HK Sinopec Oilfield Service Corporation Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Sinopec Oilfield Service Corporation Class H1033.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Energy›Contract Drilling

Sinopec's oilfield services arm, providing drilling, well logging and engineering services to China's oil and gas industry.

≈ China's Halliburton/Schlumberger unitMomentum strong 67
Mkt cap
$4.72B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
52%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.76M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.6 pp
WACC 6.2%
Hurdle
+9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
137 days
23 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$0.65
1D-0.8%
1W+3.2%
1M+1.6%
3M+0.8%
6M-14.5%
YTD-7.1%
1Y-18.8%
ATR %2.9%
52w lowhigh65.4% off high

What Sinopec Oilfield Service does

Sinopec's oilfield services arm, providing drilling, well logging and engineering services to China's oil and gas industry.

Is paid by contract for drilling, logging and engineering work, and much of that work comes from Sinopec group's own oil and gas fields, so volume follows the parent's upstream spending more than an open market. Sinopec Group controls the company, which also takes some contracts from other Chinese oil firms.

In one line: China's Halliburton/Schlumberger unit.

Products and services

  • Drilling services
  • Well logging & downhole services
  • Geophysical/seismic services
  • Engineering & construction

Customers

  • Sinopec Group & other Chinese oil companies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy services
  • Oilfield drilling & well services
  • Upstream oil & gas support

What could go right

  • China upstream capex on domestic oil/gas security

What could go wrong

  • Oil price cycle
  • Customer concentration in Sinopec Group

Moat: narrow (installed base, scale, customer qualification). Captive, large-scale supplier to state-owned Sinopec's upstream operations.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Founded: 2011 · Employees: 57,076

Named competitors

Sinopec Oilfield Service at a glance

Size Sinopec Oilfield Service (1033.HK) is a Hong Kong Energy company (Contract Drilling) with a market value of $4.72B, the 264th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$0.65 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 14.5%, against -15.6% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 3.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.0%); the operating margin is 2.3% (peer median 11.3%).

Valuation It trades at 13.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.8× (3rd cheapest of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.6 points below its cost of capital (6.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 841033.HK 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Sinopec Oilfield Service against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Sinopec Oilfield Service financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$90.7BHK$87.5BHK$87.9BHK$88.4BHK$85.8B
Revenue growth—0%-1%+3%—
Gross profitHK$7.01BHK$6.74BHK$6.42BHK$5.81BHK$6.28B
EBITDAHK$9.86BHK$9.44BHK$9.73BHK$8.58BHK$8.61B
Net incomeHK$794MHK$754MHK$673MHK$637MHK$679M
Free cash flowHK$4.84BHK$3.58B-HK$1.24BHK$795M-HK$339M
Capital expenditureHK$2.88BHK$3.00BHK$3.99BHK$4.59BHK$4.53B
Total debtn/aHK$38.0BHK$33.3BHK$32.8BHK$31.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sinopec Oilfield Service competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%-10%0%-10%-5%0%VALRIGHPNE601808SDRLODL1033.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sinopec Oilfield Service is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%10×20×30×VALRIGHPNE601808SDRLODL1033.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sinopec Oilfield Service is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%RIGHPNE601808SDRL1033.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Sinopec Oilfield Service is the large dot.

Sinopec Oilfield Service competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1033.HK vs HAL vs SLB vs 2883.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Sinopec Oilfield Service 1033.HK$4.72B-14%+3%2%13.8×12.0%
Halliburton HAL$26.3B-20%+2%13%11.7×-0.3%
Schlumberger SLB$73.7B-6%+5%14%17.2×7.3%
China Oilfield Services 2883.HK$7.31B-18%+7%12%6.7×-10.3%
Baker Hughes BKR$47.5B-25%+4%12%17.4×10.0%

How Sinopec Oilfield Service compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sinopec Oilfield Service against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1033.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.6%-5.0%highest of 8
6-month return-14.5%-15.6%4th highest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-65.4%-26.9%lowest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.3%+4.0%3rd lowest of 8
Operating margin2.3%11.3%lowest of 8
Forward P/E13.8×15.8×3rd cheapest of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)12.0%16.0%3rd least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.7%+11.7%lowest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+9.3 pp-0.9 pp2nd most demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.6 pp-4.5 pp3rd highest of 8
EV / EBITDA7.5×7.0×3rd most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA3.7×1.7×most indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Sinopec Oilfield Service 1033.HKHong Kong$4.72B-14%+3%2%13.8×12.0%+2.7%
Valaris VALUnited States$5.54B-16%-12%11%11.1×n/an/a
Transocean RIGUnited States$5.85B-18%+4%21%19.4×3.8%+4.7%
Helmerich & Payne HPUnited States$3.52B-7%+17%3%26.3×19.9%+16.1%
Noble NEUnited States$6.53B-18%-13%11%36.8×19.0%+27.8%
China Oilfield Services 601808.SSChina$7.30B-16%+3%12%14.1×-16.5%+11.7%
Seadrill SDRLUnited States$2.63B-13%+17%10%15.8×16.0%+6.3%
Odfjell Drilling ODL.OLNorway$2.57B+4%+11%23%10.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Sinopec Oilfield Service's main competitors?
Named competitors: Halliburton (HAL), SLB (SLB), China Oilfield Services (2883.HK), Baker Hughes (BKR). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Valaris (VAL), Transocean (RIG), Helmerich & Payne (HP), Noble (NE), China Oilfield Services (601808.SS), Seadrill (SDRL).
Is Sinopec Oilfield Service expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.8× against a peer median of 15.8×, 3rd cheapest of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Sinopec Oilfield Service stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -14.5% against -15.6% for the median peer; over one year -18.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.