Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2883.HK China Oilfield Services Limited Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

China Oilfield Services Limited Class H2883.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Energy›Contract Drilling

Offshore oilfield services company providing drilling, well services and geophysical surveys, majority owned by CNOOC.

≈ A Chinese Transocean/Halliburton for offshore servicesMomentum strong 64
Mkt cap
$7.31B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$12.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
6.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.5 pp
WACC 5.3%
Hurdle
-21 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
139 days
25 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$7.10
1D-0.4%
1W-8.6%
1M-3.3%
3M+3.4%
6M-17.7%
YTD+1.6%
1Y+0.1%
ATR %4.1%
52w lowhigh39.5% off high

What China Oilfield Services does

Offshore oilfield services company providing drilling, well services and geophysical surveys, majority owned by CNOOC.

The Hong Kong line of the company that trades in Shanghai as 601808. It charges daily rates for rigs and vessels and per-job fees for well and survey work, with a large share of the work for its parent CNOOC, so activity follows CNOOC's offshore spending. It also serves other operators abroad.

In one line: A Chinese Transocean/Halliburton for offshore services.

Products and services

  • Offshore drilling services
  • Well services (logging, cementing)
  • Marine/geophysical support services

Customers

  • CNOOC
  • International oil & gas operators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy
  • Oilfield services
  • Offshore drilling, well services…

What could go right

  • Offshore oil & gas capex cycle

What could go wrong

  • Oil price cyclicality
  • Customer concentration in CNOOC

Moat: narrow (installed base, customer qualification, distribution). Captive relationship with parent CNOOC and a large offshore rig fleet support steady utilization.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Founded: 1993 · Employees: 15,533

Named competitors

China Oilfield Services at a glance

Size China Oilfield Services (2883.HK) is a Hong Kong Energy company (Contract Drilling) with a market value of $7.31B, the 207th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$7.10 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 17.7%, against -14.5% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.0%); the operating margin is 12.5% (peer median 11.0%).

Valuation It trades at 6.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.8× (cheapest of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -21 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.5 points above its cost of capital (5.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 842883.HK 84
Six months, rebased to 100: China Oilfield Services against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

China Oilfield Services financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$56.5BHK$54.5BHK$52.3BHK$48.7BHK$41.4B
Revenue growth—+4%+7%+18%—
Gross profitHK$11.6BHK$11.0BHK$9.37BHK$8.96BHK$6.17B
EBITDAHK$15.0BHK$14.0BHK$12.0BHK$11.5BHK$8.99B
Net incomeHK$4.35BHK$4.17BHK$3.40BHK$3.33BHK$2.74B
Free cash flown/aHK$5.43BHK$4.81BHK$3.21BHK$2.57B
Capital expendituren/aHK$6.35BHK$6.54BHK$10.5BHK$4.82B
Total debtn/aHK$18.8BHK$19.1BHK$23.8BHK$25.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

China Oilfield Services competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%-10%0%-10%-5%0%NERIGVAL1033HPSDRLODL2883.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. China Oilfield Services is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%10×20×30×NERIGVAL1033HPSDRLODL2883.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. China Oilfield Services is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%NERIG1033HPSDRL2883.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. China Oilfield Services is the large dot.

China Oilfield Services competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (2883.HK vs RIG vs HAL vs SLB)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
China Oilfield Services 2883.HK$7.31B-18%+7%12%6.7×-10.3%
Transocean RIG$5.85B-18%+4%21%19.4×3.8%
Halliburton HAL$26.3B-20%+2%13%11.7×-0.3%
Schlumberger SLB$73.7B-6%+5%14%17.2×7.3%

How China Oilfield Services compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

China Oilfield Services against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2883.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.3%-5.0%4th highest of 8
6-month return-17.7%-14.5%3rd lowest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-39.5%-26.9%2nd lowest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.8%+4.0%4th highest of 8
Operating margin12.5%11.0%3rd highest of 8
Forward P/E6.7×15.8×cheapest of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-10.3%16.0%least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.9%+6.3%3rd highest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-21.2 pp+3.7 ppleast demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.5 pp-4.5 pphighest of 8
EV / EBITDA4.6×7.1×cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA0.7×1.9×2nd least indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
China Oilfield Services 2883.HKHong Kong$7.31B-18%+7%12%6.7×-10.3%+10.9%
Noble NEUnited States$6.53B-18%-13%11%36.8×19.0%+27.8%
Transocean RIGUnited States$5.85B-18%+4%21%19.4×3.8%+4.7%
Valaris VALUnited States$5.54B-16%-12%11%11.1×n/an/a
Sinopec Oilfield Service 1033.HKHong Kong$4.72B-14%+3%2%13.8×12.0%+2.7%
Helmerich & Payne HPUnited States$3.52B-7%+17%3%26.3×19.9%+16.1%
Seadrill SDRLUnited States$2.63B-13%+17%10%15.8×16.0%+6.3%
Odfjell Drilling ODL.OLNorway$2.57B+4%+11%23%10.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are China Oilfield Services's main competitors?
Named competitors: Transocean (RIG), Halliburton (HAL), SLB (SLB). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Noble (NE), Transocean (RIG), Valaris (VAL), Sinopec Oilfield Service (1033.HK), Helmerich & Payne (HP), Seadrill (SDRL).
Is China Oilfield Services expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 6.7× against a peer median of 15.8×, cheapest of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -21 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has China Oilfield Services stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -17.7% against -14.5% for the median peer; over one year +0.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.