Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › WFRD Weatherford International plcOpen in the cockpit ↗

Weatherford International plcWFRDCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Oilfield Services/Equipment

Global oilfield services company providing drilling, well construction, completion and production/intervention services.

Momentum neutral 41
Mkt cap
$6.12B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$101M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+13.1 pp
WACC 8.3%
Hurdle
-10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
95 days
9 Feb 2027
Close · USD$84.43
1D+2.6%
1W-6.8%
1M+9.8%
3M-9.1%
6M-17.5%
YTD+7.9%
1Y+15.9%
ATR %4.3%
Beta1.12
52w lowhigh25.4% off high

What Weatherford International does

Global oilfield services company providing drilling, well construction, completion and production/intervention services.

Charges for oilfield services and rented tools, by the job or by the day, with most business outside North America. It emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2019 and has since cut debt and costs.

Products and services

  • Drilling services/tubular running
  • Well construction & completions
  • Production & intervention
  • Digital solutions

Customers

  • International and North American oil & gas operato

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Oilfield services
  • Drilling, completion & production…
  • International/North American well…

What could go right

  • International drilling activity recovery
  • Cost discipline post-restructuring boosts margins

What could go wrong

  • Oil price-driven capex cyclicality
  • Legacy balance sheet/restructuring overhang

Moat: narrow (installed base, process know-how). Long operating history and specialized equipment support recurring service contracts, post-restructuring balance sheet now leaner.

Headquarters: Houston, Texas, US · Founded: 1941 · Employees: 16,700

Named competitors

Weatherford International at a glance

Size Weatherford International (WFRD) is a United States Energy company (Oilfield Services/Equipment) with a market value of $6.12B, the 1049th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $84.43 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 17.5%, against -12.4% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 15 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 5.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.3%); the operating margin is 14.2% (peer median 19.0%).

Valuation It trades at 13.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.8× (5th cheapest of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 13.1 points above its cost of capital (8.3% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 5.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 84WFRD 83
Six months, rebased to 100: Weatherford International against the median of its 14 peers (local-currency closes).

Weatherford International financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$4.69B$4.92B$5.51B$5.13B$4.33B
Revenue growth—-11%+7%+19%—
Gross profit$1.38B$1.48B$1.75B$1.74B$1.31B
EBITDA$951M$1.03B$1.34B$1.15B$788M
Net income$405M$431M$506M$417M$26.0M
Free cash flow$579M$450M$493M$623M$217M
Capital expenditure$192M$226M$299M$209M$132M
Total debt$1.63B$1.64B$1.79B$2.06B$2.41B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Weatherford International competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%SBMONOVAROCWHDSEIKGSSUBCUSAC002353WBINESRLBRTFLOCWFRD6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Weatherford International is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%10×20×30×40×SBMONOVAROCWHDSEIKGSSUBCUSAC002353WBINESRWFRDRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Weatherford International is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%75%SBMONOVAROCWHDKGSSUBCUSAC002353FLOCINVXWFRDGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Weatherford International is the large dot.

Weatherford International competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (WFRD vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Weatherford International WFRD$6.12B-17%-6%14%13.4×-4.0%
Schlumberger SLB$73.7B-6%+5%14%17.2×7.3%
Halliburton HAL$26.3B-20%+2%13%11.7×-0.3%
Baker Hughes BKR$47.5B-25%+4%12%17.4×10.0%
NOV NOV$6.26B-9%-1%6%14.8×6.8%

How Weatherford International compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Weatherford International against its 14 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureWFRDPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+9.8%-9.1%highest of 15
6-month return-17.5%-12.4%7th lowest of 15
Distance from 52-week high-25.4%-30.9%6th highest of 15
Revenue growth (TTM)-5.7%+13.3%lowest of 15
Operating margin14.2%19.0%6th lowest of 15
Forward P/E13.4×14.8×5th cheapest of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-4.0%5.7%2nd least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.9%+14.5%lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-9.9 pp-10.4 pp6th most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+13.1 pp+0.5 pphighest of 15
EV / EBITDA6.9×8.3×3rd cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA0.5×2.7×5th least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Weatherford International WFRDUnited States$6.12B-17%-6%14%13.4×-4.0%+5.9%
SBM Offshore SBMO.ASNetherlands$6.08B-8%+1%31%6.2×-14.4%+11.3%
NOV NOVUnited States$6.26B-9%-1%6%14.8×6.8%+7.6%
Archrock AROCUnited States$4.83B-25%+4%39%13.8×2.8%+11.2%
Cactus WHDUnited States$4.67B+7%+40%19%16.8×14.1%+25.4%
Solaris Energy Infrastructure SEIUnited States$4.63B-21%+71%24%16.8×n/an/a
Kodiak Gas Services KGSUnited States$4.21B-40%+8%33%17.0×9.3%+19.7%
Subsea 7 SUBC.OLNorway$9.71B-5%-2%13%12.4×-2.4%+17.7%
USA Compression Partners LP USACUnited States$3.62B-11%+29%29%15.6×-0.4%+8.4%
Yantai Jereh Oilfield Services 002353.SZChina$12.2B-42%+13%19%24.1×14.8%+14.5%
Waterbridge Infrastructure LLC WBIUnited States$3.06B-9%+103%17%40.2×n/an/a
National Energy Services Reunited NESRUnited States$2.01B-14%+24%9%9.9×1.2%+9.7%
Liberty Energy LBRTUnited States$1.95B-64%+14%2%n/an/an/a
Flowco FLOCUnited States$1.81B-19%+20%19%13.1×8.0%+72.3%
Innovex International INVXUnited States$1.76B-6%+7%12%14.7×5.7%+21.8%

Questions

Who are Weatherford International's main competitors?
Named competitors: SLB (Schlumberger) (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), Baker Hughes (BKR), NOV Inc. (NOV). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes SBM Offshore (SBMO.AS), NOV (NOV), Archrock (AROC), Cactus (WHD), Solaris Energy Infrastructure (SEI), Kodiak Gas Services (KGS).
Is Weatherford International expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.4× against a peer median of 14.8×, 5th cheapest of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Weatherford International stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -17.5% against -12.4% for the median peer; over one year +15.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.