Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SUBC.OL Subsea 7 S.A.Open in the cockpit ↗

Subsea 7 S.A.SUBC.OLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Norway · NOK·Energy›Oilfield Services/Equipment

Global offshore contractor installing subsea pipelines, umbilicals and structures for oil, gas and offshore wind projects.

≈ No direct US peer; comparable to TechnipFMC's subsea armMomentum weak 24
Mkt cap
$9.71B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
75%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$10.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+7.9 pp
WACC 10.7%
Hurdle
-20 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
13 days
19 Nov 2026
Close · NOKNOK 304.80
1D-2.0%
1W-6.2%
1M-5.8%
3M-9.1%
6M-5.2%
YTD+50.0%
1Y+65.2%
ATR %3.3%
52w lowhigh14.9% off high

What Subsea 7 does

Global offshore contractor installing subsea pipelines, umbilicals and structures for oil, gas and offshore wind projects.

Wins projects through tenders from oil companies and offshore wind developers, mostly under fixed-price contracts, and books revenue as vessels and fabrication yards deliver, so margins hinge on execution and weather. It owns the specialized installation ships and fabrication yards itself instead of renting them.

In one line: No direct US peer; comparable to TechnipFMC's subsea arm.

Products and services

  • Subsea umbilicals/risers/flowlines (SURF)
  • Life-of-field/subsea services
  • Offshore wind installation

Customers

  • Oil majors/national oil companies
  • Offshore wind developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy
  • Oilfield services/equipment
  • Subsea engineering, construction…

What could go right

  • Offshore oil & gas project sanctioning
  • Offshore wind installation contracts

What could go wrong

  • Offshore capex cyclicality
  • Vessel utilization/day-rate volatility

Moat: narrow (installed base, process know-how, scale). Specialized vessel fleet and deepwater installation expertise are capital-intensive to replicate.

Headquarters: Luxembourg City, Luxembourg · Founded: 1993 · Employees: 13,821

Named competitors

Subsea 7 at a glance

Size Subsea 7 (SUBC.OL) is a Norway Energy company (Oilfield Services/Equipment) with a market value of $9.71B, the 12th largest of 115 Norway companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NOK 304.80 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 5.2%, against -14.4% for the median peer and +2.7% for the Norway market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 13 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 1.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.1%); the operating margin is 13.5% (peer median 19.3%).

Valuation It trades at 12.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.2× (3rd cheapest of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +18%, so the hurdle is -20 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.9 points above its cost of capital (10.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 19 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026SUBC.OL 92Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Subsea 7 against the median of its 12 peers (local-currency closes).

Subsea 7 financials

Reported figures in NOK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNOK 74.0BNOK 73.6BNOK 73.5BNOK 63.1BNOK 49.4B
Revenue growth—0%+16%+28%—
Gross profitNOK 13.4BNOK 11.0BNOK 7.36BNOK 4.40BNOK 2.89B
EBITDANOK 16.6BNOK 15.0BNOK 11.3BNOK 7.68BNOK 5.42B
Net incomeNOK 5.98BNOK 4.27BNOK 2.17BNOK 163MNOK 549M
Free cash flowNOK 16.6BNOK 12.3BNOK 5.75BNOK 542MNOK 2.49B
Capital expenditureNOK 2.48BNOK 2.92BNOK 3.75BNOK 6.15BNOK 2.22B
Total debtNOK 8.47BNOK 9.42BNOK 13.4BNOK 13.2BNOK 6.04B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Subsea 7 competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%002353NOVWFRDSBMOAROCWHDSEIKGSFTIUSACHALWBISUBC.OL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Subsea 7 is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%10×20×30×40×002353NOVWFRDSBMOAROCWHDSEIKGSUSACHALWBISUBC.OLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Subsea 7 is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%002353NOVWFRDSBMOAROCWHDKGSFTISUBC.OLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Subsea 7 is the large dot.

Subsea 7 competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SUBC.OL vs FTI vs SPM.MI vs AKSO.OL)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Subsea 7 SUBC.OL$9.71B-5%-2%13%12.4×-2.4%
TechnipFMC FTI$24.7B-9%+8%16%17.4×3.7%
Saipem SPM.MI$9.38B-9%+2%4%27.1×6.9%
Aker Solutions AKSO.OL$1.89B-17%-9%5%5.8×-14.7%
Oceaneering International OII$3.40B-6%+3%10%17.2×3.3%
Seatrium 5E2.SI$4.77B-19%+11%4%13.0×4.0%

How Subsea 7 compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Subsea 7 against its 12 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSUBC.OLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.8%-8.9%4th highest of 13
6-month return-5.2%-14.4%2nd highest of 13
Distance from 52-week high-14.9%-26.2%2nd highest of 13
Revenue growth (TTM)-1.7%+8.1%2nd lowest of 13
Operating margin13.5%19.3%3rd lowest of 13
Forward P/E12.4×16.2×3rd cheapest of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-2.4%3.3%3rd least demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+17.7%+10.1%3rd highest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-20.0 pp-9.0 pp2nd least demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+7.9 pp+3.2 pp3rd highest of 13
EV / EBITDA5.3×9.3×cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-0.1×2.7×2nd least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Subsea 7 SUBC.OLNorway$9.71B-5%-2%13%12.4×-2.4%+17.7%
Yantai Jereh Oilfield Services 002353.SZChina$12.2B-42%+13%19%24.1×14.8%+14.5%
NOV NOVUnited States$6.26B-9%-1%6%14.8×6.8%+7.6%
Weatherford International WFRDUnited States$6.12B-17%-6%14%13.4×-4.0%+5.9%
SBM Offshore SBMO.ASNetherlands$6.08B-8%+1%31%6.2×-14.4%+11.3%
Archrock AROCUnited States$4.83B-25%+4%39%13.8×2.8%+11.2%
Cactus WHDUnited States$4.67B+7%+40%19%16.8×14.1%+25.4%
Solaris Energy Infrastructure SEIUnited States$4.63B-21%+71%24%16.8×n/an/a
Kodiak Gas Services KGSUnited States$4.21B-40%+8%33%17.0×9.3%+19.7%
TechnipFMC FTIUnited States$24.7B-9%+8%16%17.4×3.7%+8.5%
USA Compression Partners LP USACUnited States$3.62B-11%+29%29%15.6×-0.4%+8.4%
Halliburton HALUnited States$26.3B-20%+2%13%11.7×-0.3%+9.0%
Waterbridge Infrastructure LLC WBIUnited States$3.06B-9%+103%17%40.2×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Subsea 7's main competitors?
Named competitors: TechnipFMC (FTI), Saipem (SPM.MI), McDermott International (private) (private or unlisted), Aker Solutions (AKSO.OL), Oceaneering International (OII), Seatrium (5E2.SI). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Yantai Jereh Oilfield Services (002353.SZ), NOV (NOV), Weatherford International (WFRD), SBM Offshore (SBMO.AS), Archrock (AROC), Cactus (WHD).
Is Subsea 7 expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.4× against a peer median of 16.2×, 3rd cheapest of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +18%, so the hurdle is -20 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Subsea 7 stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -5.2% against -14.4% for the median peer; over one year +65.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.