Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SPM.MI Saipem S.p.A.Open in the cockpit ↗

Saipem S.p.A.SPM.MICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Italy · EUR·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Italian oilfield services company providing offshore/onshore engineering, drilling and construction for energy projects.

Momentum weak 32
Mkt cap
$9.38B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
64%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$78.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
27.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.1 pp
WACC 10.9%
Hurdle
-9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
116 days
2 Mar 2027
Close · EUR€4.24
1D-0.5%
1W-5.5%
1M-3.8%
3M-4.4%
6M-9.0%
YTD+74.7%
1Y+92.5%
ATR %3.2%
52w lowhigh12.6% off high

What Saipem does

Italian oilfield services company providing offshore/onshore engineering, drilling and construction for energy projects.

Wins large engineering and construction contracts, booking revenue as work progresses, so the order backlog and project execution drive results more than the oil price day to day; clients' capital spending decides how much work is on offer. Eni, the Italian energy group, is its largest shareholder and a regular customer.

Products and services

  • Offshore engineering & construction
  • Onshore EPC (pipelines, plants)
  • Drilling services

Customers

  • Oil & gas majors, national oil companies, offshore

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Oilfield services
  • Offshore/onshore EPC & drilling…

What could go right

  • Offshore oil & gas capex recovery
  • Offshore wind construction demand

What could go wrong

  • Lumpy, large-project order intake
  • Oil & gas capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (installed base, process know-how). Specialized offshore construction vessels and engineering expertise limit qualified competitors.

Headquarters: San Donato Milanese, Italy · Founded: 1957 · Employees: 30,409

Named competitors

Saipem at a glance

Size Saipem (SPM.MI) is an Italy Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $9.38B, the 26th largest of 123 Italy companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €4.24 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.0%, against -15.3% for the median peer and +3.1% for the Italy market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.9%); the operating margin is 4.0% (peer median 6.4%).

Valuation It trades at 27.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 10.4× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.1 points above its cost of capital (10.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026SPM.MI 91Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Saipem against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Saipem financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€15.6B€15.5B€14.5B€11.9B€9.98B
Revenue growth—+7%+23%+19%—
Gross profit€1.76B€1.88B€1.71B€1.35B€715M
EBITDA€1.73B€1.71B€1.33B€916M€532M
Net income€266M€310M€306M€179M-€209M
Free cash flow€1.21B€1.16B€735M€114M-€990M
Capital expenditure€310M€364M€337M€482M€523M
Total debtn/a€3.11B€3.02B€3.12B€3.03B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Saipem competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%+20%ATRL028050ACMTTEKSTNJSWINFRA18031801600039STRL6011861618601669FGRSKA-B18121800TE601117ANASPM.MI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Saipem is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%10×20×ATRL028050ACMTTEKSTNJSWINFRA18031801600039STRL6011861618601669SKA-B18121800TE601117ANASPM.MIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Saipem is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%ATRL028050ACMTTEKSTN18016000391618FGRTE601117ANASPM.MIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Saipem is the large dot.

Saipem competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SPM.MI vs FTI vs SUBC.OL vs TE.PA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Saipem SPM.MI$9.38B-9%+2%4%27.1×6.9%
TechnipFMC FTI$24.7B-9%+8%16%17.4×3.7%
Subsea 7 SUBC.OL$9.71B-5%-2%13%12.4×-2.4%
Technip Energies TE.PA$6.83B-8%+2%4%18.9×-6.5%

How Saipem compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Saipem against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSPM.MIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.8%+2.6%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-9.0%-15.3%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-12.6%-29.2%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.9%+2.9%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin4.0%6.4%5th lowest of 21
Forward P/E27.1×10.4×2nd most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)6.9%3.9%7th most demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+16.1%+9.6%2nd highest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-9.2 pp-7.5 pp7th least demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.1 pp+2.7 pp5th highest of 19
EV / EBITDA5.2×9.5×cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA0.4×1.1×4th least indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Saipem SPM.MIItaly$9.38B-9%+2%4%27.1×6.9%+16.1%
Atkinsrealis ATRL.TOCanada$9.94B-7%+15%7%19.9×11.4%+9.6%
SamsungE&A 028050.KSSouth Korea$8.73B+14%+19%11%13.6×-2.1%+6.1%
Aecom ACMUnited States$8.59B-17%-4%5%11.0×7.3%+4.0%
Tetra Tech TTEKUnited States$10.3B+33%-8%12%24.0×8.3%+12.7%
Stantec STN.TOCanada$8.42B-16%+10%10%16.0×3.9%+11.5%
JSW Infrastructure JSWINFRA.NSIndia$8.33B+20%+17%36%46.8×n/an/a
Shimizu 1803.TJapan$8.30B-35%+6%6%7.8×n/an/a
Taisei 1801.TJapan$10.8B-38%+2%9%9.9×0.6%+7.1%
Sichuan Road & Bridge 600039.SSChina$11.4B+8%+8%10%9.7×-5.0%+12.3%
Sterling Infrastructure STRLUnited States$7.71B-70%+93%19%9.4×8.8%+11.8%
China Railway Construction 601186.SSChina$11.4B-11%-9%4%4.9×n/an/a
Metallurgical Corporation of China 1618.HKHong Kong$7.67B-14%-18%-4%5.1×5.2%+1.9%
Power Construction Corporation of China 601669.SSChina$11.5B-20%-2%4%8.4×n/an/a
Eiffage FGR.PAFrance$11.5B-20%+5%10%9.3×-6.9%+9.4%
Skanska SKA-B.STSweden$12.1B+16%-6%4%17.1×8.3%+2.0%
Kajima 1812.TJapan$12.5B-27%+4%8%10.8×-1.9%+10.0%
China Communications Construction 1800.HKHong Kong$12.8B-26%-5%4%3.1×n/an/a
Technip Energies TE.PAFrance$6.83B-8%+2%4%18.9×-6.5%+4.6%
China National Chemical Engineering 601117.SSChina$6.68B-15%+2%5%6.4×-17.3%+11.6%
Acciona ANA.MCSpain$13.4B-16%+8%6%19.8×8.2%+25.6%

Questions

Who are Saipem's main competitors?
Named competitors: TechnipFMC (FTI), Subsea7 (SUBC.OL), Technip Energies (TE.PA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Atkinsrealis (ATRL.TO), SamsungE&A (028050.KS), Aecom (ACM), Tetra Tech (TTEK), Stantec (STN.TO), JSW Infrastructure (JSWINFRA.NS).
Is Saipem expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 27.1× against a peer median of 10.4×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Saipem stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.0% against -15.3% for the median peer; over one year +92.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.