Loading…

AecomACMCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Global engineering, design and construction-management consulting firm for infrastructure, transportation and environmental projects.

Momentum neutral 43
Mkt cap
$8.59B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$71.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.2 pp
WACC 8.3%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BB / BB+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
10 days
16 Nov 2026
Close · USD$66.74
1D0.0%
1W+5.4%
1M+12.2%
3M-8.9%
6M-17.2%
YTD-30.0%
1Y-49.5%
ATR %3.0%
Beta0.83
52w lowhigh50.8% off high

What Aecom does

Global engineering, design and construction-management consulting firm for infrastructure, transportation and environmental projects.

Gets paid fees for engineering, design and project-management work on large public programmes, usually under multi-year framework contracts, with US infrastructure agencies the largest source. Some work is cost-reimbursable. It has been reducing construction and government-services exposure to focus on design and management.

Products and services

  • Transportation infrastructure design
  • Environmental/water engineering
  • Program/construction management

Customers

  • Governments
  • Transportation authorities
  • Infrastructure developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Engineering & construction
  • Infrastructure engineering & program…

What could go right

  • Global infrastructure investment (transportation, water)
  • Data-center/advanced-manufacturing design work

What could go wrong

  • Government budget delays
  • Project cost overrun/execution risk

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base, brand). Long track record on large public infrastructure programs and deep government relationships.

Headquarters: Dallas, Texas, US · Founded: 1990 · Employees: 51,000

Named competitors

Aecom at a glance

Size Aecom (ACM) is a United States Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $8.59B, the 855th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $66.74 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 17.2%, against -10.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 4.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.7%); the operating margin is 4.7% (peer median 7.3%).

Valuation It trades at 11.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.3× (10th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.2 points above its cost of capital (8.3% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $20.4B at 30 Jun 2026, up 14% on a year earlier — 1.3 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Aecom has 1 bond outstanding ($1.20B), rated BB by the agencies and trading like BB+ at a weighted spread of 165 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 4.8% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 90ACM 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Aecom against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Aecom financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-09-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$15.4B$16.1B$16.1B$14.4B$13.1B
Revenue growth—0%+12%+9%—
Gross profit$874M$1.24B$1.12B$986M$892M
EBITDA$930M$1.23B$1.10B$963M$867M
Net income$361M$562M$402M$55.3M$311M
Free cash flow$203M$685M$708M$590M$577M
Capital expenditure$162M$137M$120M$106M$137M
Total debt$3.33B$3.36B$3.16B$2.89B$2.95B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Aecom competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%028050STNJSWINFRA1803SPMSTRL1618ATRLTTEKTE1801601117600039601669FGRIESCDYFLRSKA-BACM6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Aecom is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%10×20×028050STNJSWINFRA1803SPMSTRL1618ATRLTTEKTE1801601117600039601186601669IESCDYFLRSKA-BACMRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Aecom is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%028050STNSPMSTRL1618ATRLTE1801601117600039FGRIESCSKA-BACMGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Aecom is the large dot.

Aecom competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ACM vs J vs STN.TO vs WSP.TO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Aecom ACM$8.59B-17%-4%5%11.0×7.3%
Jacobs Solutions J$17.4B+26%+20%5%18.6×15.8%
Stantec STN.TO$8.42B-16%+10%10%16.0×3.9%
WSP Global WSP.TO$17.5B-19%+10%10%14.4×0.0%
Atkinsrealis ATRL.TO$9.94B-7%+15%7%19.9×11.4%
Tetra Tech TTEK$10.3B+33%-8%12%24.0×8.3%
Parsons PSN$5.16B-1%-3%5%14.8×8.4%
Fluor FLR$6.22B+7%-5%-2%14.2×n/a
Arcadis ARCAD.AS$4.42B+31%-1%6%15.0×5.5%

How Aecom compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Aecom against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureACMPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+12.2%+0.7%4th highest of 21
6-month return-17.2%-10.1%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-50.8%-23.5%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-4.2%+3.7%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin4.7%7.3%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E11.0×12.3×10th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)7.3%5.2%7th most demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.0%+11.5%3rd lowest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.3 pp-7.5 pp3rd most demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.2 pp+2.2 pp10th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA11.9×9.6×4th most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA2.5×0.4×3rd most indebted of 14
Bond spread165 bp104 bp2nd widest of 4

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Aecom ACMUnited States$8.59B-17%-4%5%11.0×7.3%+4.0%
SamsungE&A 028050.KSSouth Korea$8.73B+14%+19%11%13.6×-2.1%+6.1%
Stantec STN.TOCanada$8.42B-16%+10%10%16.0×3.9%+11.5%
JSW Infrastructure JSWINFRA.NSIndia$8.33B+20%+17%36%46.8×n/an/a
Shimizu 1803.TJapan$8.30B-35%+6%6%7.8×n/an/a
Saipem SPM.MIItaly$9.38B-9%+2%4%27.1×6.9%+16.1%
Sterling Infrastructure STRLUnited States$7.71B-70%+93%19%9.4×8.8%+11.8%
Metallurgical Corporation of China 1618.HKHong Kong$7.67B-14%-18%-4%5.1×5.2%+1.9%
Atkinsrealis ATRL.TOCanada$9.94B-7%+15%7%19.9×11.4%+9.6%
Tetra Tech TTEKUnited States$10.3B+33%-8%12%24.0×8.3%+12.7%
Technip Energies TE.PAFrance$6.83B-8%+2%4%18.9×-6.5%+4.6%
Taisei 1801.TJapan$10.8B-38%+2%9%9.9×0.6%+7.1%
China National Chemical Engineering 601117.SSChina$6.68B-15%+2%5%6.4×-17.3%+11.6%
Sichuan Road & Bridge 600039.SSChina$11.4B+8%+8%10%9.7×-5.0%+12.3%
China Railway Construction 601186.SSChina$11.4B-11%-9%4%4.9×n/an/a
Power Construction Corporation of China 601669.SSChina$11.5B-20%-2%4%8.4×n/an/a
Eiffage FGR.PAFrance$11.5B-20%+5%10%9.3×-6.9%+9.4%
IES IESCUnited States$6.38B+32%+23%12%12.6×11.2%+22.9%
Dycom Industries DYUnited States$6.26B-52%+38%8%12.1×11.6%+11.6%
Fluor FLRUnited States$6.22B+7%-5%-2%14.2×n/an/a
Skanska SKA-B.STSweden$12.1B+16%-6%4%17.1×8.3%+2.0%

Aecom bonds and credit

Aecom has 1 bond outstanding with $1.20B face value. The agencies rate it BB; its bonds trade like BB+. Weighted yield 6.41%, a spread of 165 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Aecom backlog

Aecom reported $20.4B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Jun 2026, up 14% from a year earlier and up 1% from the previous quarter. That is 1.3 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.08.

Questions

Who are Aecom's main competitors?
Named competitors: Jacobs Solutions (J), Stantec (STN.TO), WSP Global (WSP.TO), AtkinsRealis (ATRL.TO), Tetra Tech (TTEK), Parsons (PSN). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes SamsungE&A (028050.KS), Stantec (STN.TO), JSW Infrastructure (JSWINFRA.NS), Shimizu (1803.T), Saipem (SPM.MI), Sterling Infrastructure (STRL).
Is Aecom expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.0× against a peer median of 12.3×, 10th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Aecom stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -17.2% against -10.1% for the median peer; over one year -49.5%.
What is Aecom's backlog?
Aecom's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $20.4B at 30 Jun 2026, +14% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.