Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600039.SS Sichuan Road & Bridge Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Sichuan Road & Bridge Co., Ltd. Class A600039.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Regional highway, bridge and tunnel contractor for Sichuan province, with side investments in mining and new materials.

Momentum leader 86
Mkt cap
$11.4B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
23%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$29.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.4 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
174 days
29 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥8.83
1D+2.6%
1W+4.4%
1M-0.7%
3M+0.1%
6M+7.8%
YTD-11.3%
1Y+0.1%
ATR %3.2%
52w lowhigh17.1% off high

What Sichuan Road & Bridge does

Regional highway, bridge and tunnel contractor for Sichuan province, with side investments in mining and new materials.

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Construction & engineering
  • Regional infrastructure EPC
  • Highway, bridge and tunnel construction

Moat: none

Headquarters: Chengdu, China · Employees: 15,360

Named competitors

Sichuan Road & Bridge at a glance

Size Sichuan Road & Bridge (600039.SS) is a China Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $11.4B, the 220th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥8.83 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 7.8%, against -17.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 7.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.8%); the operating margin is 10.0% (peer median 6.0%).

Valuation It trades at 9.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.3× (8th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.4 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026600039.SS 110Peer median 83
Six months, rebased to 100: Sichuan Road & Bridge against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Sichuan Road & Bridge financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥117BCN¥115BCN¥107BCN¥115BCN¥135B
Revenue growth—+7%-7%-15%—
Gross profitCN¥18.5BCN¥16.4BCN¥16.6BCN¥20.4BCN¥22.4B
EBITDAn/aCN¥13.6BCN¥13.5BCN¥15.5BCN¥17.3B
Net incomeCN¥7.34BCN¥7.30BCN¥7.21BCN¥9.00BCN¥11.2B
Free cash flowCN¥3.09BCN¥6.62B-CN¥4.03B-CN¥9.83BCN¥8.08B
Capital expenditureCN¥864MCN¥1.14BCN¥7.56BCN¥7.75BCN¥5.33B
Total debtCN¥78.6BCN¥78.2BCN¥72.8BCN¥79.2BCN¥64.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sichuan Road & Bridge competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%601186601669FGR1801SKA-B1812TTEK1800ATRLANA601868SPMMTZ028050ACMSTNJSWINFRA1803STRL600039.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sichuan Road & Bridge is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%10×20×601186601669FGR1801SKA-BTTEK1800ATRLANA601868SPMMTZ0280500390ACMSTNJSWINFRA1803STRL600039.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sichuan Road & Bridge is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%0%10%20%FGR1801SKA-B1812TTEKATRLANASPMMTZ028050ACMSTNSTRL600039.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Sichuan Road & Bridge is the large dot.

Sichuan Road & Bridge competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (600039.SS vs 601186.SS vs 601800.SS vs 601390.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Sichuan Road & Bridge 600039.SS$11.4B+8%+8%10%9.7×-5.0%
China Railway Construction 601186.SS$11.4B-11%-9%4%4.9×n/a
China Communications Construction 601800.SS$12.8B-12%-4%3%6.8×n/a
China Railway 601390.SS$15.1B-13%-7%4%6.0×n/a

How Sichuan Road & Bridge compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sichuan Road & Bridge against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600039.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-0.7%-1.7%9th highest of 21
6-month return+7.8%-17.6%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-17.1%-35.6%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+7.8%+2.8%7th highest of 21
Operating margin10.0%6.0%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E9.7×12.3×8th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-5.0%7.3%2nd least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+12.3%+10.0%5th highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-17.3 pp-6.5 pp2nd least demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.4 pp+1.3 pp7th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Sichuan Road & Bridge 600039.SSChina$11.4B+8%+8%10%9.7×-5.0%+12.3%
China Railway Construction 601186.SSChina$11.4B-11%-9%4%4.9×n/an/a
Power Construction Corporation of China 601669.SSChina$11.5B-20%-2%4%8.4×n/an/a
Eiffage FGR.PAFrance$11.5B-20%+5%10%9.3×-6.9%+9.4%
Taisei 1801.TJapan$10.8B-38%+2%9%9.9×0.6%+7.1%
Skanska SKA-B.STSweden$12.1B+16%-6%4%17.1×8.3%+2.0%
Kajima 1812.TJapan$12.5B-27%+4%8%10.8×-1.9%+10.0%
Tetra Tech TTEKUnited States$10.3B+33%-8%12%24.0×8.3%+12.7%
China Communications Construction 1800.HKHong Kong$12.8B-26%-5%4%3.1×n/an/a
Atkinsrealis ATRL.TOCanada$9.94B-7%+15%7%19.9×11.4%+9.6%
Acciona ANA.MCSpain$13.4B-16%+8%6%19.8×8.2%+25.6%
China Energy Engineering 601868.SSChina$13.6B-18%-5%4%17.9×n/an/a
Saipem SPM.MIItaly$9.38B-9%+2%4%27.1×6.9%+16.1%
MasTec MTZUnited States$14.0B-58%+26%5%15.0×21.6%+17.7%
SamsungE&A 028050.KSSouth Korea$8.73B+14%+19%11%13.6×-2.1%+6.1%
China Railway 0390.HKHong Kong$15.0B-19%-4%4%3.6×n/an/a
Aecom ACMUnited States$8.59B-17%-4%5%11.0×7.3%+4.0%
Stantec STN.TOCanada$8.42B-16%+10%10%16.0×3.9%+11.5%
JSW Infrastructure JSWINFRA.NSIndia$8.33B+20%+17%36%46.8×n/an/a
Shimizu 1803.TJapan$8.30B-35%+6%6%7.8×n/an/a
Sterling Infrastructure STRLUnited States$7.71B-70%+93%19%9.4×8.8%+11.8%

Questions

Who are Sichuan Road & Bridge's main competitors?
Named competitors: China Railway Construction (601186.SS), China Communications Construction (601800.SS), China Railway Group (601390.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes China Railway Construction (601186.SS), Power Construction Corporation of China (601669.SS), Eiffage (FGR.PA), Taisei (1801.T), Skanska (SKA-B.ST), Kajima (1812.T).
Is Sichuan Road & Bridge expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.7× against a peer median of 12.3×, 8th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Sichuan Road & Bridge stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +7.8% against -17.6% for the median peer; over one year +0.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.