Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SKA-B.ST Skanska AB Class BOpen in the cockpit ↗

Skanska AB Class BSKA-B.STCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Sweden · SEK·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Swedish construction and project development group, building infrastructure, commercial and residential projects globally.

≈ A Swedish Turner Construction/AECOM hybridMomentum strong 69
Mkt cap
$12.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
83%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$21.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.0 pp
WACC 7.8%
Hurdle
+6 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
84 days
29 Jan 2027
Close · SEKSEK 288.50
1D+2.1%
1W+2.2%
1M+11.7%
3M+8.3%
6M+16.5%
YTD+14.3%
1Y+11.1%
ATR %1.9%
52w lowhigh0.8% off high

What Skanska does

Swedish construction and project development group, building infrastructure, commercial and residential projects globally.

Builds under contracts, mostly won by bidding or negotiated with public and corporate clients, and books revenue as work progresses. A separate development arm buys land, builds offices and homes, and sells them on, so profit from that side comes in lumps. Its main markets are the Nordics, the US and the UK.

In one line: A Swedish Turner Construction/AECOM hybrid.

Products and services

  • Building construction
  • Civil/infrastructure construction
  • Commercial property development
  • Residential development

Customers

  • Governments/public infrastructure agencies
  • Corporate real estate developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Engineering & construction
  • Building construction, civil…

What could go right

  • Infrastructure spending (roads, transit)
  • Commercial development project pipeline

What could go wrong

  • Construction project execution/margin risk
  • Interest rate sensitivity (development projects)

Moat: narrow (scale, process know-how). Large project execution track record across the Nordics, US and UK, in a low-margin, competitive industry.

Headquarters: Stockholm, Sweden · Founded: 1887 · Employees: 25,865

Named competitors

Skanska at a glance

Size Skanska (SKA-B.ST) is a Sweden Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $12.1B, the 26th largest of 221 Sweden companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at SEK 288.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 16.5%, against -17.6% for the median peer and +8.2% for the Sweden market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 5.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.6%); the operating margin is 3.9% (peer median 6.6%).

Valuation It trades at 17.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.0× (8th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +6 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.0 points above its cost of capital (7.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026SKA-B.ST 116Peer median 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Skanska against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Skanska financials

Reported figures in SEK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueSEK 174BSEK 177BSEK 176BSEK 167BSEK 163B
Revenue growth—0%+6%+2%—
Gross profitSEK 15.5BSEK 14.5BSEK 14.2BSEK 13.2BSEK 16.4B
EBITDASEK 11.7BSEK 9.06BSEK 8.47BSEK 6.95BSEK 10.3B
Net incomeSEK 6.63BSEK 5.70BSEK 5.55BSEK 5.00BSEK 8.26B
Free cash flown/aSEK 4.75BSEK 6.90BSEK 1.30B-SEK 1.13B
Capital expendituren/aSEK 3.17BSEK 2.68BSEK 2.60BSEK 2.26B
Total debtSEK 15.5BSEK 15.9BSEK 19.2BSEK 17.8BSEK 14.7B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Skanska competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%+20%1812FGR60166918001186600039ANA1801MTZTTEKATRL0390SPM028050ACMSTNWSPAPGJSWINFRASKA-B.ST6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Skanska is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%10×20×1812FGR60166918001186600039ANA1801601868MTZTTEKATRLSPM028050ACMSTNWSPAPGJSWINFRASKA-B.STRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Skanska is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%1812FGR600039ANA1801MTZTTEKATRLSPM028050ACMSTNWSPAPGSKA-B.STGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Skanska is the large dot.

Skanska competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SKA-B.ST vs DG.PA vs EN.PA vs NCC-A.ST)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Skanska SKA-B.ST$12.1B+16%-6%4%17.1×8.3%
Vinci DG.PA$69.8B-12%+4%12%12.2×-1.5%
Bouygues EN.PA$18.3B-18%-1%5%12.9×-0.8%
NCC NCC-A.ST$1.69B-3%-17%3%22.2×-1.6%

How Skanska compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Skanska against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSKA-B.STPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+11.7%-0.8%5th highest of 21
6-month return+16.5%-17.6%3rd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-0.8%-30.9%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-5.7%+4.6%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin3.9%6.6%4th lowest of 21
Forward P/E17.1×14.0×8th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.3%5.4%4th most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.0%+11.9%lowest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+6.4 pp-7.8 pp2nd most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.0 pp+2.2 pp9th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA10.1×11.9×6th cheapest of 15
Net debt / EBITDA-0.1×2.5×least indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Skanska SKA-B.STSweden$12.1B+16%-6%4%17.1×8.3%+2.0%
Kajima 1812.TJapan$12.5B-27%+4%8%10.8×-1.9%+10.0%
Eiffage FGR.PAFrance$11.5B-20%+5%10%9.3×-6.9%+9.4%
Power Construction Corporation of China 601669.SSChina$11.5B-20%-2%4%8.4×n/an/a
China Communications Construction 1800.HKHong Kong$12.8B-26%-5%4%3.1×n/an/a
China Railway Construction 1186.HKHong Kong$11.4B-22%-5%4%3.2×n/an/a
Sichuan Road & Bridge 600039.SSChina$11.4B+8%+8%10%9.7×-5.0%+12.3%
Acciona ANA.MCSpain$13.4B-16%+8%6%19.8×8.2%+25.6%
Taisei 1801.TJapan$10.8B-38%+2%9%9.9×0.6%+7.1%
China Energy Engineering 601868.SSChina$13.6B-18%-5%4%17.9×n/an/a
MasTec MTZUnited States$14.0B-58%+26%5%15.0×21.6%+17.7%
Tetra Tech TTEKUnited States$10.3B+33%-8%12%24.0×8.3%+12.7%
Atkinsrealis ATRL.TOCanada$9.94B-7%+15%7%19.9×11.4%+9.6%
China Railway 0390.HKHong Kong$15.0B-19%-4%4%3.6×n/an/a
Saipem SPM.MIItaly$9.38B-9%+2%4%27.1×6.9%+16.1%
SamsungE&A 028050.KSSouth Korea$8.73B+14%+19%11%13.6×-2.1%+6.1%
Aecom ACMUnited States$8.59B-17%-4%5%11.0×7.3%+4.0%
Stantec STN.TOCanada$8.42B-16%+10%10%16.0×3.9%+11.5%
WSP Global WSP.TOCanada$17.5B-19%+10%10%14.4×0.0%+15.7%
APi APGUnited States$17.5B-7%+16%7%20.7×27.8%+17.1%
JSW Infrastructure JSWINFRA.NSIndia$8.33B+20%+17%36%46.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Skanska's main competitors?
Named competitors: Vinci (DG.PA), Bouygues Construction (EN.PA), NCC AB (NCC-A.ST). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Kajima (1812.T), Eiffage (FGR.PA), Power Construction Corporation of China (601669.SS), China Communications Construction (1800.HK), China Railway Construction (1186.HK), Sichuan Road & Bridge (600039.SS).
Is Skanska expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.1× against a peer median of 14.0×, 8th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +6 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Skanska stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +16.5% against -17.6% for the median peer; over one year +11.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.