Loading…

TechnipFMC plcFTICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Oilfield Services/Equipment

Global oilfield equipment and subsea engineering company supplying subsea production systems and surface technologies to oil and gas producers.

Momentum weak 33
Mkt cap
$24.7B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$205M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+27.1 pp
WACC 9.1%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB / B
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$63.52
1D+3.1%
1W-7.6%
1M-8.8%
3M-14.3%
6M-9.4%
YTD+42.5%
1Y+50.0%
ATR %4.2%
Beta0.40
52w lowhigh21.3% off high

What TechnipFMC does

Global oilfield equipment and subsea engineering company supplying subsea production systems and surface technologies to oil and gas producers.

Wins subsea projects through bids, books revenue gradually as equipment is built and installed, and reports an order backlog that shows work ahead; after installation it earns from services on those systems. It was formed in 2017 by merging Technip and FMC Technologies, and spun off its engineering arm Technip Energies in 2021.

Products and services

  • Subsea production systems
  • Surface technologies (wellheads)
  • iEPCI integrated projects
  • Measurement/flow solutions

Customers

  • National and international oil companies (offshore

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Oilfield services/equipment
  • Subsea production systems & surface…
  • Deepwater offshore oil & gas…

What could go right

  • Deepwater/offshore capex upcycle
  • Integrated project (iEPCI) adoption

What could go wrong

  • Offshore capex cyclicality
  • Long project lead-time/execution risk

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, installed base, process know-how). Integrated subsea engineering and long project track record create high switching costs on deepwater projects.

Headquarters: London, UK / Houston, US · Founded: 2017 · Employees: 25,407

Named competitors

TechnipFMC at a glance

Size TechnipFMC (FTI) is a United States Energy company (Oilfield Services/Equipment) with a market value of $24.7B, the 426th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $63.52 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.4%, against -14.9% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.6%); the operating margin is 15.6% (peer median 15.6%).

Valuation It trades at 17.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.7× (5th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 27.1 points above its cost of capital (9.1% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $15.1B at 30 Sep 2026, down 10% on a year earlier — 1.4 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit TechnipFMC has 2 bonds outstanding ($223M), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like B at a weighted spread of 435 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 3.8% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026FTI 89Peer median 82
Six months, rebased to 100: TechnipFMC against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

TechnipFMC financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$10.6B$9.93B$9.08B$7.81B$6.69B
Revenue growth—+9%+16%+17%—
Gross profit$2.49B$2.16B$1.71B$1.27B$921M
EBITDA$2.03B$1.78B$1.34B$904M$614M
Net income$1.28B$964M$843M$56.2M-$107M
Free cash flow$1.59B$1.45B$679M$451M$194M
Capital expenditure$271M$317M$282M$225M$158M
Total debt$1.30B$1.34B$1.79B$1.97B$2.29B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

TechnipFMC competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%HAL002353SUBCNOVWFRDSBMOAROCWHDSEIKGSUSACWBINESRLBRTFLOCXPROBWERESFTI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. TechnipFMC is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%10×20×30×40×HAL002353SUBCNOVWFRDSBMOWHDSEIKGSUSACWBINESRBWERESFTIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. TechnipFMC is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%75%HAL002353SUBCNOVWFRDSBMOWHDKGSFLOCINVXHOSFTIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. TechnipFMC is the large dot.

TechnipFMC competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (FTI vs BKR vs SLB vs HAL)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
TechnipFMC FTI$24.7B-9%+8%16%17.4×3.7%
Baker Hughes BKR$47.5B-25%+4%12%17.4×10.0%
Schlumberger SLB$73.7B-6%+5%14%17.2×7.3%
Halliburton HAL$26.3B-20%+2%13%11.7×-0.3%

How TechnipFMC compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

TechnipFMC against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureFTIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.8%-10.4%8th highest of 21
6-month return-9.4%-14.9%7th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-21.3%-32.1%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.0%+7.6%11th highest of 21
Operating margin15.6%15.6%11th highest of 21
Forward P/E17.4×14.7×5th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)3.7%4.2%9th least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.5%+13.2%4th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.8 pp-9.9 pp3rd most demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+27.1 pp-0.3 pphighest of 21
EV / EBITDA12.3×8.0×3rd most expensive of 20
Net debt / EBITDA0.1×1.4×6th least indebted of 20
Bond spread435 bp126 bpwidest of 4

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
TechnipFMC FTIUnited States$24.7B-9%+8%16%17.4×3.7%+8.5%
Halliburton HALUnited States$26.3B-20%+2%13%11.7×-0.3%+9.0%
Yantai Jereh Oilfield Services 002353.SZChina$12.2B-42%+13%19%24.1×14.8%+14.5%
Subsea 7 SUBC.OLNorway$9.71B-5%-2%13%12.4×-2.4%+17.7%
NOV NOVUnited States$6.26B-9%-1%6%14.8×6.8%+7.6%
Weatherford International WFRDUnited States$6.12B-17%-6%14%13.4×-4.0%+5.9%
SBM Offshore SBMO.ASNetherlands$6.08B-8%+1%31%6.2×-14.4%+11.3%
Archrock AROCUnited States$4.83B-25%+4%39%13.8×2.8%+11.2%
Cactus WHDUnited States$4.67B+7%+40%19%16.8×14.1%+25.4%
Solaris Energy Infrastructure SEIUnited States$4.63B-21%+71%24%16.8×n/an/a
Kodiak Gas Services KGSUnited States$4.21B-40%+8%33%17.0×9.3%+19.7%
USA Compression Partners LP USACUnited States$3.62B-11%+29%29%15.6×-0.4%+8.4%
Waterbridge Infrastructure LLC WBIUnited States$3.06B-9%+103%17%40.2×n/an/a
National Energy Services Reunited NESRUnited States$2.01B-14%+24%9%9.9×1.2%+9.7%
Liberty Energy LBRTUnited States$1.95B-64%+14%2%n/an/an/a
Flowco FLOCUnited States$1.81B-19%+20%19%13.1×8.0%+72.3%
Innovex International INVXUnited States$1.76B-6%+7%12%14.7×5.7%+21.8%
Expro XPROUnited States$1.47B-14%-5%4%18.0×13.9%+18.9%
BW Energy BWE.OLNorway$1.30B-15%-25%26%13.1×n/an/a
Hornbeck Offshore Services HOSUnited States$1.18Bn/a+2%8%8.6×-1.1%+12.0%
RPC RESUnited States$1.18B-22%+18%3%17.9×12.2%+22.1%

TechnipFMC bonds and credit

TechnipFMC has 2 bonds outstanding with $223M face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like B. Weighted yield 7.43%, a spread of 435 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

TechnipFMC backlog

TechnipFMC reported $15.1B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, down 10% from a year earlier and down 8% from the previous quarter. That is 1.4 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 0.54.

Questions

Who are TechnipFMC's main competitors?
Named competitors: Baker Hughes (BKR), SLB (Schlumberger) (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), Subsea7 (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Halliburton (HAL), Yantai Jereh Oilfield Services (002353.SZ), Subsea 7 (SUBC.OL), NOV (NOV), Weatherford International (WFRD), SBM Offshore (SBMO.AS).
Is TechnipFMC expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.4× against a peer median of 14.7×, 5th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has TechnipFMC stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.4% against -14.9% for the median peer; over one year +50.0%.
What is TechnipFMC's backlog?
TechnipFMC's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $15.1B at 30 Sep 2026, -10% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.