Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ENH.OL Sed Energy Holdings PLCOpen in the cockpit ↗

Sed Energy Holdings PLCENH.OLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Norway · NOK·Energy›Contract Drilling
Momentum laggard 13
Mkt cap
$520M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.10M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
5.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+11.4 pp
WACC 8.7%
Hurdle
-49 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · NOKNOK 6.60
1D+0.5%
1W-3.1%
1M+4.3%
3M-19.1%
6M-24.8%
YTD-19.3%
1Y-18.9%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh35.6% off high

What Sed Energy does

No business profile yet.

Sed Energy at a glance

Size Sed Energy (ENH.OL) is a Norway Energy company (Contract Drilling) with a market value of $520M, the 86th largest of 115 Norway companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NOK 6.60 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 24.8%, against -6.9% for the median peer and +2.7% for the Norway market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 9 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 91.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.7%); the operating margin is 36.3% (peer median 7.4%).

Valuation It trades at 5.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.2× (cheapest of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +38%, so the hurdle is -49 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.4 points above its cost of capital (8.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 93ENH.OL 74
Six months, rebased to 100: Sed Energy against the median of its 8 peers (local-currency closes).

Sed Energy financials

Reported figures in NOK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNOK 2.48BNOK 2.21BNOK 1.44BNOK 366MNOK 194M
Revenue growth—+53%+293%+89%—
Gross profitNOK 1.10BNOK 882MNOK 525MNOK 98.9M-NOK 56.1M
EBITDANOK 1.32BNOK 1.07BNOK 719MNOK 123M-NOK 26.6M
Net incomeNOK 658MNOK 372MNOK 276MNOK 33.1M-NOK 124M
Free cash flowNOK 872MNOK 572MNOK 161MNOK 40.9M-NOK 216M
Capital expenditureNOK 157MNOK 97.1MNOK 561MNOK 29.0MNOK 37.5M
Total debtNOK 705MNOK 820MNOK 730MNOK 165MNOK 160M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sed Energy competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%ESIVTURAPHXAKASTMDIBORRNBRPDENH.OL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sed Energy is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%10×20×30×ESIPHXAKASTMDINBRPDENH.OLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sed Energy is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%ESIVTURAMDINBRPDENH.OLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Sed Energy is the large dot.

Sed Energy competitors and peer comparison

How Sed Energy compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sed Energy against its 8 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureENH.OLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+4.3%-8.0%3rd highest of 9
6-month return-24.8%-6.9%4th lowest of 9
Distance from 52-week high-35.6%-23.6%2nd lowest of 9
Revenue growth (TTM)+91.4%+5.7%highest of 9
Operating margin36.3%7.4%highest of 9
Forward P/E5.7×15.2×cheapest of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-10.9%11.6%least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+38.2%+11.8%highest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-49.1 pp+6.1 ppleast demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+11.4 pp-3.4 pp2nd highest of 9
EV / EBITDA3.8×7.1×cheapest of 9
Net debt / EBITDA0.1×1.1×3rd least indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Sed Energy ENH.OLNorway$520M-25%+91%36%5.7×-10.9%+38.2%
Ensign Energy Services ESI.TOCanada$517M+6%-1%1%34.7×41.1%+11.8%
Ventura Offshore VTURA.OLNorway$371M+3%-2%34%n/a3.6%-2.5%
PHX Energy Services PHX.TOCanada$342M-9%+7%4%8.9×n/an/a
Akastor AKAST.OLNorway$316M-31%+67%34%9.9×n/an/a
Major Drilling Group International MDI.TOCanada$893M-5%+23%6%23.1×21.7%+15.5%
Borr Drilling BORRUnited States$1,000M-45%+3%21%n/an/an/a
Nabors Industries NBRUnited States$1.11B-25%+5%8%19.1×4.0%+8.3%
Precision Drilling PD.TOCanada$1.16B+6%+8%7%11.4×11.6%+14.5%

Questions

Which companies are Sed Energy's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Ensign Energy Services (ESI.TO), Ventura Offshore (VTURA.OL), PHX Energy Services (PHX.TO), Akastor (AKAST.OL), Major Drilling Group International (MDI.TO), Borr Drilling (BORR), Nabors Industries (NBR), Precision Drilling (PD.TO).
Is Sed Energy expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 5.7× against a peer median of 15.2×, cheapest of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +38%, so the hurdle is -49 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Sed Energy stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -24.8% against -6.9% for the median peer; over one year -18.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.