Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › PD.TO Precision Drilling CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Precision Drilling CorporationPD.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Energy›Contract Drilling

Canadian land-drilling contractor providing drilling rigs and services to oil and gas producers in North America and internationally.

≈ A land drilling contractor like Helmerich & PayneMomentum leader 88
Mkt cap
$1.16B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$11.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.6 pp
WACC 8.9%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
97 days
11 Feb 2027
Close · CADC$129.95
1D+2.7%
1W-12.3%
1M+9.2%
3M+23.1%
6M+5.7%
YTD+31.9%
1Y+59.8%
ATR %4.7%
52w lowhigh17.3% off high

What Precision Drilling does

Canadian land-drilling contractor providing drilling rigs and services to oil and gas producers in North America and internationally.

Rents a rig with its crew to producers for a daily rate (a day rate), often under contracts of a set term, so income follows rigs working and the rate each earns rather than oil output. Most activity is in Canada and the US, with a smaller international business.

In one line: A land drilling contractor like Helmerich & Payne.

Products and services

  • Land drilling rig services (Canada/US)
  • International drilling operations
  • Drilling automation technology

Customers

  • Oil and gas E&P operators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Oilfield services
  • Land drilling rig operations
  • Drilling technology/automation

What could go right

  • North American drilling activity recovery
  • Day-rate pricing improvement

What could go wrong

  • Oil & gas drilling activity cyclicality
  • Rig oversupply/day-rate competition

Moat: narrow (installed base, scale). Large modern rig fleet and automation technology provide efficiency advantages over smaller drilling contractors.

Headquarters: Calgary, Canada · Founded: 1951

Named competitors

Precision Drilling at a glance

Size Precision Drilling (PD.TO) is a Canada Energy company (Contract Drilling) with a market value of $1.16B, the 232nd largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$129.95 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 5.7%, against -9.2% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 12 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.0%); the operating margin is 6.8% (peer median 10.0%).

Valuation It trades at 11.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.8× (5th cheapest of 10).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.6 points below its cost of capital (8.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026PD.TO 108Peer median 91
Six months, rebased to 100: Precision Drilling against the median of its 11 peers (local-currency closes).

Precision Drilling financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$1.99BC$1.84BC$1.90BC$1.94BC$1.62B
Revenue growth—-3%-2%+20%—
Gross profitC$263MC$286MC$344MC$436MC$214M
EBITDAC$473MC$490MC$521MC$611MC$312M
Net income-C$5.08MC$1.84MC$111MC$289M-C$34.3M
Free cash flowC$100MC$149MC$264MC$276MC$52.9M
Capital expenditureC$306MC$264MC$217MC$227MC$184M
Total debtC$700MC$744MC$888MC$992MC$1.15B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Precision Drilling competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%NBRBORRMDIODLENHESISDRLHPVTURAPHXAKASTPD.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Precision Drilling is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%10×20×30×NBRMDIODLENHESISDRLHPPHXAKASTPD.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Precision Drilling is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%NBRMDIENHESISDRLHPVTURAPD.TOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Precision Drilling is the large dot.

Precision Drilling competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (PD.TO vs HP vs ESI.TO vs NBR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Precision Drilling PD.TO$1.16B+6%+8%7%11.4×11.6%
Helmerich & Payne HP$3.52B-7%+17%3%26.3×19.9%
Ensign Energy Services ESI.TO$517M+6%-1%1%34.7×41.1%
Nabors Industries NBR$1.11B-25%+5%8%19.1×4.0%

How Precision Drilling compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Precision Drilling against its 11 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePD.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+9.2%-7.5%highest of 12
6-month return+5.7%-9.2%2nd highest of 12
Distance from 52-week high-17.3%-26.2%3rd highest of 12
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.5%+11.0%6th lowest of 12
Operating margin6.8%10.0%5th lowest of 12
Forward P/E11.4×15.8×5th cheapest of 10
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)11.6%16.0%4th least demanding of 8
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.5%+11.8%4th highest of 8
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.9 pp+6.1 pp3rd least demanding of 8
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.6 pp-3.4 pp5th lowest of 12
EV / EBITDA4.9×6.4×4th cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA1.4×0.7×6th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Precision Drilling PD.TOCanada$1.16B+6%+8%7%11.4×11.6%+14.5%
Nabors Industries NBRUnited States$1.11B-25%+5%8%19.1×4.0%+8.3%
Borr Drilling BORRUnited States$1,000M-45%+3%21%n/an/an/a
Major Drilling Group International MDI.TOCanada$893M-5%+23%6%23.1×21.7%+15.5%
Odfjell Drilling ODL.OLNorway$2.57B+4%+11%23%10.0×n/an/a
Sed Energy ENH.OLNorway$520M-25%+91%36%5.7×-10.9%+38.2%
Ensign Energy Services ESI.TOCanada$517M+6%-1%1%34.7×41.1%+11.8%
Seadrill SDRLUnited States$2.63B-13%+17%10%15.8×16.0%+6.3%
Helmerich & Payne HPUnited States$3.52B-7%+17%3%26.3×19.9%+16.1%
Ventura Offshore VTURA.OLNorway$371M+3%-2%34%n/a3.6%-2.5%
PHX Energy Services PHX.TOCanada$342M-9%+7%4%8.9×n/an/a
Akastor AKAST.OLNorway$316M-31%+67%34%9.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Precision Drilling's main competitors?
Named competitors: Helmerich & Payne (HP), Ensign Energy Services (ESI.TO), Nabors Industries (NBR). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Nabors Industries (NBR), Borr Drilling (BORR), Major Drilling Group International (MDI.TO), Odfjell Drilling (ODL.OL), Sed Energy (ENH.OL), Ensign Energy Services (ESI.TO).
Is Precision Drilling expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.4× against a peer median of 15.8×, 5th cheapest of 10 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Precision Drilling stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +5.7% against -9.2% for the median peer; over one year +59.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.