Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MTS.AX Metcash LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Metcash LimitedMTS.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Consumer Staples›Food Distributors

Wholesale distributor supplying independent supermarkets (IGA), hardware (Mitre 10) and liquor retailers across Australia.

≈ Australia's wholesale grocery/hardware distributor, like a smaller SpartanNashMomentum strong 79
Mkt cap
$2.55B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.91M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.8 pp
WACC 7.3%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
31 days
7 Dec 2026
Close · AUDA$3.34
1D+0.3%
1W+4.0%
1M+9.5%
3M+6.4%
6M+12.5%
YTD+1.2%
1Y-14.6%
ATR %1.9%
52w lowhigh16.1% off high

What Metcash does

Wholesale distributor supplying independent supermarkets (IGA), hardware (Mitre 10) and liquor retailers across Australia.

Earns a wholesale margin on groceries, hardware and liquor sold to independent retailers, and fees for marketing, store branding and property services, so its health depends on those retailers competing with national chains Coles and Woolworths.

In one line: Australia's wholesale grocery/hardware distributor, like a smaller SpartanNash.

Products and services

  • Grocery wholesale (IGA)
  • Hardware wholesale (Mitre 10/Total Tools)
  • Liquor wholesale

Customers

  • Independent supermarket owners
  • Independent hardware/liquor retailers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Wholesale procurement
  • Distribution to independent retailers
  • Retail banner support (IGA, Mitre 10)

What could go right

  • Independent retail network growth
  • Hardware segment expansion

What could go wrong

  • Competition from Woolworths/Coles/Bunnings
  • Thin wholesale distribution margins

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, brand). Large-scale wholesale distribution network supporting independent retail banners across Australia.

Headquarters: Sydney, Australia · Founded: 1927 · Employees: 14,000

Named competitors

Metcash at a glance

Size Metcash (MTS.AX) is an Australia Consumer Staples company (Food Distributors) with a market value of $2.55B, the 107th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$3.34 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 12.5%, against -13.1% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 14 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.6%); the operating margin is 2.7% (peer median 4.3%).

Valuation It trades at 14.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.5× (6th cheapest of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.8 points above its cost of capital (7.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 7 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MTS.AX 115Peer median 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Metcash against the median of its 13 peers (local-currency closes).

Metcash financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-04-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueA$17.4BA$17.4BA$17.3BA$15.9BA$15.8B
Revenue growth—0%+9%+1%—
Gross profitA$858MA$858MA$841MA$780MA$760M
EBITDAA$724MA$724MA$700MA$646MA$636M
Net incomeA$279MA$279MA$283MA$257MA$259M
Free cash flowA$383MA$383MA$390MA$347MA$301M
Capital expenditureA$175MA$175MA$148MA$136MA$152M
Total debtn/aA$1.90BA$1.89BA$1.41BA$1.49B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Metcash competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%0%+20%+40%MFIUNFIPBHCHEF9869002695YNGAAGCC1768DNUT600073MTS.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Metcash is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%20×40×MFIUNFIPBHCHEFDOLE002695YNGA1768DNUT600073MTS.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Metcash is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%0%50%100%150%MFIUNFICHEF9869DOLE002695YNGA1768DNUT600073MTS.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Metcash is the large dot.

Metcash competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MTS.AX vs WOW.AX vs COL.AX vs WES.AX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Metcash MTS.AX$2.55B+12%0%3%14.1×0.9%
Woolworths WOW.AX$35.8B+29%+4%4%28.8×8.8%
Coles COL.AX$21.0B+7%+3%4%24.4×5.5%
Wesfarmers WES.AX$64.0B+14%+3%9%30.5×20.6%

How Metcash compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Metcash against its 13 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMTS.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+9.5%+2.8%4th highest of 14
6-month return+12.5%-13.1%4th highest of 14
Distance from 52-week high-16.1%-19.7%5th highest of 14
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.2%+4.6%5th lowest of 14
Operating margin2.7%4.3%7th lowest of 14
Forward P/E14.1×14.5×6th cheapest of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)0.9%9.0%2nd least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.9%+6.3%6th lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-3.0 pp-5.5 pp6th most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.8 pp-1.2 pp4th highest of 13
Net debt / EBITDA2.5×2.4×6th least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Metcash MTS.AXAustralia$2.55B+12%0%3%14.1×0.9%+3.9%
Maple Leaf Foods MFI.TOCanada$2.39B-13%-17%8%16.1×2.4%-1.9%
United Natural Foods UNFIUnited States$2.73B-13%-2%1%13.6×6.5%+2.9%
Premium Brands PBH.TOCanada$2.86B-13%+20%5%12.2×7.4%+12.9%
Chefs' Warehouse CHEFUnited States$4.51B+27%+12%4%36.3×22.6%+30.1%
Kato Sangyo 9869.TJapan$1.35B+10%+2%1%n/a-9.5%+1.9%
Dole DOLEUnited States$1.31B-7%+8%2%10.6×4.1%+16.1%
Jiangxi Huangshanghuang Group Food 002695.SZChina$880M-14%+17%7%39.9×14.7%-7.1%
Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C YNGA.LUnited Kingdom$822M+52%+5%14%15.4×9.0%+42.0%
Agencia Comercial Spirits AGCCUnited States$804M-24%+145%13%n/an/an/a
Busy Ming 1768.HKHong Kong$8.31B-36%+68%5%11.3×16.0%+143.4%
Krispy Kreme DNUTUnited States$723M+16%-5%0%50.0×23.2%+6.3%
Shanghai Bright Meat 600073.SSChina$702M-15%+3%-3%8.5×37.0%-1.5%
COFCO Joycome Foods 1610.HKHong Kong$669M-18%-8%-10%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Metcash's main competitors?
Named competitors: Woolworths Group (WOW.AX), Coles Group (COL.AX), Bunnings (WES.AX). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Maple Leaf Foods (MFI.TO), United Natural Foods (UNFI), Premium Brands (PBH.TO), Chefs' Warehouse (CHEF), Kato Sangyo (9869.T), Dole (DOLE).
Is Metcash expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.1× against a peer median of 14.5×, 6th cheapest of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Metcash stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +12.5% against -13.1% for the median peer; over one year -14.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.