Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9869.T Kato Sangyo Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Kato Sangyo Co., Ltd.9869.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Staples›Food Distributors

Kobe-based wholesale food distributor supplying supermarkets, restaurants and food manufacturers across Japan.

≈ A smaller, Japan-focused Sysco/US FoodsMomentum strong 74
Mkt cap
$1.35B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
59%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.69M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+4.8 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-11 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥6,770
1D-4.7%
1W+1.8%
1M+1.8%
3M+5.6%
6M+10.1%
YTD+5.6%
1Y+12.3%
ATR %2.6%
52w lowhigh5.3% off high

What Kato Sangyo does

Kobe-based wholesale food distributor supplying supermarkets, restaurants and food manufacturers across Japan.

Buys from food makers and delivers to supermarkets and restaurants, earning a thin margin per item plus rebates from manufacturers, so logistics scale across dry, chilled and frozen goods and efficient delivery matter more than price.

In one line: A smaller, Japan-focused Sysco/US Foods.

Products and services

  • Food wholesale distribution
  • Processed/frozen food distribution

Customers

  • Supermarkets
  • Restaurants/foodservice operators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Food distribution
  • Wholesale food distribution
  • Grocery, restaurant, processed-food…

What could go right

  • Foodservice/retail volume growth

What could go wrong

  • Thin wholesale margins
  • Food price/input cost swings

Moat: none (scale, distribution). Distribution scale in a low-margin, competitive wholesale food market.

Headquarters: Kobe, Japan · Founded: 1947 · Employees: 4,099

Named competitors

Kato Sangyo at a glance

Size Kato Sangyo (9869.T) is a Japan Consumer Staples company (Food Distributors) with a market value of $1.35B, the 609th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥6,770 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 10.1%, against -13.3% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.7%); the operating margin is 1.5% (peer median 2.3%).

Valuation It trades at 0.1× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 0.9× (cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is -11 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.8 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20269869.T 110Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Kato Sangyo against the median of its 18 peers (local-currency closes).

Kato Sangyo financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2025-09-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥1.24T¥1.21T¥1.17T¥1.10T¥1.04T
Revenue growth—+4%+6%+6%—
Gross profit¥90.4B¥84.4B¥79.9B¥74.8B¥68.6B
EBITDA¥25.2B¥24.4B¥22.8B¥21.7B¥18.3B
Net income¥16.5B¥13.2B¥14.5B¥12.0B¥11.3B
Free cash flow¥14.9B-¥7.87B¥18.8B¥8.80B¥11.4B
Capital expenditure¥6.58B¥15.2B¥8.73B¥8.37B¥4.99B
Total debt¥14.4B¥13.4B¥14.6B¥15.3B¥14.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kato Sangyo competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%0%+20%+40%DOLE002695YNGAAGCCMFIDNUTMTS600073UNFI1610ATRAVCHEF000529MARR0027269869.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kato Sangyo is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×1×2×DOLE002695YNGAMFIDNUTMTS600073UNFI1610PBH2292ATRAVCHEF0005290027260023309869.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kato Sangyo is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%DOLE002695YNGAMFIDNUTMTS600073UNFIPBHATRAVCHEF0027269869.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Kato Sangyo is the large dot.

Kato Sangyo competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9869.T vs 8020.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Kato Sangyo 9869.T$1.35B+10%+2%1%0.1×-9.5%
Kanematsu 8020.T$2.35B+2%+4%5%0.5×-2.4%

How Kato Sangyo compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kato Sangyo against its 18 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9869.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.8%+2.0%10th highest of 19
6-month return+10.1%-13.3%6th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-5.3%-20.1%highest of 19
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.3%+2.7%9th lowest of 19
Operating margin1.5%2.3%8th lowest of 19
EV / Sales0.1×0.9×cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-9.5%8.2%least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+1.9%+3.9%5th lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-11.4 pp+0.3 pp3rd least demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.8 pp-1.7 pphighest of 18
Net debt / EBITDA-2.4×2.7×2nd least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Kato Sangyo 9869.TJapan$1.35B+10%+2%1%0.1×-9.5%+1.9%
Dole DOLEUnited States$1.31B-7%+8%2%0.3×4.1%+16.1%
Jiangxi Huangshanghuang Group Food 002695.SZChina$880M-14%+17%7%2.6×14.7%-7.1%
Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C YNGA.LUnited Kingdom$822M+52%+5%14%1.8×9.0%+42.0%
Agencia Comercial Spirits AGCCUnited States$804M-24%+145%13%n/an/an/a
Maple Leaf Foods MFI.TOCanada$2.39B-13%-17%8%1.1×2.4%-1.9%
Krispy Kreme DNUTUnited States$723M+16%-5%0%1.3×23.2%+6.3%
Metcash MTS.AXAustralia$2.55B+12%0%3%0.3×0.9%+3.9%
Shanghai Bright Meat 600073.SSChina$702M-15%+3%-3%0.2×37.0%-1.5%
United Natural Foods UNFIUnited States$2.73B-13%-2%1%0.2×6.5%+2.9%
COFCO Joycome Foods 1610.HKHong Kong$669M-18%-8%-10%0.9×n/an/a
Premium Brands PBH.TOCanada$2.86B-13%+20%5%0.9×7.4%+12.9%
S Foods 2292.TJapan$537M-6%+8%2%0.2×n/an/a
Atria ATRAV.HEFinland$509M+12%+6%4%0.4×-5.2%+3.8%
Chefs' Warehouse CHEFUnited States$4.51B+27%+12%4%1.2×22.6%+30.1%
Guangdong Guanghong 000529.SZChina$404M-19%-12%-12%2.0×n/an/a
MARR MARR.MIItaly$389M-38%+3%2%0.3×n/an/a
ShandongLongda Meishi 002726.SZChina$382M-34%-25%-9%0.5×23.5%-16.1%
Shandong Delisi Food 002330.SZChina$362M-20%-10%-2%0.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Kato Sangyo's main competitors?
Named competitors: Kanematsu (8020.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Dole (DOLE), Jiangxi Huangshanghuang Group Food (002695.SZ), Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C (YNGA.L), Agencia Comercial Spirits (AGCC), Maple Leaf Foods (MFI.TO), Krispy Kreme (DNUT).
Is Kato Sangyo expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.1× against a peer median of 0.9×, cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is -11 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Kato Sangyo stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +10.1% against -13.3% for the median peer; over one year +12.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.