Loading…

Kimberly-ClarkKMBCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Staples›Household/Personal Care

Makes tissue and personal-care paper products including Kleenex, Huggies diapers and Scott paper towels.

Momentum strong 72
Mkt cap
$66.5B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$720M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+18.3 pp
WACC 6.3%
Hurdle
+7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
A / AA
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
82 days
27 Jan 2027
Close · USD$108.43
1D-1.8%
1W+0.5%
1M+10.9%
3M+0.4%
6M+11.8%
YTD+10.3%
1Y+12.6%
ATR %2.9%
Beta0.05
52w lowhigh7.2% off high

What Kimberly-Clark does

Makes tissue and personal-care paper products including Kleenex, Huggies diapers and Scott paper towels.

Sells through large retailers, where Huggies and Kleenex compete for shelf space with stores' own-label versions, and through distributors to offices and factories. Pulp is its main raw material, so costs move with pulp prices. In late 2025 it agreed to buy Kenvue, adding Tylenol and other health brands.

Products and services

  • Baby & child care (Huggies)
  • Personal care/tissue (Kleenex, Scott, Cottonelle)
  • K-C Professional (commercial paper products)

Customers

  • Global retailers
  • Consumers
  • Commercial/institutional buyers (K-C Professional)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Household & personal care
  • Consumer paper products manufacturing
  • Global retail distribution

What could go right

  • Emerging-market diaper/tissue penetration growth
  • Pricing power on category-leading brands

What could go wrong

  • Pulp/input cost inflation
  • Private-label competition

Moat: narrow (brand, scale, distribution). Category-leading paper/diaper brands with global manufacturing and retail-shelf scale.

Headquarters: Dallas, Texas, US · Founded: 1872 · Employees: 36,000

Named competitors

Kimberly-Clark at a glance

Size Kimberly-Clark (KMB) is a United States Consumer Staples company (Household/Personal Care) with a market value of $66.5B, the 199th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $108.43 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 11.8%, against +20.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 12 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 12.2% over the last twelve months (peer median -1.8%); the operating margin is 14.2% (peer median 18.0%).

Valuation It trades at 15.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.4× (cheapest of 12).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -3%, so the hurdle is +7 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 18.3 points above its cost of capital (6.3% WACC).

Credit Kimberly-Clark has 17 bonds outstanding ($11.1B), rated A by the agencies and trading like AA at a weighted spread of 58 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 15.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 27 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 122KMB 115
Six months, rebased to 100: Kimberly-Clark against the median of its 11 peers (local-currency closes).

Kimberly-Clark financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$16.6B$16.4B$16.8B$17.1B$20.2B
Revenue growth—-2%-2%-15%—
Gross profit$6.09B$5.92B$6.29B$6.27B$6.22B
EBITDA$3.09B$3.20B$3.14B$3.41B$3.39B
Net income$1.96B$2.02B$2.54B$1.76B$1.93B
Free cash flow$1.82B$1.64B$2.51B$2.78B$1.86B
Capital expenditure$1.51B$1.14B$721M$766M$876M
Total debt$6.52B$7.55B$7.80B$8.36B$8.93B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kimberly-Clark competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%+60%+10%+15%CLHINDUNILVRRKTGIVNELULVRDSFIRCHD4452BEIKMB6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kimberly-Clark is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%20×30×40×CLHINDUNILVRRKTGIVNELULVRDSFIRCHD4452BEIESSITY-AKMBRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kimberly-Clark is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%0%10%20%CLHINDUNILVRRKTGIVNELULVRDSFIRCHD4452BEIESSITY-AKMBGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Kimberly-Clark is the large dot.

Kimberly-Clark competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (KMB vs PG vs ESSITY-A.ST vs 8113.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Kimberly-Clark KMB$66.5B+12%-12%14%15.3×4.1%
Procter & Gamble PG$383B+13%+4%24%23.4×-0.3%
Essity ESSITY-A.ST$19.9B+17%-2%12%15.4×-3.3%
Unicharm 8113.T$12.1B+15%0%12%24.5×-2.0%
Hengan Int'l 1044.HK$3.28B-16%+2%11%9.1×-8.8%
Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA SCA-A.ST$8.72B+21%-3%6%33.7×30.3%
Clearwater Paper CLWn/a-3%n/an/an/an/a

How Kimberly-Clark compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kimberly-Clark against its 11 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureKMBPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+10.9%+10.2%5th highest of 12
6-month return+11.8%+20.8%3rd lowest of 12
Distance from 52-week high-7.2%-5.1%6th lowest of 12
Revenue growth (TTM)-12.2%-1.8%3rd lowest of 12
Operating margin14.2%18.0%6th lowest of 12
Forward P/E15.3×24.4×cheapest of 12
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.1%6.9%6th least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)-3.0%+3.4%lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+7.1 pp+2.1 pp6th most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+18.3 pp+6.6 pp2nd highest of 12
EV / EBITDA23.4×15.8×3rd most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA1.8×1.4×6th most indebted of 12
Bond spread58 bp72 bp3rd tightest of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kimberly-Clark KMBUnited States$66.5B+12%-12%14%15.3×4.1%-3.0%
Colgate-Palmolive CLUnited States$76.8B+10%+6%22%24.2×-5.5%+4.4%
Hindustan Unilever HINDUNILVR.NSIndia$49.6B-12%+6%21%41.5×27.2%+6.5%
Reckitt Benckiser RKT.LUnited Kingdom$47.6B+22%-2%28%16.4×1.6%+0.3%
Givaudan GIVN.SWSwitzerland$45.8B+47%-2%18%34.0×10.6%+3.4%
Estée Lauder Companies (The) ELUnited States$39.9B+28%+6%13%31.1×16.8%-1.5%
Unilever ULVR.LUnited Kingdom$143B+15%-20%20%18.4×8.0%-0.8%
DSM-Firmenich DSFIR.ASNetherlands$29.5B+62%-45%8%30.1×24.3%+2.5%
Church & Dwight CHDUnited States$25.8B+17%+2%18%27.4×6.9%+4.8%
Kao 4452.TJapan$21.8B+33%+6%10%24.4×1.5%+4.1%
Beiersdorf BEI.DEGermany$20.4B+21%-2%12%22.6×-2.3%+7.0%
Essity ESSITY-A.STSweden$19.9B+17%-2%12%15.4×-3.3%+2.6%

Kimberly-Clark bonds and credit

Kimberly-Clark has 17 bonds outstanding with $11.1B face value. The agencies rate it A; its bonds trade like AA. Weighted yield 5.32%, a spread of 58 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Kimberly-Clark's main competitors?
Named competitors: Procter & Gamble (PG), Georgia-Pacific (private) (private or unlisted), Essity (ESSITY-A.ST), Unicharm (8113.T), Hengan International (1044.HK), Svenska Cellulosa SCA (SCA-A.ST). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Colgate-Palmolive (CL), Hindustan Unilever (HINDUNILVR.NS), Reckitt Benckiser (RKT.L), Givaudan (GIVN.SW), Estée Lauder Companies (The) (EL), Unilever (ULVR.L).
Is Kimberly-Clark expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.3× against a peer median of 24.4×, cheapest of 12 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -3%, so the hurdle is +7 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Kimberly-Clark stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +11.8% against +20.8% for the median peer; over one year +12.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.