Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SCA-A.ST Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA Class ASCA-A.STCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Sweden · SEK·Materials›Pulp & Paper

Sweden's largest private forest owner, producing pulp, paper, wood products and renewable energy from its forests.

≈ A Swedish WeyerhaeuserMomentum strong 70
Mkt cap
$8.72B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
48%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$721,337
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
33.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.5 pp
WACC 5.3%
Hurdle
+28 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
84 days
29 Jan 2027
Close · SEKSEK 122.00
1D-1.2%
1W+1.7%
1M+3.8%
3M+11.4%
6M+20.8%
YTD-0.5%
1Y-2.1%
ATR %2.1%
52w lowhigh4.8% off high

What Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA does

Sweden's largest private forest owner, producing pulp, paper, wood products and renewable energy from its forests.

Most profit arises from its forests, where it grows wood and supplies its own sawmills and pulp mills or sells to others, and forest land value is a separate asset. Its hygiene business was split off as Essity in 2017. Industrivarden, a Swedish investment company, is the largest shareholder by votes.

In one line: A Swedish Weyerhaeuser.

Products and services

  • Forest land/timber
  • Pulp production
  • Paper (kraftliner/containerboard)
  • Wood products & bioenergy

Customers

  • Paper/packaging manufacturers
  • Construction/wood products customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Forest products
  • Forestry, pulp, paper & wood products…

What could go right

  • Forest land value appreciation
  • Renewable/bioenergy demand

What could go wrong

  • Pulp/paper price cyclicality
  • Timberland carrying costs

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Owns Europe's largest private forest holding, a scarce, hard-to-replicate natural resource asset.

Headquarters: Sundsvall, Sweden · Founded: 1929 · Employees: 3,380

Named competitors

Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA at a glance

Size Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA (SCA-A.ST) is a Sweden Materials company (Pulp & Paper) with a market value of $8.72B, the 33rd largest of 221 Sweden companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at SEK 122.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 20.8%, against +7.5% for the median peer and +8.2% for the Sweden market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 9 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 3.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +1.9%); the operating margin is 5.5% (peer median 8.5%).

Valuation It trades at 33.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.1× (2nd most expensive of 9).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 30% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +28 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.5 points below its cost of capital (5.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012013011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026SCA-A.ST 123Peer median 109
Six months, rebased to 100: Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA against the median of its 8 peers (local-currency closes).

Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA financials

Reported figures in SEK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueSEK 20.0BSEK 20.4BSEK 20.2BSEK 18.1BSEK 20.8B
Revenue growth—+1%+12%-13%—
Gross profitSEK 3.08BSEK 1.83BSEK 1.55BSEK 680MSEK 7.03B
EBITDASEK 3.38BSEK 4.46BSEK 4.16BSEK 3.41BSEK 7.29B
Net incomeSEK 2.16BSEK 3.21BSEK 3.64BSEK 3.67BSEK 6.75B
Free cash flowSEK 1.05BSEK 1.37BSEK 1.31BSEK 759MSEK 364M
Capital expenditureSEK 2.00BSEK 2.81BSEK 2.17BSEK 3.13BSEK 5.96B
Total debtSEK 15.4BSEK 14.6BSEK 14.5BSEK 13.3BSEK 12.5B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%0%+10%SUZ002078UPMAVYHOLM-AIP3941BILLSCA-A.ST6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%-5%0%+5%+10%20×40×60×SUZ002078UPMAVYHOLM-AIP3941BILLSCA-A.STRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%10%20%30%SUZUPMAVYHOLM-AIPBILLSCA-A.STGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA is the large dot.

Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SCA-A.ST vs WY vs STEAV.HE vs UPM.HE)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA SCA-A.ST$8.72B+21%-3%6%33.7×30.3%
Weyerhaeuser WY$15.1B-10%-1%6%86.1×n/a
Stora Enso STEAV.HE$8.58B0%-1%-4%18.4×n/a
UPM-Kymmene UPM.HE$13.3B-11%-6%8%18.2×6.1%

How Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA against its 8 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSCA-A.STPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+3.8%+5.9%5th highest of 9
6-month return+20.8%+7.5%2nd highest of 9
Distance from 52-week high-4.8%-17.4%highest of 9
Revenue growth (TTM)-3.1%+1.9%4th lowest of 9
Operating margin5.5%8.5%4th lowest of 9
Forward P/E33.7×17.1×2nd most expensive of 9
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)30.3%6.9%most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.1%+6.2%lowest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+28.2 pp+2.6 ppmost demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.5 pp-2.1 pp3rd lowest of 9
EV / EBITDA29.8×10.7×most expensive of 8
Net debt / EBITDA4.5×2.4×most indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA SCA-A.STSweden$8.72B+21%-3%6%33.7×30.3%+2.1%
Suzano S.A. Sponsored ADR SUZUnited States$12.0B+9%+1%19%16.9×3.2%+8.7%
Shandong Sunpaper 002078.SZChina$6.02B-4%+9%11%10.4×n/an/a
UPM-Kymmene UPM.HEFinland$13.3B-11%-6%8%18.2×6.1%+2.3%
Avery Dennison AVYUnited States$14.1B+14%+7%13%17.4×1.9%+4.9%
Holmen HOLM-A.STSweden$4.73B-1%-5%9%22.2×7.7%+6.2%
International Paper IPUnited States$18.3B+6%+3%3%15.8×26.4%+6.1%
Rengo 3941.TJapan$2.29B+18%+4%4%11.0×n/an/a
Billerud BILL.STSweden$2.24B+35%-9%-1%70.1×24.9%+11.2%

Questions

Who are Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA's main competitors?
Named competitors: Weyerhaeuser (WY), Stora Enso (STEAV.HE), UPM-Kymmene (UPM.HE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Suzano S.A. Sponsored ADR (SUZ), Shandong Sunpaper (002078.SZ), UPM-Kymmene (UPM.HE), Avery Dennison (AVY), Holmen (HOLM-A.ST), International Paper (IP).
Is Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 33.7× against a peer median of 17.1×, 2nd most expensive of 9 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 30% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +28 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +20.8% against +7.5% for the median peer; over one year -2.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.