Loading…

Avery DennisonAVYCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Materials›Pulp & Paper

Makes pressure-sensitive adhesive materials, labels and RFID tags used on packaging, apparel and retail products.

Momentum strong 77
Mkt cap
$14.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$125M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.9 pp
WACC 8.1%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB / BBB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
89 days
3 Feb 2027
Close · USD$186.78
1D-1.5%
1W+2.5%
1M+11.4%
3M+4.7%
6M+14.2%
YTD+3.2%
1Y+8.2%
ATR %2.5%
Beta0.47
52w lowhigh5.9% off high

What Avery Dennison does

Makes pressure-sensitive adhesive materials, labels and RFID tags used on packaging, apparel and retail products.

Makes rolls of adhesive-backed label material that converters print and apply to packaging, with prices tracking paper, film and chemical costs, so volume matters more than price. The RFID tags it supplies to apparel retailers are a smaller line, tied to retailers' inventory-tracking programs.

Products and services

  • Label & graphic materials
  • Retail apparel branding/RFID (Intelligent Labels)
  • Industrial/medical adhesive solutions

Customers

  • Consumer goods brands
  • Retailers/apparel makers
  • Industrial manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Labeling & packaging materials
  • Adhesive-backed labels, RFID

What could go right

  • RFID adoption growth in retail apparel
  • Packaging/labeling demand from e-commerce and CPG

What could go wrong

  • Raw-material (resin, paper) cost volatility
  • Competitive pricing pressure in commodity label materials

Moat: narrow (scale, switching costs, IP / patents). Global materials-science scale and embedded supply relationships with major brand-owners and retailers.

Headquarters: Mentor, Ohio, United States · Founded: 1935 · Employees: 35,000

Named competitors

Avery Dennison at a glance

Size Avery Dennison (AVY) is a United States Materials company (Pulp & Paper) with a market value of $14.1B, the 627th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $186.78 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 14.2%, against +2.7% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.8% over the last twelve months (peer median -1.1%); the operating margin is 13.1% (peer median 8.5%).

Valuation It trades at 17.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.5× (4th cheapest of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.9 points above its cost of capital (8.1% WACC).

Credit Avery Dennison has 7 bonds outstanding ($3.16B), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BBB at a weighted spread of 96 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026AVY 115Peer median 104
Six months, rebased to 100: Avery Dennison against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

Avery Dennison financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$9.36B$8.86B$8.76B$8.36B$9.04B
Revenue growth—+1%+5%-7%—
Gross profit$2.70B$2.55B$2.53B$2.27B$2.40B
EBITDA$1.56B$1.45B$1.44B$1.25B$1.36B
Net income$708M$688M$705M$503M$757M
Free cash flow$1.04B$712M$730M$561M$683M
Capital expenditure$211M$200M$240M$285M$298M
Total debt$3.62B$3.95B$3.38B$3.44B$3.26B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Avery Dennison competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-10%0%+10%+20%0%+10%UPMSUZIPSCA-A002078HOLM-AAVY6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Avery Dennison is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-5%0%+5%+10%10×20×30×UPMSUZIPSCA-A002078HOLM-AAVYRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Avery Dennison is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%10%20%30%UPMSUZIPSCA-AHOLM-AAVYGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Avery Dennison is the large dot.

Avery Dennison competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (AVY vs MMM vs CCL-B.TO vs 7966.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Avery Dennison AVY$14.1B+14%+7%13%17.4×1.9%
3M MMM$95.7B+30%+2%21%19.2×11.3%
CCL Industries CCL-B.TO$11.8B+17%+5%15%18.7×1.3%
Lintec 7966.T$1.87B-14%+3%8%12.2×1.5%
Brady BRC$3.69B0%+10%16%12.0×1.0%
Nitto Denko 6988.T$13.2B+10%+7%18%15.1×2.3%

How Avery Dennison compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Avery Dennison against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAVYPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+11.4%+3.7%2nd highest of 7
6-month return+14.2%+2.7%2nd highest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-5.9%-19.1%2nd highest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.8%-1.1%2nd highest of 7
Operating margin13.1%8.5%2nd highest of 7
Forward P/E17.4×17.5×4th cheapest of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)1.9%7.7%least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.9%+6.1%3rd lowest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-3.0 pp+3.8 pp2nd least demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.9 pp-2.4 pphighest of 7
EV / EBITDA11.1×11.9×3rd cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA2.1×3.4×2nd least indebted of 6
Bond spread96 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Avery Dennison AVYUnited States$14.1B+14%+7%13%17.4×1.9%+4.9%
UPM-Kymmene UPM.HEFinland$13.3B-11%-6%8%18.2×6.1%+2.3%
Suzano S.A. Sponsored ADR SUZUnited States$12.0B+9%+1%19%16.9×3.2%+8.7%
International Paper IPUnited States$18.3B+6%+3%3%15.8×26.4%+6.1%
Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA SCA-A.STSweden$8.72B+21%-3%6%33.7×30.3%+2.1%
Shandong Sunpaper 002078.SZChina$6.02B-4%+9%11%10.4×n/an/a
Holmen HOLM-A.STSweden$4.73B-1%-5%9%22.2×7.7%+6.2%

Avery Dennison bonds and credit

Avery Dennison has 7 bonds outstanding with $3.16B face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BBB. Weighted yield 5.07%, a spread of 96 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Avery Dennison's main competitors?
Named competitors: 3M (MMM), CCL Industries (CCL-B.TO), UPM Raflatac (private or unlisted), Lintec (7966.T), Brady (BRC), Nitto Denko (6988.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes UPM-Kymmene (UPM.HE), Suzano S.A. Sponsored ADR (SUZ), International Paper (IP), Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA (SCA-A.ST), Shandong Sunpaper (002078.SZ), Holmen (HOLM-A.ST).
Is Avery Dennison expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.4× against a peer median of 17.5×, 4th cheapest of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Avery Dennison stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +14.2% against +2.7% for the median peer; over one year +8.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.