Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7966.T Lintec CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Lintec Corporation7966.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Materials›Industrial Specialties

Japanese maker of adhesive and functional films/labels used in electronics, packaging and optical displays.

≈ Japan's Avery DennisonMomentum laggard 8
Mkt cap
$1.87B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
72%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$38.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.2 pp
WACC 8.3%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥4,320
1D-4.3%
1W-19.2%
1M-28.5%
3M-30.2%
6M-14.1%
YTD-2.3%
1Y+13.4%
ATR %6.6%
52w lowhigh41.3% off high

What Lintec does

Japanese maker of adhesive and functional films/labels used in electronics, packaging and optical displays.

Coats and bonds papers and films sold by the roll, so orders repeat with customers' output. Its tapes used to hold chip wafers during grinding and cutting tie it to semiconductor production, while label stock ties it to consumer-goods packaging.

In one line: Japan's Avery Dennison.

Products and services

  • Adhesive labels
  • Optical/electronic films
  • Industrial tapes

Customers

  • Consumer goods packagers
  • Electronics/display makers
  • Retailers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Adhesive materials
  • Labels, tapes, optical/electronic films

What could go right

  • Semiconductor packaging tape demand
  • E-commerce label demand

What could go wrong

  • Print/packaging demand cyclicality

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification). Coating/adhesive formulation know-how qualified into electronics and packaging supply chains.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1934 · Employees: 5,237

Named competitors

Lintec at a glance

Size Lintec (7966.T) is a Japan Materials company (Industrial Specialties) with a market value of $1.87B, the 508th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥4,320 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 14.1%, against -1.9% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.1%); the operating margin is 8.1% (peer median 10.0%).

Valuation It trades at 12.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.1× (4th cheapest of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.2 points above its cost of capital (8.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 967966.T 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Lintec against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Lintec financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥325B¥319B¥316B¥276B¥285B
Revenue growth—+1%+14%-3%—
Gross profit¥83.6B¥79.0B¥77.4B¥59.2B¥61.1B
EBITDA¥43.8B¥42.3B¥41.9B¥26.5B¥28.7B
Net income¥19.0B¥17.4B¥14.5B¥5.24B¥11.5B
Free cash flow¥17.3B¥18.8B¥9.95B¥24.8B-¥6.61B
Capital expenditure¥15.2B¥15.2B¥24.1B¥14.9B¥13.7B
Total debt¥6.78B¥9.35B¥12.7B¥14.5B¥2.56B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Lintec competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%000552002380002440OLN6005520020960022264206CARBORUNIV688700605488603530300192GRINDWELL4966600172GRAPHITE4205UFPT7966.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Lintec is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%0×50×100×0005520023800024406005520020960022264206CARBORUNIV68870060548860353030019249667966.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Lintec is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%002380002440OLN6005520020960022264206KANSAINERCARBORUNIV688700605488603530300192GRINDWELL49664205UFPT7966.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Lintec is the large dot.

Lintec competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (7966.T vs AVY vs MMM vs 6988.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Lintec 7966.T$1.87B-14%+3%8%12.2×1.5%
Avery Dennison AVY$14.1B+14%+7%13%17.4×1.9%
3M MMM$95.7B+30%+2%21%19.2×11.3%
Nitto Denko 6988.T$13.2B+10%+7%18%15.1×2.3%

How Lintec compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Lintec against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7966.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-28.5%-14.2%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-14.1%-1.9%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-41.3%-30.2%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.7%+12.1%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin8.1%10.0%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E12.2×24.1×4th cheapest of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)1.5%21.3%6th least demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.2%+10.4%6th lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.8 pp+2.3 pp8th least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.2 pp+1.2 pp10th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA5.7×10.3×2nd cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-1.1×-0.2×6th least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Lintec 7966.TJapan$1.87B-14%+3%8%12.2×1.5%+6.2%
Gansu Energy Chemical 000552.SZChina$1.86B-19%+11%3%33.4×n/an/a
KCC 002380.KSSouth Korea$1.91B-34%0%6%2.1×3.8%+5.0%
Zhejiang Runtu 002440.SZChina$1.77B-1%+23%17%8.5×-5.5%+2.0%
Olin OLNUnited States$1.97B-36%-1%0%n/a44.0%+3.3%
Triumph Science & Technology 600552.SSChina$1.76B-20%+12%5%65.5×21.3%+3.1%
Explosive 002096.SZChina$1.74B-14%-3%9%12.8×-2.5%+37.7%
Anhui Jiangnan Chemical Industry 002226.SZChina$2.07B-3%+13%11%16.8×-3.0%+20.5%
Aica Kogyo 4206.TJapan$1.68B+19%+5%12%12.6×-7.0%+7.6%
Kansai Nerolac Paints KANSAINER.NSIndia$1.67B-7%+10%9%22.1×22.1%+9.7%
Carborundum Universal CARBORUNIV.NSIndia$2.10B+4%+12%7%44.5×43.4%+14.6%
Kunshan Dongwei Technology 688700.SSChina$1.64B-40%+56%13%34.2×23.1%+14.5%
Zhejiang Fulai New Material 605488.SSChina$2.21B+47%+19%2%134.6×31.8%+17.6%
Jiangsu Shemar Electric 603530.SSChina$2.23B-44%+17%29%26.2×23.4%+21.1%
Suzhou Kingswood Education Technology 300192.SZChina$1.55B+24%-6%12%59.3×44.2%-2.3%
Grindwell Norton GRINDWELL.NSIndia$2.25B+16%+14%16%39.5×37.8%+13.4%
C. Uyemura & 4966.TJapan$1.54B-34%+16%23%14.0×5.0%+10.4%
Henan Huanghe Whirlwind 600172.SSChina$2.27B+29%+13%-30%n/an/an/a
Graphite India GRAPHITE.NSIndia$1.50B0%+22%9%21.8×n/an/a
Zeon 4205.TJapan$2.34B+6%+4%11%9.1×-1.5%+6.4%
UFP Technologies UFPTUnited States$2.35B+32%+9%15%28.3×17.8%+27.4%

Questions

Who are Lintec's main competitors?
Named competitors: Avery Dennison (AVY), 3M (MMM), Nitto Denko (6988.T), UPM Raflatac (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Gansu Energy Chemical (000552.SZ), KCC (002380.KS), Zhejiang Runtu (002440.SZ), Olin (OLN), Triumph Science & Technology (600552.SS), Explosive (002096.SZ).
Is Lintec expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.2× against a peer median of 24.1×, 4th cheapest of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Lintec stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -14.1% against -1.9% for the median peer; over one year +13.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.