Loading…

3MMMMCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Industrial Conglomerates

Diversified industrial manufacturer making adhesives, abrasives, safety equipment and Post-it notes, after spinning off its healthcare unit.

Momentum leader 83
Mkt cap
$95.7B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$691M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+15.6 pp
WACC 9.2%
Hurdle
+16 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB+ / A
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
81 days
26 Jan 2027
Close · USD$185.15
1D-1.4%
1W+6.2%
1M+13.2%
3M+1.7%
6M+29.9%
YTD+16.8%
1Y+14.3%
ATR %2.9%
Beta0.76
52w lowhigh6.0% off high

What 3M does

Diversified industrial manufacturer making adhesives, abrasives, safety equipment and Post-it notes, after spinning off its healthcare unit.

Sells thousands of products, largely through distributors to industrial users, with consumer brands going through retailers. Its 2024 spin-off of Solventum, the healthcare unit, left a smaller company focused on industrial, safety and consumer goods. It is also settling legacy claims over earplugs and PFAS chemicals, and said it would stop making PFAS by the end of 2025.

Products and services

  • Safety & industrial (PPE, adhesives)
  • Consumer (Post-it, Scotch tape)
  • Transportation & electronics

Customers

  • Industrial manufacturers
  • Retailers/consumers
  • Automotive & electronics OEMs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial conglomerate
  • Diversified industrial/consumer…
  • Global distribution to industrial…

What could go right

  • Industrial production recovery
  • Portfolio simplification improving margins

What could go wrong

  • Legacy litigation liabilities (PFAS, earplugs)
  • Industrial demand cyclicality

Moat: narrow (brand, IP / patents, scale). Broad patent portfolio and iconic brands (Post-it, Scotch) across many industrial/consumer niches.

Headquarters: Saint Paul, Minnesota, US · Founded: 1902 · Employees: 60,500

Named competitors

3M at a glance

Size 3M (MMM) is a United States Industrials company (Industrial Conglomerates) with a market value of $95.7B, the 134th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $185.15 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 29.9%, against -14.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 17 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.6%); the operating margin is 20.7% (peer median 9.3%).

Valuation It trades at 19.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.2× (4th most expensive of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -5%, so the hurdle is +16 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 15.6 points above its cost of capital (9.2% WACC).

Credit 3M has 15 bonds outstanding ($9.85B), rated BBB+ by the agencies and trading like A at a weighted spread of 67 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 1.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MMM 130Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: 3M against the median of its 16 peers (local-currency closes).

3M financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$25.2B$24.9B$24.6B$24.6B$34.2B
Revenue growth—+2%0%-28%—
Gross profit$9.99B$9.88B$10.1B$9.57B$15.0B
EBITDA$6.65B$6.04B$6.16B$5.48B$5.90B
Net income$3.54B$3.25B$4.17B-$7.00B$5.78B
Free cash flow$2.68B$1.40B$638M$5.07B$3.84B
Capital expenditure$952M$910M$1.18B$1.61B$1.75B
Total debt$15.6B$13.1B$13.7B$16.8B$16.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

3M competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%+150%-50%-25%0%J36047050CIRSA3MINDIABB64174401DCMSHRIRAM2767GSJ43693318327260MMM6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. 3M is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%25×50×75×J36047050CIRSA3MINDIABB6417DCMSHRIRAM2767301335327260MMMRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. 3M is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%J36047050CIRSA3MINDIABB64174401DCMSHRIRAM276743693013356425327260MMMGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. 3M is the large dot.

3M competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MMM vs HON vs AVY vs ITW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
3M MMM$95.7B+30%+2%21%19.2×11.3%
Honeywell Technologies HON$69.8B-1%-17%18%23.2×4.1%
Avery Dennison AVY$14.1B+14%+7%13%17.4×1.9%
Illinois Tool Works ITW$79.8B+11%+5%27%23.4×9.7%

How 3M compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

3M against its 16 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMMMPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+13.2%-4.3%highest of 17
6-month return+29.9%-14.5%4th highest of 17
Distance from 52-week high-6.0%-26.9%2nd highest of 17
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.7%+6.6%6th lowest of 17
Operating margin20.7%9.3%4th highest of 17
Forward P/E19.2×11.2×4th most expensive of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)11.3%3.6%7th most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)-5.0%+14.3%lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+16.3 pp-2.7 ppmost demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+15.6 pp-1.1 pp4th highest of 16
EV / EBITDA16.1×8.0×3rd most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA1.6×-0.6×4th most indebted of 13
Bond spread67 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
3M MMMUnited States$95.7B+30%+2%21%19.2×11.3%-5.0%
Jardine Matheson J36.SISingapore$17.8B-15%-7%8%8.7×0.2%+0.9%
Posco International 047050.KSSouth Korea$6.03B-45%+7%4%8.1×-16.6%+8.6%
Cirsa Enterprises, S.A.U CIRSA.MCSpain$3.69B+54%+6%23%11.8×-7.5%+25.2%
3M India 3MINDIA.NSIndia$3.29B-16%+16%17%39.8×28.0%+14.3%
Societe BIC BB.PAFrance$2.92B+11%-4%15%13.4×-11.9%+5.1%
Sankyo 6417.TJapan$2.68B+16%-23%31%10.2×-18.7%+25.3%
ADEKA 4401.TJapan$2.53B+3%+5%11%11.8×3.6%+5.0%
DCM Shriram DCMSHRIRAM.NSIndia$1.47B-29%+14%7%9.2×16.6%+10.7%
Tsuburaya Fields 2767.TJapan$963M+72%-5%10%10.1×-10.3%+35.0%
Grupo Empresarial San Jose GSJ.MCSpain$517M-14%+11%4%10.6×n/an/a
Tri Chemical Laboratories 4369.TJapan$511M-22%+12%25%12.3×19.4%+19.5%
China Boton 3318.HKHong Kong$435M+163%+11%-5%n/an/an/a
Hangzhou Tianyuan Pet Products 301335.SZChina$415M-15%+4%2%88.6×13.0%+15.7%
Guangzhou Wahlap Technology 301011.SZChina$325M-30%-18%-8%n/an/an/a
Universal Entertainment 6425.TJapan$324M-10%+9%4%9.4×15.1%+6.2%
RF Materials 327260.KSSouth Korea$292M-51%+57%18%29.5×16.7%+28.6%

3M bonds and credit

3M has 15 bonds outstanding with $9.85B face value. The agencies rate it BBB+; its bonds trade like A. Weighted yield 5.57%, a spread of 67 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are 3M's main competitors?
Named competitors: Honeywell (HON), Avery Dennison (AVY), Illinois Tool Works (ITW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Jardine Matheson (J36.SI), Posco International (047050.KS), Cirsa Enterprises, S.A.U (CIRSA.MC), 3M India (3MINDIA.NS), Societe BIC (BB.PA), Sankyo (6417.T).
Is 3M expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.2× against a peer median of 11.2×, 4th most expensive of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -5%, so the hurdle is +16 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has 3M stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +29.9% against -14.5% for the median peer; over one year +14.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.